Stitch Fatigue: A look into the rise and accomplishment of a modern icon

Stitchfan712

New Member
Original Poster
Stitch Fatigue: A look into the rise of Stitch in our lives

This was posted elsewhere and promted a response from me, but i felt it better to make it an entirely new topic...it's long, but i hope it can be read and perhaps considered.


General Grizz said:
I'm OK with this temporarily. But I do NOT want to wake up to an annoying Stitch. It's cute, it makes sense for marketing, but I don't think ANYONE wants to wake up to this.

If this is longterm, ugh...


I would.


It seems to me like some of the people in this forum are suffering from Stitch fatigue...they're beginning to not like him because of his popularity, and therefore anything new with Stitch at WDW is met with "Oh no, I hope this is only temporary!"

Well...



Let me post an observation. Please, hear something from someone who really cares about this:



Disney has not managed to produce an icon for decades. Even the renaissance movies in the early 90s struggled to produce a character with longevity. Genie might be one that has survived, but not on this scale.

The public has a notoriously short memory, and most of us here, being fans of Disney, should know this. Take a look at most of Disney's work throughout the mid to late 90s and you will see a constant stream of "didn't quite make it" movies. There are thousands of reasons why these movies failed to make an impact, but that's another subject for another thread.

The point is, for years, nothing Disney has produced has really impacted the public....nothing has had the heart, the emotion, and the strength, that Lilo and Stitch had. It's funny because, had Lilo and Stitch been produced in the Burbank studios, I have a feeling we wouldn't be here today. Lilo and Stitch, under control of the Burbank managers, might never have received the TLC that helped it become one of Disney's great movies. Simply put, the folks at the florida studio flew closer to pixar's formula of making movies and keeping animators happy, than to Burbank's formula.

And you know what, it worked. The animators, story writers, directors, producers, grew to care a great deal about the characters they were producing in that movie. It wasn't just a job, it was a labor of love. And when the budget cuts came and the promotion funds were slashed again and again, they persevered, and according to Chris Sanders, this gave them even more drive to do the best they could with what little they had. They were determined to make this little film be as best as it could be.

That kind of devotion comes through in every single beautful scene of that movie, from the sheer artistry and beauty of the backgrounds (with watercolor, you got one shot to do it right), to the small, subtle details in the expressions on the characters' faces, to simple and complex shading in areas that might have been overlooked in the past but gave this 2-D film a whole new feel of realism.

It is a work of art, and the story is a work of beauty. It's the deepest thing the company has done in a long time...and it doesn't have jack to do with management at Burbank. It has to do with the hard working dedicated folks at Florida who devoted their lives to making this movie happen.


I respect them, and their contribution to the world with this movie. It gave Disney something they badly needed: A character people would relate to. A character, a movie, that could survive the fickle tastes of the public and carry on. A movie that wouldn't join the long, sad list of failures in Disney's recent past.


Something you guys may not know....but I will tell you.


Remember earlier, I said that I had been there from the beginning, I was no fairweather fan. When I say it, I mean it. I WAS there before there was ANY future of Lilo and Stitch. Before the decision was even made to carry on with the series.


In the beginning, the series was a planned thing, but it was determinate upon the success of the movie itself. Most Disney movies do in fact get that treatment: Exploration of the idea of a TV series based on the movie.

What, in recent years, usually happens is that an underbudgeted, outsourced series does crop up, and with low ratings, becomes relegated to Toon Disney, or, gets cancelled. Hercules, Buzz Lightyear of Star Command, Timon & Pumbaa (which was actually pretty good at the time), and others are examples of this.


With Lilo and Stitch, the initial promotion of the movie, while funny, never really told the story of what the movie was about. Stitch invades other movies...alright...but who is stitch...? The interstitchals, as they were called, were designed to make people curious. It only worked to a degree. But, with a slashed promotion budget, there wasn't a whole lot to be done about that. I did see one longer commercial, just once, that ran on disney channel about the movie, and that one long commercial told a beautiful story about what the movie really was. That commercial showed the heart, and the impact of that commercial was incredible.

But they only ran it once. Had they run it more I expect Lilo and Stitch's initial box would have been much higher.

But as it was, people were expecting another simple summer-thing Disney movie that really wasn't up to par. Initial attendance at theatres was NOTHING like what Pixar was raking in.

Why?

Reputation. Pixar has a GOOD rep with the public. and whether we like it or not, Disney does NOT right now. Disney can only blame itself and its penny-pinching ways for that.


Lilo and Stitch became a popular movie through word of mouth. As people walked into theatres half expecting a bad movie, half expecting a slapstick comedy, all were stunned to see the depth, the power, the emotion, the realism, the humanistic aspect of this movie. A movie that reflected on ourselves and our own journeys in life. the broken family, the social worked, the child that never fit in. Haven't all of us felt like Lilo sometimes?

I was stunned. I think, a large part of every audience, was too. This was something new, this was something different. I watched my life change before my eyes....something...clicked, inside of me with each viewing of that movie and started a change within myself and a soul search that has made me a better person. For a movie to do that to a person is unbelievable, but it happened.

As person spoke to person about this movie and it's difference compared to other recent disney fare, many people who initially chose not to see it, began coming into the fold. The movie's earnings began a slow-burn of popularity. It started, and grew. As the movie eventually dropped out of theatres...we came to find that it was still pulling in very decent to full audiences worldwide. That movie had the longest run of any animated feature at my local movie theatre. People just kept coming, and coming, and coming to see it. The movie left only because the reels had to be returned.

In Japan the movie ran into the next year, its popularity was so great. If I recall correctly, as of March 2003, L&S was STILL in Japanese theatres. Impressive.



This was a movie that was impacting the world like we haven't seen in 10 years. The decision was made to carry on with the series...and...the budget was increased for that endeavour....they gave it the funding it needed to be different from a Toon Disney series...and to become as successful DC series.

And it did. When the series came out, it pulled in ratings for the DC that at times surpassed even Kim Possible, the steady hit for Disney Channel. It also brought in adult audiences, which had been drifting away for a long time as DC transformed itself into a hipper, teeny-bopper network for 11-16 year olds.


Stitch the Movie, the pilot for the series, also broke records in Direct-to-Video sales. Its record has onl been surpassed by the release of The Lion King 1 1/2. That says a lot for Lilo and Stitch...at the time just one year old....to have sales comparable to the likes of The Lion King, Disney's last recognized "smash hit" and former world gross box office record holder, surpassed by Finding Nemo.


Where am I going with this?

Stay tuned.



Even with ALL this success, Disney was very, very reluctant to push the Stitch character in the parks and merchandise-wise. I remember in mid-2003 lamenting at how there were no Stitch T-shirts available for adults.

The pin selection, initially, was very limited as well. And I remember a time when there was only three variations of the Stitch beanbag plushie, and only one 14" plushie of Stitch...which at the time, was miscolored with very dark blue fur. I still have that plush.

The stitch selection was very limited, but it was in line with the normal fare from Disney movies which come, and then go, and are forgotten forever. A merch line that would be easy to close down.


In the disney stores and at the resorts guests began to raise their voices about wanting adult sized Stitch clothing. As these voices raised...a friend of mine in california, an employee of disney and respected in the company, sat down to a lunch with a burbank-area manager about the need for an adult stitch t-shirt in the parks.

A week later, the first test releases of L&S shirts came out. They were simple, normal shirts with a small L&S logo stamped on the chest, not very visible, but there.

They sold out almost immediately.


More "test merchandise" came out in the weeks after. All of which disappeared off the shelves at lightning speed. Finally, finally, Disney released it's first, real, adult t-shirt...a black one of Stitch in the sand. It, too, sold out and stock had to be replenished throughout the DLR. Fortunately I was able to get one.

