Wait so which is it? Are lines long because tens of thousands of people want to ride new rides? Or because Disney is deliberately manipulating wait times to drive business to Lightning Lane? Because only one of those applied to FOP when it opened
To be clear, my comment about FOP and the next sentence seperated into another paragraph were two unique statements not meant to be read as a single thought. I'm not saying they deliberately intended to mess with guests for profit directly with what has happened there but if you want to talk about that:
You're right, only one of those was true with FOP because paid LL didn't exist when that came out but what did exist was 60+ day FP booking which is where the majority of that attraction's capacity went prior to the park shutdown last year.
Tens of thousands of people
did want to ride it but for those who were unable to secure the 60+ day fastpass, there were undoubtedly many days they waited 4+ hours to ride because many others who, all-things-being-equal, would not have been willing to wait even an hour to ride it, were able to get their entire group in front.
The pay-to-play factor was a little more buried but it was still there. Why else would so many people who stay on site be so upset about losing their early access to FP+?
This to me, is just cutting more to the chase.
To be crude, now you don't have to take Disney out for a nice dinner and buy them flowes and act interested in their hobbies and tell them you want kids some day. They don't care about the pretenses, anymore. You just have to pay them to get what you want and they're open with no waiting... er... for... business.
This ride will have long waits because it is popular. That's a given.
People who want to ride it won't be able to because it's popular and there is limited capacity.
Them clawing back even more of that capacity to provide to people paying the up-charge (and eventually for people staying on the Starcruiser) simply means that average* guests will have even less of a chance to ride it than before, regardless of how long they're willing to wait.
If you think differently, I'm open to having my mind changed and I really would like to be wrong but if you're going to convince me, it'll take more than optimism or ignoring aspects of the reality in an effort to just win a debate.
I'd honestly rather you be right (that's better for all of us, no?) but being right isn't the same thing as winning an argument - please show me how I've got this wrong.
*and when I say "average", I'm not trying to make this a moral argument. Morals are subjective anyway but it does speak to debate about the value being offered to guests who plan trips and decided how to spend their money. I don't think Disney is going to run out of guests due to these kinds of moves but I also don't have to be happy about them doing these sorts of things, do I?