News Star Wars: Galaxy's Edge - Historical Construction/Impressions

Curious Constance

Well-Known Member
Star Wars is not a movie, it's a lifestyle choice.

565e1d69d68036147964f4722da1b43f--star-wars-music-star-wars-.jpg
That's exactly the problem.
 

Disney Irish

Premium Member
I went to an x-men wedding reception where the groom dressed up like Cyclops and the bride was Jean Gray. It was a lot of fun.

My sisters wedding was all cosplay where everyone dressed up in different costumes. My sister and her husband dressed up like characters from World of Warcraft complete with swords and all. The minister was dress up like Vader. Its not my thing, but it was fun.
 

Phroobar

Well-Known Member
My sisters wedding was all cosplay where everyone dressed up in different costumes. My sister and her husband dressed up like characters from World of Warcraft complete with swords and all. The minister was dress up like Vader. Its not my thing, but it was fun.
That's fun and creative. It's something they will remember forever. It's better than a pretend Disney Princess wedding that cost more than a house.
 

BrianLo

Well-Known Member
Original Poster
To be ironically fair, there is seemingly no correlation with the blessing of size and Disney's decisions to expand or eat away at their park.

WDW has plenty of room, but sometimes it seems like no one has told them that. We can joke plenty about size, but it's funny SW:GE didn't actually expand park borders in Florida, but did in landlocked Disneyland.

Also the thing no one is talking about: the hotel experience offers approximately the same annual capacity as the two rides do in three days. It's literally a 1%er addition. So add an * when we count that towards anything.
 

MisterPenguin

President of Animal Kingdom
Premium Member
To be ironically fair, there is seemingly no correlation with the blessing of size and Disney's decisions to expand or eat away at their park.

WDW has plenty of room, but sometimes it seems like no one has told them that. We can joke plenty about size, but it's funny SW:GE didn't actually expand park borders in Florida, but did in landlocked Disneyland.

Also the thing no one is talking about: the hotel experience offers approximately the same annual capacity as the two rides do in three days. It's literally a 1%er addition. So add an * when we count that towards anything.

From a business's point of view, it is a Bad Idea to just keep expanding while leaving some park areas underutilized. The underutilized areas/attractions aren't bringing in guests, but yet, they're costing the company for operation and maintenance.

GMR needed a huge capital expenditure to update it. So, they decided to spend the money on something new that (I guess) they thought would be more popular and "more Disney." SWL is replacing a moribund Back Lot ride and outdoors studio set and expensive car stunt show. Pandora replaced a place-holding 'temporary' camp Mickey. Ellen's Energy became a joke as a nap ride and it, too, needed big bugs to update the worn down set pieces. Keeping that while building new somewhere else is just bad business.

That being said, the blessing of size did make an appearance: The DHS project expanded into the swamps with the extra parking and the SW Resort. And its footprint was increased recently with Sunset Showcase and with TSL taking over actual back. Ratatouille and GotG and the UK ride are expanding Epcot's footprint. TRON is expanding MK's.
 

Stevek

Well-Known Member
To be ironically fair, there is seemingly no correlation with the blessing of size and Disney's decisions to expand or eat away at their park.

WDW has plenty of room, but sometimes it seems like no one has told them that. We can joke plenty about size, but it's funny SW:GE didn't actually expand park borders in Florida, but did in landlocked Disneyland.

Also the thing no one is talking about: the hotel experience offers approximately the same annual capacity as the two rides do in three days. It's literally a 1%er addition. So add an * when we count that towards anything.
I was very surprised that they decided to "fit" SWGE in the space they did at DHS versus expanding the borders a bit more.
 

shortstop

Well-Known Member
GMR needed a huge capital expenditure to update it. So, they decided to spend the money on something new that (I guess) they thought would be more popular and "more Disney." SWL is replacing a moribund Back Lot ride and outdoors studio set and expensive car stunt show. Pandora replaced a place-holding 'temporary' camp Mickey. Ellen's Energy became a joke as a nap ride and it, too, needed big bugs to update the worn down set pieces. Keeping that while building new somewhere else is just bad business.
I refuse to accept any justification for killing GMR when there is so much room to expand, and areas like animation courtyard still exist... you know as well as I do the parks need capacity. Killing one attraction to build another doesn’t get the job done.
 

Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.

Back
Top Bottom