Merch also increased, disney toyed with the idea of holiday stitches. The christmas of 2002 santa stitch plushies did amazingly well at the disney stores and at DLR...and in 2003 Stitch began to celebrate every holiday.
The public ate it up.

Clearly, Stitch was something different. Even Finding Nemo, when it came out, couldn't move merchandise the way Stitch was.


Why?

You can't hug a fish for one thing! But for another, is that Stitch was a stronger character overall.

In the aftermath of Nemo we have come to find this as being true. Sorry Pixar, but the Nemo movie has become something of a joke these days. In my experience and that of others I've spoken with, people generally laugh these days if you admit to being a nemo fan. That's not a good thing for longevity. Nobody laughs if you like the incredibles. Or toy story. But this sad fate has befallen Nemo. So even with record-breaking box office sales, Nemo, too, has been relegated to a has-been.

Stitch survived because he's in people's hearts.


Disney has come, in the time since, to begin adopting the Stitch character as part of the company's fold. Not happily, mind you. Eisner is still sore that Stitch stole the box office that was intended for Treasure Planet. TP had a story, though, that had been done in other ways many times over the years. It was a done, tired storyline, and the characters were not as easy to relate to. A huge financial loss for the company. And management tended to blame Stitch. Stitch raised the bar for disney quality prior to TP's release...and TP didn't reach the bar. Stitch, restored people's faith in Disney. Including mine.


That faith has since dissipated again, as the public as seen further lacklustre releases from the company after lilo and stitch, and seen the management problems and the horrible way in which the D-animators have been treated. Public opinion of Disney is really low.

But Stitch lives on.


He found his way into the hearts of people around the world because of those hardworking folks at WDFA-F who made it happen, who gave their all, and accomplished the impossible. They beat the odds, survived the torpedoes from Burbank, and made this thing. And made it right.



Stitch's popularity today is a direct result of that effort.


Disney is only now fully embracing his character.


And some seeing this are resisting. I wonder why? I think some of you are used, by now, to the idea of a movie coming, and then going away. When something like this stays, and stays, and stays, it bugs you, don't it? That's called the short attention span of america these recent years taking its toll even on hardcore disney fans. We are too used to characters that stick around just long enough to not bother us or invade our Disney vacation.

Because Stitch has been adopted by the public as a new icon, he isn't going away. He won't be leaving suddenly just as he came, like characters in disney recent past. He's here to stay, because the public wants him here to stay. They adopted him, they let him into their hearts.

For the first time since walt's days...a character is mentioned in the same breath as the Fab 5.



It won't be long before Stitch becomes part of the Fab 6.

Please, please understand, that this is not a bad thing. This is not something that's going to make your life miserable. It's actually quite beautiful, and quite an accomplishment.


Think of all the hard work the florida animators did on this movie.


And 2 years later, their hard effort, their sweat and love....has earned the product of their labor a place right next to the legendary Mickey Mouse, Donald Duck, and Goofy.


Can't you feel that? Can you sit back, take that in, and think....of how proud you'd be, if you had a part in that, if you helped make that movie, and in such a short time the public has embraced it so strongly, that your character can stand with Walt's creations?


Stitch isn't better than the creations of Walt Disney. But he is a modern character which has joined the ranks of Walt Disney's most beloved characters. This is amazing...and were Walt alive today, he would be very proud, very proud indeed, of those florida animators who made it happen.



So no, I do not see this Stitch invasion as a bad thing. If the world can say "Mickey" and know exactly who it is, and can say "Stitch" and a near-equal number of people also recognize him, I say that Stitch has rightfully earned his place alongside the Fab 5.

He's earned his wake up call in the morning.

He's earned his monorail voice.

He's earned the merchandise, the series, the continuing love for him and lilo around the world.


Stitch, is the collective effort of hundreds of people giving their all.


