Depends completely on how individuals look at it. However, again, I feel the need to point out that Disneyland started out loaded with outside retail stores. Some that no amount of imagination would be able to figure out why they were in a theme park. (a store that sold Piano's and another that sold Bra's) But, they were and it doesn't matter why they were there, they were there. This is hardly anything new. But, I can understand to some degree the reasoning behind the objection to Starbucks. It just that it doesn't hold up when looked at in reality. And this is from someone that absolutely hates coffee and hate even more how they are able to justify charging what they do for hot water run through ground up beans.
With that in mind, perhaps the fact that Disney and Starbucks prescribe to the same method of profit margin, they are a natural fit.