So, TRoS is a bag of contradictions.
Critics: Critics loved Episodes 7 & 8. However, they give TRoS the same low scores as The Phantom Menace. For critics, those two movies are tied for last place.
Audience: TRoS got a poor CinemaScore at B-. But, that's the only poor audience metric. PostTrak has generally good scores from audiences. And the self-reporting ratings at Rotten Tomatoes and IMDB have fairly good scores for TRoS. The audience rating puts TRoS higher than TLJ, Solo, and all the prequels.
Box Office: TRoS needs $825 million worldwide to break even. After that... it's a success financially since it will have turned a profit. Though some may want to talk about failing to succeed spectacularly with a moving goalpost... let's deal with real numbers [as much as we can discern]... a profit is a profit. And $825 million BO is that break even point based on the usual Hollywood practices (a metric which Deadline also uses).
Disney v. Lucas: The real funny thing is that if you average all the critics scores and all the audience scores of the SW films produced by Lucas v. the ones produced by Disney... they're essentially identical. Disney did just as well with SW as Lucas did by that metric.... whether one sees that as a good thing or a bad thing is personal taste. Although... Lucas's films had a much higher Rate of Investment return with the Box Office v. Budget totals. And that's because Disney loves to bust budgets, eating into their theatrical profits.
View attachment 435735
So, TRoS is a bag of contradictions.
Critics: Critics loved Episodes 7 & 8. However, they give TRoS the same low scores as The Phantom Menace. For critics, those two movies are tied for last place.
"
Solo: A Star Wars Story grossed $213.8 million in the United States and Canada, and $179.1 million in other territories, for a total worldwide gross of $392.9 million.[11] With an estimated production budget of $275 million,[10] the film needed to gross at least $500 million worldwide to break even.[113][114]
A week after its worldwide debut of just $147.5 million, Variety wrote that the film would lose Disney "tens of millions of dollars" off a projected final total gross of $400–450 million[115] while The Hollywood Reporter estimated the losses would range from $50 to $80 million.[116] In April 2019, Deadline Hollywood calculated the film lost the studio $76.9 million, when factoring together all expenses and revenues.[117] "
Solo lost money for them.
After that they stopped greenlighting tons of Star Wars films.
If this flops then they might shelf Star Wars for a while and concentrate on profitable movie divisions like the Animation/Live Action and Marvel.
The fact that this movie is rated lower/same by critics than Episode 1 and 2 is absolutely astounding. I just watched those movies and even though they are a very guilt pleasure of mine to watch... I couldn't imagine someone thinking that they are overall better movies than Ep. 9.
There are many problems with 9, but not enough to put it on par with those two.
I'm purely talking about a review standpoint. Whether or not you saw the movie from the last two is a whole different ball game. I personally have a lot of friends who were into Star Wars just enough to see TFA and TLJ, but they disliked them both as movies so opted out of seeing Ep. 9. That is not saying anything on my thoughts of the last two movies, but it is something I've seen.On one hand...I fully agree with you...no way the story I’ve read puts it near those two...
On the other hand...I haven’t seen it. Which is insane and is just an indictment of all the baggage that Star Wars carries. In a way - it’s 1 & 2 that are responsible. Disney was never going to be allowed to make mediocre or worse Star Wars movies...the backlash was guaranteed.
Talk about a “phantom menace”?
I get what you’re saying...and i did what your “casual” friends did and I’m a diehard.I'm purely talking about a review standpoint. Whether or not you saw the movie from the last two is a whole different ball game. I personally have a lot of friends who were into Star Wars just enough to see TFA and TLJ, but they disliked them both as movies so opted out of seeing Ep. 9. That is not saying anything on my thoughts of the last two movies, but it is something I've seen.
I have no issues with the casting...I think they had no stories...stillAlot of that comes down to casting. Not liking the character or actors in this trilogy.
One of my personal problems with the films was an overhyping of characters/actors only to be severely underused. Phasma? Onscreen for maybe 10 minutes and killed twice. Holdo? Onscreen for maybe 15 minutes. Knights of Ren? Hyped for first movie but didn't appear until the last film and were nothing other than overhyped bodyguards. Benicio del Toro being made into an interesting character only to be not used in the final movie. Rose being given a very large role in Episode 8 only to be cut to nothing in 9... etc.I have no issues with the casting...I think they had no stories...still
There’s no meat on any of their bones. Can’t reuse OT plot weenies and provide nothing else...and in abrams case, try to be “mysterious”
I'm definitely surprised they went with that, especially since they clearly want Rey to be a role model to young girls. What kind of example does that set?The real problem with The Rise of Skywalker is that there are certain things set up in the movie, such as Finn wanting to tell Rey something and the romantic build up between Poe and Rey, that don't have any pay off or are just pushed aside for something else. There's so much tension in the line of "You know what you are? You're difficult," that Rey says to Poe, it's a perfect set up for the classic "can't get along but later fall in love" trope from every 1950's musical. Based on their interaction in The Last Jedi, the "you're difficult" line, and Poe getting offended when Finn wants to tell Rey something but won't say it in front of him (reminiscent of Han getting upset with Leia on Endor), Rey and Poe are a natural relationship in the Sequel Trilogy. Instead, it's an abusive man who tried to murder her that they pair her with? It's disgusting. Maybe there's still potential for Rey and Poe seeing as she has his droid for some reason.
My take on this whole thing is that the critics loved TLJ because they are woke.
This is a foolish take.
Oh, no. It absolutely is. It was a bad take when it was used against The Force Awakens, and it was a bad take when used against The Last Jedi.When you are the head of a studio that begins production on a trilogy based on one of the biggest franchises in history. And you go and make up shirts to parade around in proclaiming "The Force is Female" - Not so foolish of a take.
Whining about wokeness is more cringeworthy than people who champion being woke.And yet you are following the fool.
So, TRoS is a bag of contradictions.
Critics: Critics loved Episodes 7 & 8. However, they give TRoS the same low scores as The Phantom Menace. For critics, those two movies are tied for last place.
Audience: TRoS got a poor CinemaScore at B-. But, that's the only poor audience metric. PostTrak has generally good scores from audiences. And the self-reporting ratings at Rotten Tomatoes and IMDB have fairly good scores for TRoS. The audience rating puts TRoS higher than TLJ, Solo, and all the prequels.
Box Office: TRoS needs $825 million worldwide to break even. After that... it's a success financially since it will have turned a profit. Though some may want to talk about failing to succeed spectacularly with a moving goalpost... let's deal with real numbers [as much as we can discern]... a profit is a profit. And $825 million BO is that break even point based on the usual Hollywood practices (a metric which Deadline also uses).
Disney v. Lucas: The real funny thing is that if you average all the critics scores and all the audience scores of the SW films produced by Lucas v. the ones produced by Disney... they're essentially identical. Disney did just as well with SW as Lucas did by that metric.... whether one sees that as a good thing or a bad thing is personal taste. Although... Lucas's films had a much higher Rate of Investment return with the Box Office v. Budget totals. And that's because Disney loves to bust budgets, eating into their theatrical profits.
View attachment 435735
Oh, no. It absolutely is. It was a bad take when it was used against The Force Awakens, and it was a bad take when used against The Last Jedi.
Seeing The Emperor again was amazing! I really liked how The Emperor was the puppet master behind Snoke and the First Order. I also liked how Rey was his granddaughter.Saw the movie on Saturday. I loved it! Its definitely in my top 5 for Star Wars Movies! It was the best star wars movie since return of the jedi in my opinion. I really don't get why people are hating this one. I cant wait to go see this again!
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.