Disney only has a limited hand in how successful a character is when it comes to merchandise. Disney can't put out a flop movie, and then put out tons of merchandise for it, and force the public to buy it. The public buys what it wants to buy. The Stitch invasion is being perpetuated by the general public. If the public stopped liking stitch, the merchandise would stop moving, Stitch woud fade silently into the night like so many recent characters. Disney can't force a character to be loved. The public decides that for itself. So we can't blame disney for the Stitchification of WDW. Disney tested ideas, and the public responded in an overwhelmingly positive way. If anything, Disney has really been conservative in what it's done with the stitch character. It's been reluctant from the start.


He's around because the public wants him around.


The least, the very least, we can do, is respect and admire how far he's come. It says a lot to stand next to Mickey Mouse in just two short years. It says a lot to have a new icon that the world can love because he's REAL, he's flawed like all of us. We can identify with that. That's why Stitch worked, the animators realized this, and created something we could relate to.



They will ALWAYS have my respect. :)




And with that, I step down off my soapbox. Stitch is here to stay, because of the collective effort of people who's contributions have barely been recognized by the management of the company. But the public recognizes it.


So I say, Go Stitch, Go. It's about time we had a new character for US.
 

nfeagle5

Member
Stitchfan712 said:
For the first time since walt's days...a character is mentioned in the same breath as the Fab 5.



It won't be long before Stitch becomes part of the Fab 6.

Please, please understand, that this is not a bad thing. This is not something that's going to make your life miserable. It's actually quite beautiful, and quite an accomplishment.
I dont hold Stich even close to that of the "Fab 5". IMO there are other characters such as Genie or Simba that are far more "deserving" (idk about the word) than Stich. To me there will always be Mickey, Donald and Goofy. Nobody else will infringe on that.
 

dmmgp2000

Member
Wow, very good article you wrote there. That should be published somewhere. Well-written, you make your points but do not force anything down people's throats.

I will say you are absolutely right about the public loving Stitch. I have seen it myself. In January of 2003, I had a 3 year old girl in my group. Her two favorite characters are Buzz Lightyear and Stitch. Several times throughout the day, she would ask her parents and me where she could meet Stitch. (this was before Stitch started showing up in MK I guess, I didn't see him that day). Anyway, she was upset until her dad surprised her with a Stitch plush from the Emporium, which she happily carried around with her the rest of the day. Kids love Stitch, teenagers love Stitch, adults love Stitch. He's not going anywhere, get used to it.

It is kind of surprising to read the amount of Stitch-bashing on these boards lately. Why do some people hate the little guy so much? Sure, the ride may not be up to par, but that's just one aspect of an amazingly successful character. It's not "Stitch's" fault that his ride isn't the quality we're used to from Disney.

You're also right about how the movie touched so many people. When I saw the movie over the summer, I'll admit I wasn't expecting much at all. I came out of the theater shocked at how good that movie was. It reminded me of the early 90s days of Beast, Aladdin, and Lion King. This was the best in a long time. It has quickly become one of my favorite Disney movies as well. Even my "Disney is for kids" college buddies were surprised. When the movie showed at the Florida State Theater in November of 2002, all 4 showings were completely sold out! College students, lining up around the block to see "Lilo and Stitch"!! Amazing.

That's all I got. Again, good article, and Stitch is cool. :cool:
 

BG Rugger

New Member
That was quite possibly the longest thread I have ever read in my entire life :lol:

I totally agree with you. I am a huge Stitch fan and embrace it. He's the only character Disney has had in a while that has stuck with people. When you are in the park shops, if little kids arent looking for Mickey or Minney, theyre looking for Stitch.

I think a lot of Stitich's appeal has to do with how human he is. He struggles to find where he fits in with the world and who he is, which is something I think we all can relate to at some point of time in our life.
 

Stitchfan712

New Member
Original Poster
I even remember when the costumed character of Stitch didn't exist at DLR.

His arrival was something of a miracle as well. At first, he only existed for the promotion of the movie: Lilo's luau show at DCA. That was only supposed to last a couple months. Instead, it was extended, several times, due to its popularity. The Stitch and Lilo costumed characters disappeared for months afterward. But in mid-2003, Disneyland began bringing them back on occasion. More Stitch than lilo. Stitch drew decent lines of people and became at hit. Since then, he's out just about every day, though they moved him back to DCA, at the waterfall.


The interactive Stitch at Innoventions also has gained several leases on life. That, too, was meant to be a short-lived, promotional thing for the movie. It's been extended 4 times. It's still there. (All this at DLR.)
 

dxwwf3

Well-Known Member
That was a very nice novel.......er article ;)

You know that I have never liked the film or the character (Yes I had that opinion before they closed AE), but you did make some good points. I know it may seem that everyone is teaming up against Stitch, but the fact is that the attraction it replaced was very popular among WDW fans. So they expect a new attraction to at least be as good as it's predecessor. And most people do not feel it accomplished that goal.

And another thing is the "Stitch Overkill" that Disney is using to promote the attraction. The TP of the castle, "Stitch Kingdom", Stitch wake up calls, etc.... It's a little much. I don't think any attraction has recieved this much publicity. You can make people tired of something. And I just think alot of people are tired of Stitch right now.

Again, help might be on the way next month. If the SGE rehab isn't just a rumor and the new attraction is worthy in most people's minds, then you won't have to worry about any Stitch bashing.
 

Legacy

Well-Known Member
I like Stitch.

He's a Disney anti-hero and fills a void that has always been present for the Walt Disney Company. However, because he is an anti-hero I don't think he will have the lasting appeal of the real Fab 5 and other classic characters. Yes, Stitch is and will be popular for a quite a while. However his antics will begin to tire people, and his popularity will begin to wane. It's nothing personal against Stitch; it's just the way public opinion works. The only way Stitch could last forever would be with proper pacing. And that isn't happening. There is becoming too much of the lovable misfit, and unfortunately it's gonna turn around and cost him.

That's my honest opinion.
 

Lynx04

New Member
To be honest, It really doesn't matter to me which character they use to make an attraction. As long as it is a well developed attraction. That includes tech, story and theming. PurpleDragon and I were debating in another thread which format will be the dominant format in the future, 2D, or 3D. We both had different opinions, but the one thing we agreed on is that the story is the more important then the format.

Same thing with attraction, you could use Mickey Mouse and have blunder. Figment isn't even a Disney character and he has one of the most loyal fan base. If you had the right story you could make an amazing attraction using penguin # 3 in Marry Poppins. Also, Splash Mountain was an attraction based on a little known film (Songs of the South) of the past few generations.

I think most people are dissapointed in the script, and others feel that Stitch could have had a more worthy attraction made else where. After reading some peoples comments it does make sense that Stitch should have had a more family friendly attraction made else where in the park. The Stitch attraction now is not a bad idea, the problem is that you have attraction that targets kids but employs boogieman tactics (Jumping on the harness or playing with your hair in the dark). Little kids will be scared, Kids are scared on attraction such as "It's Tough to be a Bug" and "HISTA". Say what you want but SGE is scarier then HISTA and ITTBAB. To be honest I think I am becoming more Stitch Thread Fatigued then Stitch Fatigued in general.
 

Stitchfan712

New Member
Original Poster
I think he will last forever if, as you said, he is paced correctly. If disney doesn't overwhelm people.


Right now, I don't think the company has reached that level on a whole.

the way WDW is right now, Stitch is very visible in MGM and a bit less so in MK. He's almost nonexistent in AK, there's just a costumed character there, and he's completely absent from Epcot.

I think Disney could go a bit farther to reach the saturation point, but i don't think they will.

As I said, they've been very conservative with this stitch character so far. Only now are they expanding him.

