MerlinTheGoat
Well-Known Member
There's no proof this replacement started "well before" February 2020. In fact, the disarray and mixed messages since it was announced suggests otherwise.
The final "no going back now" stamped approval and announcement was indeed strategically timed with the events occurring at the time. Had these events not occurred, the announcement at the very least would have come at a considerably later date. It was still too early in development and only the IP swap was basically settled on.Imagine believing this.
But they were indeed preparing ways to rid of Splash for quite a while. Even if it wasn't in a ready and mature enough state to be publicly announced when they did. The ride has been in peril for a while now. Iger was still with Disney at the time and was effectively a secondary CEO in all but name up until the end of 2021 (which is a major reason park fans shouldn't think his return will improve the experience). He was more responsible than Chapek was for pushing the overhaul and early announcement. Had Iger been fully gone and Chapek fully in charge at the time, it's extremely plausible it would have been delayed or even canned. But it WAS a project that began life well before it was announced.
Believe whatever you like though.
Agreed. But the announcement dropped before he had sole control of the company, so we're stuck with it. If they were going to cancel it, they would have done so by now. It's too late and the project is fully finalized and starting very soon. The best hopes are that the budget is high and kept out of the hands of the budget slashers, the salt mine concept is kept to a minimum (hopefully just a queue and backstory thing and not the interior scenes), they preserve the old animatronics and don't make it mostly video screens, and that the claims of the story being promising are true.If anyone was going to cancel the re-theme, it was Chapek.
Last edited: