Star Wars Land announced for Disney's Hollywood Studios

Rteetz

Well-Known Member
I was beat to it...

ptknE0l.jpg
I wish we could have gotten the Bantha attraction...
 

Goofyernmost

Well-Known Member
But you’re ok with other bad movies doing it?

Got it.
I would think that the very thing that makes a movie good or bad is the opinion of individuals. One persons opinion means nothing in either direction, so you have gone on record as a check mark against. I'll wait until the rest of the votes are counted over time. I do believe that they have to find a replacement for Solo since they killed off the character a couple years ago. All they can really use it for are flashbacks and it appears to me that they are desperately trying to make the franchise one that jumps back and forth between a long, long time ago, to one that is even further in the past. No real chronological order to them.
 

Slowjack

Well-Known Member
Was there originally a third attraction for this land that featured Banthas?
In earlier plans, there was an upper-level path (think of the Peoplemover over Tomorrowland) traversed by Banthas you could ride. A gentle C-ticket kind of ride that would have really added some atmosphere to the land. From what people have said, Team Disney Orlando balked at the cost, and since development costs would have been shared, this effectively killed it for Disneyland as well.
 

shortstop

Well-Known Member
In earlier plans, there was an upper-level path (think of the Peoplemover over Tomorrowland) traversed by Banthas you could ride. A gentle C-ticket kind of ride that would have really added some atmosphere to the land. From what people have said, Team Disney Orlando balked at the cost, and since development costs would have been shared, this effectively killed it for Disneyland as well.
As much as I wish this had made the cut, I can’t for the life of me picture how this would’ve worked. How fast does a Bantha move? It almost seems impossibly slow.
 

MisterPenguin

President of Animal Kingdom
Premium Member
As much as I wish this had made the cut, I can’t for the life of me picture how this would’ve worked. How fast does a Bantha move? It almost seems impossibly slow.

GMTA. That's what I keep saying. You want something going at the speed of an elephant to, what, pull a cart of 8 people? What's that THRC like, 160 people per hour? Outside where they have to shut it down for rain?
 

MisterPenguin

President of Animal Kingdom
Premium Member
Back on topic...

Anybody know what's going on with Surabat River Valley? The trading card map shows a speeder going into a canyon of spires with the caption "Navigate with caution, Treacherous turns!" Everything else on the map fits in to attractions or areas that have been known about for a while, but I'm not sure where this one fits in.

I'm assuming that image is in reference to the Millennium Falcon ride. We'll probably have to navigate Surabat either taking off or landing in the MF ship.



Yes, I phrased that purposely that way. :p
 

tribbleorlfl

Well-Known Member
Interesting that they went with the FO ATAT instead of the FO AT M6 "Gorilla Walker" for Alcatraz. The M6 is a much more memorable amd threatening design where as the FO ATAT has only minimal differences from the Imperial model. I guess the size and scale just wouldn't have worked in the ride.
 

drod1985

Well-Known Member
Interesting that they went with the FO ATAT instead of the FO AT M6 "Gorilla Walker" for Alcatraz. The M6 is a much more memorable amd threatening design where as the FO ATAT has only minimal differences from the Imperial model. I guess the size and scale just wouldn't have worked in the ride.

Yeah, I think size/scale is a big part of it (pun intended) but the standard AT-AT also evokes then original’s look more, which will connect better with those who prefer the OT.
 

Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.

Back
Top Bottom