Still, if you think WDW has too much Stitch, go to DL. There is far less of Stitch to be seen there, just a costumed character in DCA, and an interactive stitch phone in Innoventions. This is a direct result of the former, ultra-conservative mindset of DL's previous presidents, Harris and Pressler who destroyed that park.

With Matt, the magic is returning, and I can guarantee you there will be more Stitch in DL in the future. But it won't be oversaturated.

WDW, right now, is about at the right balance. A Stitch wake up call is a welcome additon, and something our little group of stitch fans online have hoped would happen. A Stitch character breakfast is coming next. I don't see why that would be a bad thing whatsoever. A character as popular as stitch really ought to have a character breakfast.

now he does. And he'll be joining the others in WDW very soon.

My point is that this is something to be proud of. We've wanted Disney to finally have a success after many years of failures, and finally it has one, and the public wants him. Disney is now responding to public demand. It's nice to see a modern character make it that far. I don't see Milo making it to any character breakfasts. So this is an accomplishment for Disney. I don't see why it would be somehow better to go back to the days where no modern character had a chance of standing next to these classic characters. Success is good! And should be encouraged.

The saturation point hasn't been reached, not by a long shot, overall. Within WDW itself, we're about at where we should be with Stitch....i see this only as a good thing.

Stitch has earned his wake-up call.
 

Hakunamatata

Le Meh
Premium Member
I will be honest to say that I am so so on the Stich character, but am becoming more and more accepting of the character. When I first saw the movie, my first reaction was, ok, here is another flop for Disney. I really did not like the story line and thought it was pretty obvious it was a movie created to fit in at the theme park/resort, not something that told a worth while story. I personally think Brother Bear was a much better movie that actually was more in tune with the movies that Walt produced.

That being said, it was a hit and Disney is attempting to capitalize on it. I dont blame them for that. I think the more that the character was in the eye of the public, the more the public came to accept the character. I actually think that the t.v. series was better than the movie and I think that is why the popularity.

This is my opinion and is worth approximatley nothing..... :D
 

Stitchfan712

New Member
Original Poster
Lynx04 said:
Say what you want but SGE is scarier then HISTA and ITTBAB. To be honest I think I am becoming more Stitch Thread Fatigued then Stitch Fatigued in general.


I disagree. Not by a long shot is Stitch scarier than It's tough to be a Bug.

I did that attraction and will never do so again. I'm 20, and it creeped me out.


Stitch is silly, but it isn't scary. I don't know why someone would be frightened except by the dark. When Stitch jumps on your back, he says "Will you be my friend?" I dont find that to be very scary.

But SGE's pros and cons are the subject of several other threads, best discussed there.
 

dxwwf3

Well-Known Member
Stitchfan712 said:
The saturation point hasn't been reached, not by a long shot, overall. Within WDW itself, we're about at where we should be with Stitch....i see this only as a good thing.

Stitch has earned his wake-up call.

That is just your opinion though. Some people might have reached their saturation point a long time ago. And for some people the Monorail and Wake Up Call was the last straw. For example, just because I have reached my saturation point with the Epcot wand, doesn't mean that everyone else has (even though for most people it has :lol: ).

Sure he's a popular character, but he's no Mickey Mouse, Minnie Mouse, Donald Duck, Goofy, or Pluto. You can't really expect Stitch to be everywhere. He was the most popular character of a moderately successful film. It's not like we are talking about Nemo or some other character of a more successful film. I think you should be happy that Stitch is getting his own attraction. I don't think I'll be seeing anything based on the Emperor's New Groove anytime soon :lol:
 

Stitchfan712

New Member
Original Poster
hakunamatata said:
I will be honest to say that I am so so on the Stich character, but am becoming more and more accepting of the character. When I first saw the movie, my first reaction was, ok, here is another flop for Disney. I really did not like the story line and thought it was pretty obvious it was a movie created to fit in at the theme park/resort, not something that told a worth while story. I personally think Brother Bear was a much better movie that actually was more in tune with the movies that Walt produced.

That being said, it was a hit and Disney is attempting to capitalize on it. I dont blame them for that. I think the more that the character was in the eye of the public, the more the public came to accept the character. I actually think that the t.v. series was better than the movie and I think that is why the popularity.

This is my opinion and is worth approximatley nothing..... :D


Valid points, but the timing is slightly off.

The Stitch series didn't premier until late September/Early October 2003. Before that time, there was just the movie, and STM which came out just prior to the series premier.

2003 was really the year of expansion for Stitch. the public was demanding more merchandise, and, very slowly, began to receive it. It really was by popular demand that the stitch franchise began to take off. It wasn't as a result of Disney pushing merchandise on people. Had that been the case, much of what Disney released in stitch merch would have found its way to the surplus warehouses...property control and company D. Instead, very little ever made it that far, because the public bought it all and wanted more.



Stitch's burgeoning popularity is a result of the public embracing him and slowly twisting disney's arm to release more. That, and some well-placed people in the company who were aware of what the public was asking for, and clued upper management in to it.

I've actually heard much the opposite of the theory that the series is what makes stitch popular. I've found, overall, that people find the series too lighthearted and wish that there was more of that depth and emotion in the series that was so present in the movie.

Lilo and Stitch's success, truly, is based on the unique story presented in the original film. The depth, the emotion, the journey. It made these characters so different from anything else, and the public latched onto that.
 

Stitchfan712

New Member
Original Poster
dxwwf3 said:
That is just your opinion though. Some people might have reached their saturation point a long time ago. And for some people the Monorail and Wake Up Call was the last straw. For example, just because I have reached my saturation point with the Epcot wand, doesn't mean that everyone else has (even though for most people it has :lol: ).

Sure he's a popular character, but he's no Mickey Mouse, Minnie Mouse, Donald Duck, Goofy, or Pluto. You can't really expect Stitch to be everywhere. He was the most popular character of a moderately successful film. It's not like we are talking about Nemo or some other character of a more successful film. I think you should be happy that Stitch is getting his own attraction. I don't think I'll be seeing anything based on the Emperor's New Groove anytime soon :lol:


Actually, in terms of longevity, Lilo and Stitch was the more successful film. Nemo had a stellar box office, but L&S is surpassing in terms of post-theatrical-run earnings. That's merch, purchases, and rentals.

As far as Stitch not being a mickey mouse: It's too early to tell really. We'll have to see if Stitch has 50 years of life in him, but it's certainly more possible with his character, than with other recent disney offerings. However, his current popularity is such that he is recognized at least as much worldwide as most of the classic fab 5 characters. With that kind of recognition and popularity, it only makes sense to afford to him the benefits that some of the other characters enjoy: Character breakfasts, wake up calls, etc.

Without these things Stitch really is far behind the classic characters in terms of exposure. He really is. Now with the introduction of these things, the amount of time they last is fully dependent on public response.

If, Stitch comes to character breakfasts, and as a result, attendance drops because people are sick of Stitch, stitch will of course be removed. Likewise, if people complain about the Stitch wake up call, and it proves to not be successful, it will be withdrawn.

but if the public responds positively, they will remain.

As I'm saying, it's entirely dependent on the public. If they want it, disney will test the waters, and if the response is good, disney will go with it. If the response is bad, disney will withdraw. So if we're to be mad at anyone for Stitch's exposure, it should be those who like Stitch.

Hang the stitch fans!

*runs*
 

Lynx04

New Member
Stitchfan712 said:
I don't know why someone would be frightened except by the dark. When Stitch jumps on your back, he says "Will you be my friend?" I dont find that to be very scary.

Haven't you seen Child's Play? Chucky says the same thing.

I am speaking generally, it is kind of like the saying:

"You can take the person out of the ghetto, but you can't take the ghetto out of the person."

