Disney Irish
Premium Member
You put it as if Frontierland was used to promote Davy Crockett. Davy Crockett promoted Frontierland. I don't care about synergy or promotions, I just want good quality attractions, lands, and theme parks. If a TV show or movie lazily promotes a theme park, people can see right through that. But if a theme park lazily promotes a TV show or movie, no one calls them out because people are stupid when it comes to theme parks as an art. How is it that people can look at movies and video games and the like as art, but not theme parks?
If the answer to the question of whether theme parks are art is yes, and I think it is. Then you have to be willing to accept that there are many different interpretations of what is considered good art within that medium. As you can't just say I will only accept Van Gogh or Pablo Picasso as art and nothing else. There also has to be room for Campbell's Soup Can by Andy Warhol, all the stuff Banksy does, and other subversive art. You may not like those pieces of art, but they are still art nonetheless and considered good by someone. The same goes for attractions, movies, TV shows, or whatever, they are still art whether you like them or not.
However with that said, I will just add that theme parks are not a static art form. Meaning that it doesn't stay the same throughout history, just like TV shows and movies. As such one has to concede that change within that art form is inevitable whether you like that change or not.
Last edited: