I've watched 2:30 of the video so far. I'm not doubting anything the says, but we had a vastly different experience than she did. And no amount of gaslighting from a bunch of people on this board who never went can change that.
And to me that illustrates how poorly set up the whole thing actually was.
I mean, Disney can't control the weather but during your excursion, if it was a sunny day, you probably wouldn't realize how crappy scanning those crates that they had total control of the placement and environment for was for someone paying for the same experience on a rainy day.
You might have been a little less bitter about the lack of payoff than someone wondering why they couldn't have placed them under some sort of cover.
Assuming the system they used to track things didn't break for you, you could have been having an amazing experience next to someone else where nothing was going right and you wouldn't even know it. You'd come off thinking you had nearly the exact experience they did and feeling like anyone who didn't think it was amazing was trolling or just crazy.
How many people did it break for?
We'll never know but even a 1% failure would be a disaster because it would mean that potentially someone on
every "voyage" was paying crazy money for a broken experience.
If people didn't realize it wasn't working the way it should for them, Disney might not even know the number because if they (Disney) were aware something was wrong, one would have assumed someone would have manually stepped in to correct it behind the scenes in real-time without having to handle a guest complaint to prompt them.
I mean sure, maybe she was just a super-unlucky person who just happened to be one of the rare exceptions and it just so happened she was also a detail-oriented vlogger making it unlucky for Disney and this was a one in a million type of thing but she points out how people who shared that sentiment from their own experiences on Reddit were shouted down by others who didn't have problems so who really knows?
Pure speculation on my part but if Disney was consistently having trouble keeping things working behind the scenes 100% of the time for
all guests in this kind of way, that may have been a major contributor to the abrupt shutdown and no apparent effort to rework it. No story element changes are going to fix that and it's difficult to charge what they're charging for an experience that guest could spend half or more of their trip on before realizing something isn't working like it should be.
If a guest needs to go to a counter to complain that their immersive experience isn't working, it's kind of too late, anyway, isn't it?
How do you recover their experience from that?
I could see something like that combined with declining bookings making them think the whole thing was basically a failed experiment and not worth the effort to try fixing if it was going to require major retooling of how the core system controlling it all worked, especially if they had the opportunity to take a write-down on it and get out before having to carry operations into their next financial year while trying to fix things.
I mean, would you want to roll the dice and pay the money to go if you knew there was a decent likelihood your experience could have ended up like hers? Especially with a company that would try to stonewall you on a $30 refund for a photo package they didn't actually provide?
What kind of "fix" would you expect from said company for a failed $6k experience?
I think what's actually most damaging for Disney about a postmortem like this is the last fifteen minutes
(well, and the Spirt Airlines foreshadowing) where she takes this experience and connects it to wider critiques about current operations at their US resorts, in general. It speaks to problems bigger than one expensive and accidentally bad "voyage".