I am beginning to the same thing apply to Stitch. It is pratically the same thing as AE except a different story and a cute little alien. The attraction still plays on peoples fears (scaried of the dark, something messing with you in a vulnerable position), it maybe in a joking fashion but it still does. . It doesn't matter if it was Care Bears jumping on your shoulders little kids would still be crying.

That is why people are saying that the idea of doing at Stitch attraction is not bad, but the method that they are doing it, while doesn't scare you, will general scare little children.
 

Stitchfan712

New Member
Original Poster
Point taken. For the record, no, I've never seen Child's Play. I refuse to entertain horror movies.


There's a thread for discussing SGE pros and cons though...
 

Lynx04

New Member
Sorry there are now so many threads on Stitch, they should have his own little forum.

Just to knock this back on topic. I have been a staunch supporter of Disney marketing Stitch, he is one of the more popular characters at the moment. Well he become a lasting character, no one knows. Disney would have to make a few more sequels or release a few books to keep the peoples mind constently on Stitch. If they contiunious do that and the demand is still there, then he may be around for a long time.

Although, I wouldn't expect him to every be part of the 5 main characters. I think because they are a product of Walt, I wouldn't expect them to include any other character.
 

PurpleDragon

Well-Known Member
Stitchfan712 said:
Take a look at most of Disney's work throughout the mid to late 90s and you will see a constant stream of "didn't quite make it" movies. There are thousands of reasons why these movies failed to make an impact, but that's another subject for another thread.
Not too sure how your memory works, but most of the films that came out of the Disney animation studios in the mid to late 90's, did better than Lilo & Stitch ever could.

Overall US Box Office Earnings:

The Lion King (1994) - $328,423,001
Toy Story 2 (1999) - $245,823,397
Toy Story (1995) - $191,773,049
Tarzan (1999) - $171,085,177
A Bugs Life (1998) - $162,792,677

Lilo & Stitch (2002) - $145,771,527

Pocahontas (1995) - $141,600,000
Mulan (1998) - $120,618,403
The Hunchback of Notre Dame (1996) -$100,117,603

Lets not forget that "The Lion King" was made into a Broadway musical AND is the 14th highest grossing film of all time. Also the "Toy Story" character toys sold like hot cakes for a number of years. There were only 3 films during that time that didn't do better than Lilo & Stitch. So I don't know what info your basing your post on, but its not entirely accurate. The only Disney movie that did better than "The Lion King" at the box office, is "Finding Nemo" which is the 12th highest grossing film of all time at $339,714,367.

It has taken 2 years for Disney to pump up and re market the Stitch character, for it to gain any type of popularity. (i.e. cartoon on TDC, plush animals, the ride,etc...)

Didn't read your whole post so I'm not sure if you made any other similar statements. Sorry it was way too long, I have a short attention span :hammer: :snore:
 

Legacy

Well-Known Member
Stitchfan712 said:
Stitch's burgeoning popularity is a result of the public embracing him and slowly twisting disney's arm to release more. That, and some well-placed people in the company who were aware of what the public was asking for, and clued upper management in to it.
I think you have an clouded view of capitalism if you think that the public "forced" Disney into marketing Stitch. The movie was a critical and financial success. That was something that wasn't expected by the Disney higher-ups. The merchandising and cartoon came about because of the film, not because people were complaining that there wasn't enough Stitch. There was no "slow arm twisting" anywhere. Disney started preparing Stitch to be highly marketed probably right after its opening weekend.

Two years after a character is introduced isn't a long time. Emporer's New Groove is FINALLY getting a cartoon after nearly 8 years, and Gargoyles is finally out on DVD after ten years.

Stitch's popularity was never lacking... I don't know where you got that idea. Just because he isn't in the public eye doesn't mean he's not popular.


And I think he's REALLY close to becoming over-hyped.
 

Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.

Back
Top Bottom