LittleBuford
Well-Known Member
I don't even know who Freddy is. Is he the Disneyland CM who was tweeting about Splash Mountain last year?People here like depicting Freddy as an innocent puppy who didn’t do anything wrong.
I don't even know who Freddy is. Is he the Disneyland CM who was tweeting about Splash Mountain last year?People here like depicting Freddy as an innocent puppy who didn’t do anything wrong.
Yes.I don't even know who Freddy is. Is he the Disneyland CM who was tweeting about Splash Mountain last year?
I have been pretty active in the Splash Mountain threads and don't recall anyone championing him as an individual. One can broadly agree with his view that a retheme is in order without liking him. I certainly wouldn't imply (as he seems to be doing in the tweet you shared) that those who enjoy the current version are racist.Yes.
Almost everyone who calls Splash Mountain a racist ride today was in love with the attraction over the last 30 years. This is why I struggle with this discussion so much. It's all or nothing for many who themselves rode it hundreds of times over the last 3 decades.I certainly wouldn't imply (as he seems to be doing in the tweet you shared) that those who enjoy the current version are racist.
This is 100% Disney's approach of "Let's lock SotS in the basement and pretend it's some horrible monster that can't see the light of day" for decades backfiring hard. They can't throw it on D+ or re-release it without facing extreme backlash. Their only option is to remove the theme
They were selling 30th merch two years ago. It’s not hardRemember that time Chapek claimed Splash is 60 years old and showcases ”happy slaves”? Good times.
While I generally agree, in all honesty, it’s a bit of a blessing in disguise.. cause I ‘DO NOT’ have any faith in Chapek greenlighting a proposal that restores Journey Into Imagination back to it’s former glory anytime soon.. and that’s a ‘Major’ issue. Particularly when what screwed it up/ed people off to to begin with was transforming a once timeless, classic, distinctly Disney attraction into a forgettable, poorly thought out, dated film IP themed experience and then shoehorning Figment into it all once complaints about it hit (rightfully so, I should add). The Inside Out proposal they had planned with Figment as a simple cameo was quite literally ‘99’s ‘Journey Into YOUR Imagination’ (inspired by the Honey I Shrunk franchise & Medfield College universe of films) all over again. Absolutely ridiculous & tone-deaf.. To me that’s like if they transformed Haunted Mansion into a mainly screen based High School Musical themed experience within a high class mansion (as opposed to first trying to improve the marketing on the OG attraction & adding some newly enhanced spfx, props, scenery to it.) Then due to complaints, shoehorned the ghosts in to interfere with some of the cast/scenes and said “Hey look, we brought the Ghosts/Haunted Mansion back!”… yeeeah, right..Again, the fact that this unnecessary "makeover" for splash mountain is getting priority over Journey Into Imagination and the fixing of the yeti (who has been broken for decades BTW) is disgusting.
"Happy Slaves"? There are no slaves in the attraction or the film for that matter... it is set during the reconstruction after the slaves had been freed...Remember that time Chapek claimed Splash is 60 years old and showcases ”happy slaves”? Good times.
The film certainly perpetuates the “happy slave” narrative, despite its Reconstruction Era setting. It was criticised for this back when it first opened."Happy Slaves"? There are no slaves in the attraction or the film for that matter... it is set during the reconstruction after the slaves had been freed...
Lack of proper context at the beginning of the film explaining that it indeed took place in the reconstruction era. That’s really what’s caused the majority of the problem I think. People not looking at it through the proper/intended context (see “viewing/taking things out of context”) Walt & the rest of the filmmakers behind it originally envisioned/intended.The film certainly perpetuates the “happy slave” narrative, despite its Reconstruction Era setting. It was criticised for this back when it first opened.
I have been pretty active in the Splash Mountain threads and don't recall anyone championing him as an individual. One can broadly agree with his view that a retheme is in order without liking him. I certainly wouldn't imply (as he seems to be doing in the tweet you shared) that those who enjoy the current version are racist.
I actually meant that the African Americans depicted in the film behave as happy slaves even though they are technically free. The whole plantation is portrayed as an idyllic setting in which black people exist only to serve white people and are very happy doing so.Lack of proper context at the beginning of the film explaining that it indeed took place in the reconstruction era. That’s really what’s caused the majority of the problem I think. People not looking at it through proper/intended context (see “viewing/taking things out of context”) and what Walt & the rest of the filmmakers behind it originally envisioned/intended.
This I agree with, though I would add that most people aren’t aware that it’s a racist or privileged position, which is what makes it so pernicious.those who are dismissing the reasoning behind the changes due to their own nostalgia and dismissing the views of the Black community is a racist tactic, steeped in privilege.
You love splash, I love splash - but we both know the ride has to be changed.
Chapek is an embarrassment.Remember that time Chapek claimed Splash is 60 years old and showcases ”happy slaves”? Good times.
This I agree with, though I would add that most people aren’t aware that it’s a racist or privileged position, which is what makes it so pernicious.
Wouldn’t this line of dialogue be him transitioning into telling the stories of Br’er Rabbit? “Where the humans and the critters co-mingled with eachother”? That isn’t in reference to the time of slavery, it’s in reference to a time before that.
It absolutely is up to interpretation. And many chose to interpret that line as him speaking about slavery. I agree with your interpretation.Wouldn’t this line be him transitioning into telling the stories of Br’er Rabbit? “Where the humans and the critters co-mingled with eachother”? This isn’t in reference to the time of slavery, it’s in reference to a time before that.
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.