nibblesandbits
Well-Known Member
Agreed. This is the part I have a problem with. Not the actual extension of the refurb. I hope this extension makes SSE look even more amazing. I'm excited to see what they've done to enhance it.Good point, I guess I am just looking at this situation from the construction aspect only - not from the PR department or Media department etc...
Still I would think it would have been in their best interest to correct the information released to the public if it was indeed incorrect from the get go. That is the only part of this entire situation that I have a problem with. As far as the refurb itself goes, heck let them take a year if that is what they need to have the end product be done properly.
As soon as SSE is re-opened all of this will be forgotten anyway so you are correct that in the end this really will not matter. Until that happens though we need to critique every move they make - that is after all what we do best!!
But don't wait 3 weeks before something is due to be open (when you already know it's going to take way more than 3 weeks to accomplish what needs to be done) to announce that the ride is going to be down for longer. That is the part that's uncalled for. I don't care if Ops was being optimistic on the dates. They should have known way before now that what they had listed as their reopening dates weren't going to pan out for a while ago. It's a matter of common courtsey (ok, I totally know I spelled that wrong.) which maybe the company doesn't care about, however, by not caring, it does make them look a little bad. Bad enough to impact the company right away, no, not totally, however, if they keep handling refurbs in this manner, keep waiting to announce refurbs until the last moment or keep waiting to announce extensions in refurbs, that stuff starts to build up and then people do remember that.