Demarke
Have I told you lately that I 👍 you?
No - but it is that lack of information that keeps me from being able to fully dismiss either method (because there is not conclusive constraints eliminating either) and making new definitive claims of what the only factors are... like you did.
i can not eliminate or determine what caused the failures (related to the method or not) - so they are data points, not conclusive.
No hou went beyond that... deciding which pieces were impactful and what the scope of relevance was.
a failed test case does not necessarily mean a postulate is wrong - it can also mean it's incomplete in describing the relevant pieces.
TLDR dont take a failure as its wrong - it may be just incomplete
From my personal run throughs at the parks, I can confidently state:
Edit - but to your point, there are any number of factors that can throw a wrench in the system (was the users watch off a few seconds and they clicked to early? did someone leave their phone on battery save mode and it wasn’t cycling on full speed? was the person standing in a space they weren’t getting a good cell signal and didn’t notice it? etc...), but I think finding a repeatable system that minimizes user impact on getting a bad ping is pretty much what we’re doing and I think the methods have been largely pretty good at that, even though every step may not be definitively helpful, we’ve knocked out a lot of things that could be harmful.
Last edited: