Movielover
Well-Known Member
Or maybe sabaac?
Didn't know I wanted this until now! That would be great! Totally would be acting suave like Lando, this place better allow capes!
Or maybe sabaac?
No Windows !
I've been thinking...
The only way I could convince myself of a space role play full immersion thing would have been when my sons were little.
Because I would have been doing it with and for them.
I would have worn a costume for them, play acted for them.
When kids are little, their ability to believe what they pretend is quite real and can be very enjoyable for a parent.
Now, that my sons will likely be 18 years of age when this hotel opens - I can't really see us role playing.
Not that I wouldn't like to check out this hotel and stay there if we could afford to.
I know my sons would still want to stay.
No way they put an age restriction on this.
The "Build Your Own Saber" experience is getting even more serious now.Looks like a bunch of kyber crystals
http://starwars.wikia.com/wiki/Kyber_crystal
View attachment 297852
What is the Edison you're referring to? Search couldn't find a reference to it in this thread.This idea of age restrictions has already backfired on the Edison. Need to rethink the audience in WDW. Sure you'd like a purely adult crowd but how many empty tables can it sustain? So much competition.
Can't imagine Disney banning children of any age in a resort.
\
The "Build Your Own Saber" experience is getting even more serious now.
This idea of age restrictions has already backfired on the Edison. Need to rethink the audience in WDW. Sure you'd like a purely adult crowd but how many empty tables can it sustain? So much competition.
Can't imagine Disney banning children of any age in a resort.
\
I obviously didn’t word that well. As far as I know they have not lifted the age restriction.Did the Edison remove he age restriction at night? I had not heard that.
Bioreconstruct thinks the cyan covering is seeding. But, according to the filed blueprints about 90% of the cyanized area will be covered by building and parking.
So, anyone know what that is?
In these discussions people tend to go to extremes. A discussion around age restrictions and how they might handle toddlers (kids 3 and under) turned into “Disney banning all kids”. This resort will obvioulsy appeal to a lot of kids and there’s no chance Disney would make it adult only. That shouldn’t even be a discussion. Since we don’t know all of the details I think it’s to fair to speculate on how things might work. The cell phone ban was one poster suggesting they ban phones because it would ruin immersion. That’s not going to happen either. Another extreme.What is the Edison you're referring to? Search couldn't find a reference to it in this thread.
BTW, I don't think anyone in this thread has suggested that this resort will be age restricted, though it has been put forward that age restricting certain experiences might be appropriate. Personally, I don't see age _restrictions_ at all, but just that there may be some age recommendations for enjoyment.
People have questioned what activities would be available for toddlers and thus, whether questioned how toddlers would be accommodated.
I think all the "discussion" of "no kids" was actually started by people who made up the idea that kids would be banned and then became indignant at the idea. This phenomenon is strange to me. Is there a name for it? And were there actually people lured into taking the position that kids would be banned? I could see how this happens if someone taking the "no way kids would be banned" position said enough inflammatory and outrageous things. I mean look how I've been lured into a discussion under the ridiculous premise that Disney would ban kinds. It's like the previous "discussion" we had in this thread about how it was ridiculous to suggest that Disney would confiscate cellphones or the previous "discussion" we had in this thread about how Disney would keep guests captive and not let them leave for 3 days.
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.