BrerFrog
Active Member
Can we get a hint? Is it a huge e ticket or is it some d or c?
If everyone is going to like it.... it has got be an E, right?
I mean, there were complaints about TLM being called a D by WDI.
Can we get a hint? Is it a huge e ticket or is it some d or c?
Aladdin might work. The carpets in Adventureland are supposedly nothing to worry about, as rumors say that the spinner will be converted to Dumbo 2, and the carpets themselves are getting shipped off to Tokyo DisneySea.
If everyone is going to like it.... it has got be an E, right?
I mean, there were complaints about TLM being called a D by WDI.
The only thrill ride that will fit is so clear. After all my wishing it's finally coming true.
THE MATTEHORN IS COMING!!!!!
I also thought of Matterhorn when I read about a thrill ride, even if I am sure it will not happen. It just naturally came to mind.
I know, but I feel like all of those movies from the renaissance deserve rides/shows and etc.
I may be totally wrong,, but this part of the article in bold kinda felt like a hint to me....what do you guys think?....I hope Im wrong though really.
Staggs said much of what was included in the original plans will be incorporated into the final product and that the changes are “improving it on the margin.” He characterized the revisions as part of any creative project’s natural evolution. As an example, Disney cited Hong Kong Disneyland, where early blueprints included an area dubbed “Glacier Peak” that was eventually replaced with a section themed around the company’s Toy Story film franchise.
I love the toy story movies hut I feel they have been done enough at the parks right now. Maybe they incorporate the area and the speedway and do cars land?
I love the toy story movies hut I feel they have been done enough at the parks right now. Maybe they incorporate the area and the speedway and do cars land?
And to some of the previous posts, does it have to be a franchise guys?....
I think most of us posted (at least I did) what is finally being realized by Disney.
1) it was too girl sided. Only good for if you have a family of all girls...hmm I might know someone that fits that...
2) HP would play a role in Disney having to make adjustments. HP is non gender bias. Disney needs to taylor to everyone as HP just stole 2% of attendant.
My thought exactly, but after reading it I couldnt help but think that was a hint. theres enough toy story everywhere, surely they have something else to go on. And to some of the previous posts, does it have to be a franchise guys?
i may be totally wrong,, but this part of the article in bold kinda felt like a hint to me....what do you guys think?....i hope im wrong though really.
staggs said much of what was included in the original plans will be incorporated into the final product and that the changes are “improving it on the margin.” he characterized the revisions as part of any creative project’s natural evolution. As an example, disney cited hong kong disneyland, where early blueprints included an area dubbed “glacier peak” that was eventually replaced with a section themed around the company’s toy story film franchise.
it is the mattehorn!!!
Why not? I'd love to see something totally original come in. Just wonder what it could be.:shrug:
Carsland is supposed to be a part of Pixar Place's expansion, I don't think it will come to MK.
And that Toy Story land in HK looks quite bland.
Based on posts by people who claim to know the plans, this ride has something to do with franchises that already were a part of the expannsion.
Not necessarily, but that seems to be the case based on comments on this thread.
no not when the article stated the budget was only increased slightly. I know many would love to see the matterhorn in the MK, I think it would be cooler though at Epcot.
Yeah I know, I was joking .
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.