Why does the porte-cochère look like a giant coffin?
Well, it's not called "Star *Picnics*"!!
Why does the porte-cochère look like a giant coffin?
Proof that I can give you that you will believe? No. I can say though that I have been in that building at least once a week for the last four out of six weeks. You don't have to believe me, and I honestly don't care if you do. But work has been going on inside, even if it's just design work. There has been nothing I have seen to tell me work was not going on in the weeks I was not in there.
Once again, I am NOT a Disney employee. Just work for an outside vendor, as a consultant. So take that as you will. But I have not seen work slowing down other than external construction.
Are you stating that Disney violated emergency orders with continuous "design work"
Construction was never forbidden in Florida or Orange.
UO's Jurassik coaster has continuously been worked on. Some Reedy Creek infrastructure projects never stopped.
"Design work" doesn't seem to refer to construction. Let's wait for clarification.
He hasn’t been on here since you asked for clarification last night, so this post seems more than a little petty.Still waiting for that clarification.
Well I’m still glad they did all that. DHS and DL are better because of Stardust, better parking, etc.And the Skyliner. And the rearranged parking lots. And the new entry access and interchange. And a new parking garage. And Project Stardust....
The changes within Disneyland are.... questionable. What did you think of them?Well I’m still glad they did all that. DHS and DL are better because of Stardust, better parking, etc.
Well the park pre pandemic was bursting at the seams. It needed better crowd flow. I’m used to the generally large walkways at WDW. It was almost comical some of the crowd flow problems the park had especially around Fantasmic. While I miss some of the gardens especially in NOS, I think that the park desperately needed the extra efficiency. You might be able to say that the impact was negligible and just a clever marketing scheme devised by some mid level executive and cost the park more in charm than it provided in efficiency, but I think any improvement possible was necessary. Just my $.02.The changes within Disneyland are.... questionable. What did you think of them?
That’s odd. It was generally unusually quiet when we visited (and we were obviously glad)Well the park pre pandemic was bursting at the seams. It needed better crowd flow. I’m used to the generally large walkways at WDW. It was almost comical some of the crowd flow problems the park had especially around Fantasmic. While I miss some of the gardens especially in NOS, I think that the park desperately needed the extra efficiency. You might be able to say that the impact was negligible and just a clever marketing scheme devised by some mid level executive and cost the park more in charm than it provided in efficiency, but I think any improvement possible was necessary. Just my $.02.
The changes within Disneyland are.... questionable. What did you think of them?
They weren’t stardust. Think where planters and seating were removed, where paths were widened, to cope with the crowds that never came.Some are better than others. I love the changes in Adventureland. The new tiki hideaway ads a lot to the land and is really well done. The new Matterhorn waiting area seems like a big plus as well.
I’m trying to think of any changes I was totally against.
It didn’t help that I visit DL during D23 or during Christmas lol.That’s odd. It was generally unusually quiet when we visited (and we were obviously glad)
In all honest DHS has needed a slip exit since May 1989.
They weren’t stardust. Think where planters and seating were removed, where paths were widened, to cope with the crowds that never came.
It’s akin to the MK hub in 2002 compared to now. Albeit the MK has the crowds.
Depends which listAlso... the ones I mentioned as well as the castle refresh were listed as part of project stardust.
Haven't been following this one. Is it still happening? Seems a waste of money, IMO. Much more pressing things to consider, especially now. Does WDW need more Star Wars? Will the hotel even be sustainable and profitable in the short term? Popular long term? I just don't see the need for it. Still rather that money spent elsewhere like on increasing the attraction count. (So long as it's not more SW. DHS is covered)
It sounds like you aren't really the target audience for this but I can assure you that there are a lot of people looking forward to this.
I’m going by the published by Disney Parks Blog list.Depends which list
Exactly.I’m going by the published by Disney Parks Blog list.
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.