And April is filled. The site won't show March nor April anymore.
Average $5,500 per room per 'cruise.'
100 rooms per cruise.
Sixty-nine full 'cruises' so far.
$19 Million in revenue.
And that's not counting all the partially booked days so far...
A fully booked year would be: $100 million. Not counting the merch.
And April showers... that's how you get Pilgrims.April is the cruelest month.
"But nobody is interested in it", "It's going to be a complete failure", "Who'll book a hotel without a swimming pool" etc, etc
Granted, I haven’t posted in a while and didn’t read this whole thread but your note about the swimming pool made me laugh… When booking today, that wasn’t even a thought in my head. I do not care about the presence of a pool during a two night hotel stay."But nobody is interested in it", "It's going to be a complete failure", "Who'll book a hotel without a swimming pool" etc, etc
And I'm not even bothered about going myself so don't even have a dog in the fight (I'm not into animal cruelty by the way, in fact I'd happily castrate anyone caught dog-fighting and it's just a saying). I do struggle understanding the hatred and desire for this to seemingly fail by many on here though? For me personally this does nothing to affect me if I choose not to go. It's not really using valuable real estate, doesn't take anything away from me and if successful could even encourage more money being invested into the parks.
Well today alone somebody says they and their friend are Star Wars fans and don't 'feel this' and equate that to mean Star Wars fans probably aren't interested because they're not. They're perfectly entitled to hold that view but it seems bizarre to use your own personal 'judgement' (of something you've absolutely no experience of as it isn't even open yet) to measure the success of something. As I mentioned earlier, this very thread contains numerous examples of those interested in going (including your dad) and yet this is discounted in measuring the success of this 'hotel' by the same people. Note I'm not using initial interest to guarantee success, just pointing out that we don't know either way yet so should hold fire. However the poster gleefully predicting that it will never be fully booked beyond it's first month has already been proven wrong after making a long post about why their prediction meant it would fail.Granted, I haven’t posted in a while and didn’t read this whole thread but your note about the swimming pool made me laugh… When booking today, that wasn’t even a thought in my head. I do not care about the presence of a pool during a two night hotel stay.
And as for people not being interested… my father was last at Disney in 2001. When I mentioned this, it was the first time he’d shown interest in coming on our every 18-24 month trips since… 2001.
Now, I doubt I’ll do this again, or at least for many years, but I’m excited to try it at least once.
Maybe I'm wrong, but I do believe the majority of the hatred is not for the endeavor itself, but the value: aka, the price + what you get for it. People feel the price is too much for what they're offering.I do struggle understanding the hatred and desire for this to seemingly fail by many on here though? For me personally this does nothing to affect me if I choose not to go. It's not really using valuable real estate, doesn't take anything away from me and if successful could even encourage more money being invested into the parks.
By then I'll have my model of the ship and my onboard photo and my picture of a towel folded like a droid or whatever so I won't care if it turns to dust!Which is almost certainly the reason they've priced it this way. Even if they have trouble filling the rooms in 2-3 years (which I'm expecting, but who knows) they'll probably have already come close to recouping what they spent to build it. And then they can lower the price to keep it fully booked and still make money.
Gee, you would think they knew this was coming and built some "synergy" into the system to be ready for it?My understanding is that the long wait times to book are because there are four non-connected computer systems that need to be updated for each Starcruiser reservation. Because they're not connected, you have to re-enter everyone's information in each, possibly along with some other information from the previous systems.
When I booked, the phone lines opened at 7 a.m. I was connected to an agent at 10 a.m. who said I was their second call of the day.
For some you're probably right. Just throughout the thread it's full of posts of doom. There's a reason for some of it, however there's also a general attitude by a minority to just trash anything without knowing much about it.Maybe I'm wrong, but I do believe the majority of the hatred is not for the endeavor itself, but the value: aka, the price + what you get for it. People feel the price is too much for what they're offering.
And why this results in wishes that it fails? Because if it succeeds, it'll show Disney yet again that they can scam the living daylights out of their guests, putting prices way up high while not offering something on par with it, and people will still excitedly pay for it.
People want it to fail so that disney will either a) pull the price down to something reasonable or b) start offering something better for that price.
I doubt anyone hates the idea of disney being innovative, even if said innovation isn't their cup of tea. The issue, as always, seems to be the daylight robbery.
Yes, it does come across as badly organised if true.Gee, you would think they knew this was coming and built some "synergy" into the system to be ready for it?
Guess no one told reservations to do some planning.
We have already established the the towels will be folded like Jar Jar Binks! (and there is no pool)By then I'll have my model of the ship and my onboard photo and my picture of a towel folded like a droid or whatever so I won't care if it turns to dust!
(and I suppose my kids will have some nice memories, blaa blaa blaa)
But can we really know if the price is too much for what they are offering? No one has experienced it. It’s effectively a deluxe tier all inclusive for two days with planned and unplanned fun activities.Maybe I'm wrong, but I do believe the majority of the hatred is not for the endeavor itself, but the value: aka, the price + what you get for it. People feel the price is too much for what they're offering.
And why this results in wishes that it fails? Because if it succeeds, it'll show Disney yet again that they can scam the living daylights out of their guests, putting prices way up high while not offering something on par with it, and people will still excitedly pay for it.
People want it to fail so that disney will either a) pull the price down to something reasonable or b) start offering something better for that price.
I doubt anyone hates the idea of disney being innovative, even if said innovation isn't their cup of tea. The issue, as always, seems to be the daylight robbery.
Soonest the site shows now is July.
That was a bug of the site if you asked it to show a filled month, like March or April. Which now seems to be fixed.Soonest the site shows now is July.
Aren't the list of activities out? I recall seeing one and it included "card games" and other underwhelming options.But can we really know if the price is too much for what they are offering? No one has experienced it. It’s effectively a deluxe tier all inclusive for two days with planned and unplanned fun activities.
That’s your opinion on the activities, and you are certainly allowed to think that. But you also prove my point.Aren't the list of activities out? I recall seeing one and it included "card games" and other underwhelming options.
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.