Staggs says changes to Fantasyland...

Grizzly Hall 71

New Member
The only thrill ride that will fit is so clear. After all my wishing it's finally coming true.















THE MATTEHORN IS COMING!!!!!










Sike lol. But the only thrill ride I think could be based off Night On Bald Mountain.
 

peter11435

Well-Known Member
Aladdin might work. The carpets in Adventureland are supposedly nothing to worry about, as rumors say that the spinner will be converted to Dumbo 2, and the carpets themselves are getting shipped off to Tokyo DisneySea.

The Magic Carpets of Aladdin are not going anywhere.
 

Computer Magic

Well-Known Member
I think most of us posted (at least I did) what is finally being realized by Disney.

1) it was too girl sided. Only good for if you have a family of all girls...hmm I might know someone that fits that...

2) HP would play a role in Disney having to make adjustments. HP is non gender bias. Disney needs to taylor to everyone as HP just stole 2% of attendant.
 

aladdin2007

Well-Known Member
I may be totally wrong,, but this part of the article in bold kinda felt like a hint to me....what do you guys think?....I hope Im wrong though really.

Staggs said much of what was included in the original plans will be incorporated into the final product and that the changes are “improving it on the margin.” He characterized the revisions as part of any creative project’s natural evolution. As an example, Disney cited Hong Kong Disneyland, where early blueprints included an area dubbed “Glacier Peak” that was eventually replaced with a section themed around the company’s Toy Story film franchise.
 

gmajew

Well-Known Member
I know, but I feel like all of those movies from the renaissance deserve rides/shows and etc.

I agree all of those movies should have rides but I don't think I will ever see it. They will be doing lion king in 2092 or whatever for the 100 year anniversary
 

gmajew

Well-Known Member
I may be totally wrong,, but this part of the article in bold kinda felt like a hint to me....what do you guys think?....I hope Im wrong though really.

Staggs said much of what was included in the original plans will be incorporated into the final product and that the changes are “improving it on the margin.” He characterized the revisions as part of any creative project’s natural evolution. As an example, Disney cited Hong Kong Disneyland, where early blueprints included an area dubbed “Glacier Peak” that was eventually replaced with a section themed around the company’s Toy Story film franchise.

I love the toy story movies hut I feel they have been done enough at the parks right now. Maybe they incorporate the area and the speedway and do cars land?
 

aladdin2007

Well-Known Member
I love the toy story movies hut I feel they have been done enough at the parks right now. Maybe they incorporate the area and the speedway and do cars land?

My thought exactly, but after reading it I couldnt help but think that was a hint. theres enough toy story everywhere, surely they have something else to go on, pixar in fantasyland would not excite me, but we dont know yet of course just talking on a hunch here. And to some of the previous posts, does it have to be a franchise guys?....
 

BrerFrog

Active Member
I love the toy story movies hut I feel they have been done enough at the parks right now. Maybe they incorporate the area and the speedway and do cars land?

Carsland is supposed to be a part of Pixar Place's expansion, I don't think it will come to MK.

And that Toy Story land in HK looks quite bland.

Based on posts by people who claim to know the plans, this ride has something to do with franchises that already were a part of the expannsion.

And to some of the previous posts, does it have to be a franchise guys?....

Not necessarily, but that seems to be the case based on comments on this thread.
 

Grizzly Hall 71

New Member
I think most of us posted (at least I did) what is finally being realized by Disney.

1) it was too girl sided. Only good for if you have a family of all girls...hmm I might know someone that fits that...

2) HP would play a role in Disney having to make adjustments. HP is non gender bias. Disney needs to taylor to everyone as HP just stole 2% of attendant.

So true. But a lot of others seemed to think the FLE would appeal to everyone :rolleyes:.


Yeah right!
 

stitch2008

Member
My thought exactly, but after reading it I couldnt help but think that was a hint. theres enough toy story everywhere, surely they have something else to go on. And to some of the previous posts, does it have to be a franchise guys?

Why not? I'd love to see something totally original come in. Just wonder what it could be.:shrug:
 

Grizzly Hall 71

New Member
i may be totally wrong,, but this part of the article in bold kinda felt like a hint to me....what do you guys think?....i hope im wrong though really.

staggs said much of what was included in the original plans will be incorporated into the final product and that the changes are “improving it on the margin.” he characterized the revisions as part of any creative project’s natural evolution. As an example, disney cited hong kong disneyland, where early blueprints included an area dubbed “glacier peak” that was eventually replaced with a section themed around the company’s toy story film franchise.


it is the mattehorn!!!
 

gmajew

Well-Known Member
Carsland is supposed to be a part of Pixar Place's expansion, I don't think it will come to MK.

And that Toy Story land in HK looks quite bland.

Based on posts by people who claim to know the plans, this ride has something to do with franchises that already were a part of the expannsion.



Not necessarily, but that seems to be the case based on comments on this thread.

Carsland at the studios has been talked about on boards but where has it been hinted at by Disney?
 

Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.

Back
Top Bottom