• The new WDWMAGIC iOS app is here!
    Stay up to date with the latest Disney news, photos, and discussions right from your iPhone. The app is free to download and gives you quick access to news articles, forums, photo galleries, park hours, weather and Lightning Lane pricing. Learn More
  • Welcome to the WDWMAGIC.COM Forums!
    Please take a look around, and feel free to sign up and join the community.

SPOILERS: Snow White live action (March 21, 2025 release)

LittleBuford

Well-Known Member
I believe that this weekends drop off of 66% leads credence that the movie itself is weak. Word of mouth of a better production than the rumor mill speaks of would have persevered.
If you have any interest in watching it (whether now or when it reaches Disney+), I hope you’ll do so and report back here with your thoughts. It was quite a bit better than I thought it’d be.
 

WorldExplorer

Well-Known Member
I guess the Disney Apologists and the supposed Modern Audience weren't enough to keep this afloat.

I guess the Modern Audience didn't see themselves in the characters. I don't know why they wouldn't though, they are just as insufferable as Rachel Zegler.

My favorite review quote so far is that Zegler is a very impressive actress because she had to pretend to be someone people actually like (in the movie).
 
Last edited:

DKampy

Well-Known Member
It was quite a bit better than I thought it’d be.
I saw Snow White today…. I thought it was much better than I expected…. I thought I would hate the film as I did not care for the trailer at all… in fact the only reason I saw the movie in theaters was because I did not want the trolls to win…. I actually thought it was pretty good…. Changing enough for modern audiences while keeping the core story in tact

It is interesting that the most irritating aspect of the trailer for me were The CGI Dwarves…. In the context of the movie they work….in fact may have been the heart of the movie
 

LittleBuford

Well-Known Member
It is interesting that the most irritating aspect of the trailer for me were The CGI Dwarves…. In the context of the movie they work….in fact may have been the heart of the movie
They worked better than I thought they would, but I didn’t find them as compelling as you did. For me, the heart of the movie was the love story. I was surprisingly moved by Dopey’s arc, though.

Glad you enjoyed it!
 

DKampy

Well-Known Member
They worked better than I thought they would, but I didn’t find them as compelling as you did. For me, the heart of the movie was the love story. I was surprisingly moved by Dopey’s arc, though.

Glad you enjoyed it!
Dopey is who I was referring to in particular…. I was intentionally being vague… did not realize I was in the spoiler thread… for whatever reason I found his arc very heartwarming
 

mickEblu

Well-Known Member
I find that really unlikely, because all the other individuals in those leaked photos (from what I can tell; it's possible one or two are standins) are also in the final film as the bandits. Moreover, the same actors feature in this tweet:



I Googled a couple of them, and they are actors rather than stunt performers.


My knee Jerk reaction to seeing a cast with every race under the sun is that it is forced, inauthentic and DEI box checking. Particularly if it has to do with a remake or if the film is taking place during a time period / setting that would have made that mix highly unlikely. Now with something like Turning Red for example it doesn’t come across that way because one - it’s an original story and two - it’s based in early 2000’s Toronto which is a melting pot. Wish to me felt like what this cast of characters probably would have felt like or feel like assuming they re just stunt doubles for the actors.
 

LittleBuford

Well-Known Member
My knee Jerk reaction to seeing a cast with every race under the sun is that it is forced, inauthentic and DEI box checking.
Perhaps it's worth trying to move past that reaction and see if the characters are actually any good in the context of the story for which they've been developed. (In this case they have been reduced to nonentities, so we'll never know how well they would have worked.) Kneejerk reactions are seldom productive.
 
Last edited:

mickEblu

Well-Known Member
Perhaps it's worth trying to move past that reaction and seeing if the characters are actually any good in the context of the story for which they've been developed. (In this case they have been reduced to nonentities, so we'll never know well they would have worked.) Kneejerk reactions are seldom productive.

Things either feel authentic or they don’t. Clearly, I’m not in the minority.
 

LittleBuford

Well-Known Member
Things either feel authentic or they don’t. Clearly, I’m not in the minority.
To assume (as you seem to be) that people are staying away from this film because of its multiethnic casting seems quite the stretch. If audiences are so opposed to previously all-white IPs being made more diverse, they would boycotted Wicked too.

All of the leads in Snow White—Zegler, Gadot, Burnap, and the CGI dwarfsremain, well, white.
 

mickEblu

Well-Known Member
To assume (as you seem to be) that people are staying away from this film because of its multiethnic casting seems quite the stretch. If audiences are so opposed to previously all-white IPs being made more diverse, they would boycotted Wicked too.

All of the leads in Snow White—Zegler, Gadot, Burnap, and the CGI dwarfsremain, well, white.

I’m not saying that it’s why Snow is bombing. I’m saying that many people who feel like I do are staying away from these types of movies in general. The box checking casting is just a byproduct of the real issue. Wrong priorities and inauthenticity.
 
Last edited:

LittleBuford

Well-Known Member
I’m not saying that it’s why Snow is bombing. I’m saying that many people who feel like I do are staying away from these types of movies in general. The box checking casting In movies or settings where that feels inauthentic is just a small part of the issue. It’s the priorities and inauthenticity itself that’s the core issue.
Bridgerton, I feel, offers an effective retort to your stance, but it’s probably the sort of show your kneejerk reaction would keep you from watching.
 

mickEblu

Well-Known Member
Bridgerton, I feel, offers an effective retort to your stance, but it’s probably the sort of show your kneejerk reaction would keep you from watching.


I’ve never seen it. There’s always exceptions of course. Some films, shows etc can overcome those obstacles for a variety of reasons. I’m guessing it’s well produced and probably caters to a more narrow target audience unlike a a Disney movie or any movie released in theatres in general that needs to appeal to a broader audience to be successful. Particularly when the budgets are so big.
 

LSLS

Well-Known Member
Honestly I'm surprised seeing some say it was better than they expected. My thoughts on why it's so low in it's reviews is that the opposite would be true.
 

Sirwalterraleigh

Premium Member
Again, wishing that this thread were limited to actual and informed discussion of the film’s content (true to its title) is not the same as wanting that discussion to be favourable.
The only informed discussion that matters is it was thoroughly rejected and a huge loss.

Disney is a for profit Corp…not an arthouse

The big picture is never a “bad take”

Some of the other movies we kicked around…like elemental, Mufasa and even the little Hallee (which was still a fail but not so obvious)…definitely was a better place for shutting down the financial discussion
 

Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.

Back
Top Bottom