I thought this was an interesting article written on Wired, about the flu:
https://www.wired.com/story/flu-vaccine-big-pharma/
I am not anti-vax. The MMR vaccine is 97% effective, yellow fever vaccine 99% effective. Polio vaccine 90 to 100% effective based on how many doses the patient receives. The harshness of these diseases combined with the effectiveness of the vaccines makes the anti-vax stance hard to defend in these instances.
But this season, the efficacy of the flu shot has been touted as low as 10% by the CDC itself. What other product exists that has a 90% failure rate, but still generates 3 Billion in revenue annually, year after year year.
What's interesting is there is likely a way to make a "universal" flu vaccine, one that you would only need 1 to 3 times in a lifetime. (an initial shot + boosters) Instead of targeting the capsid (the balloon shaped part "head" of the virus, which is highly variable due to the genetic material being here), the tail or end plate can be targeted, which is the same in all flu viruses. But from a business perspective, it doesn't make sense due to a 600 mil facility needed, plus another 1 bill and 5 to 10 years needed to develop it. It wouldn't pay for itself since you wouldn't need it every year, and would have high effectiveness. The better a drug or vaccine is, in terms of needed frequency of use and efficacy, the less profitable.
They even still use an antiquated process of "growing" the vaccines: they grow them in chicken eggs.
The perceived laziness by the industry still rewards them 3 bill a year in revenue.
Vilifying one another doesn't help. I will say I am not certain of what the best approach is in considering the flu vaccine for oneself and their family. I think if one opts against it, one should have a plan as to how to combat infection like vitamin D mega-dosing, combined with Zinc, for example.
But it's ok to question, and to ask questions. The CDC for those of us that work in healthcare, unfortunately has a very poor track record. They do ultimately come up with the correct answer, but are usually 2 decades behind the rest of the research community. The recent opiod crisis is a good example. Atleast they finally got there!
For me, self assessment is very important, this makes belief revision possible. Certainty is the enemy of good. I know this by being faced with data that forced me to give up un-related, long held belief systems in recent years.
What I am certain for is my love of Disney, and my love for all of you guys, the fans that love it as much as me. I wish everyone a healthy, flu-free season.