doctornick
Well-Known Member
Why couldn't you? Places like Adventureland and Fantasyland combine many places that are geographically disparate – Asian jungles with Caribbean buildings and African treehouses, or French chateaus next to Bavarian villages. Even the "Asia" part of Animal Kingdom mixes Indian tropical rainforests with alpine Nepal.
Yeah. I agree that they do that. And I would argue that they shouldn't. It's better to create a cohesive thematic area than combine different elements/places into a medley.
Also, I think that the Potter areas plus Cars Land changed the game in terms of theme park lands by creating an environment to visit a specific place "right out of a movie" in real life. I would think that is the kind of effect that Disney would want to develop for Star Wars.
As a SW fan and a theme park enthusiast, I'd like to see Disney develop a land where you visit Tatooine (or Jakku or Hoth or whatever) specifically with the environment, architecture, attractions, etc. all fitting into the specific place. That's not quite as possible with saying "this is general desert work in Star Wars where you have Mos Eisley cantina and a starship graveyard".