Splash Mountain re-theme announced

Status
Not open for further replies.

Brer Oswald

Well-Known Member
I recommend having your eyes checked. What you see is a lot bigger than a chip. It's the full weight of the physiological and psychological impact of centuries of institutionalized white supremacy in America.
Brer Rabbit? The African American folk character? The character that inspired fictional anthro characters for centuries to come? This is a symbol of white supremacy to you?
C822A51D-26AC-40AF-946C-9BC0C1F75C2D.png
F7D86BD6-95C0-42B5-9FDF-CDF12F1BC346.jpeg

Go back to Twitter with your fictional blind arguments. The Brer Rabbit stories are a landmark of entertainment, literature, and storytelling, brought to us by Africans and African Americans. And you have the AUDACITY to say it’s white supremacy to like these stories?

I hate this phrase, bet “get educated” or get out. Seriously. I’m over this false narrative and revisionist history. And for what? Twitter likes? Give me a break.
 
D

Deleted member 107043

Sue_Vongello

Well-Known Member
Brer Rabbit? The African American folk character? The character that inspired fictional anthro characters for centuries to come? This is a symbol of white supremacy to you?
View attachment 505863View attachment 505864
Go back to Twitter with your fictional blind arguments. The Brer Rabbit stories are a landmark of entertainment, literature, and storytelling, brought to us by Africans and African Americans. And you have the AUDACITY to say it’s white supremacy to like these stories?

I hate this phrase, bet “get educated” or get out. Seriously. I’m over this false narrative and revisionist history. And for what? Twitter likes? Give me a break.

Again I hate being a broken record but the theme and message of Song of the South is literally anti-racist ... so I just don't get it ...
 

ImperfectPixie

Well-Known Member
Brer Rabbit? The African American folk character? The character that inspired fictional anthro characters for centuries to come? This is a symbol of white supremacy to you?
View attachment 505863View attachment 505864
Go back to Twitter with your fictional blind arguments. The Brer Rabbit stories are a landmark of entertainment, literature, and storytelling, brought to us by Africans and African Americans. And you have the AUDACITY to say it’s white supremacy to like these stories?

I hate this phrase, bet “get educated” or get out. Seriously. I’m over this false narrative and revisionist history. And for what? Twitter likes? Give me a break.
African folklore...the characters originated in Africa.
 

Brer Oswald

Well-Known Member
I don’t think the film is racist. I don’t think the film is “not racist” either. It’s not a black & white issue. It’s easy to treat it as one if you have zero knowledge on the subject. But for that, I say inquire about it, or stop talking about it.

The film has a complicated history. A lot of issues arise from the production of the film. Some from the film itself. And, you can argue, from the Uncle Remus book itself (although marking the entire book as “racist” isn’t the way to do it either).

The idea that the Brer Rabbit character, the original tales, or even the ride itself is racist is ridiculous and it needs to stop being regurgitated. The ride is being replaced simply by association of the film. That was clear from the announcement.

Stop calling people who like Brer Rabbit and the ride racist simply because they like something that is inherently not racist. It’s a despicable thing to do. I expect that from the circle jerks on Twitter, where people will destroy anyone for fame, attention, and likes. But I expect better from here.

Also, to the other side, stop denying the systemic racism of the US, as well as racism in general, while praising the ride in the same breath. It makes us other fans of the ride look bad by association of you, and racism clearly exists. SotS is not innocent, so cut it out with that.

If you have nothing more to say than to provoke the person that disagrees with you, just stop. I’m tired of it. I’m tired of having to defend something that shouldn’t even need to be defended. My friend, who’s black, has been called every slur in the book for liking it. It’s gross. He’s tired of it. Just let the ride die in peace and the new one take its place.
 

Sue_Vongello

Well-Known Member
Why do you think that’s the message of the film? Because Uncle Remus is sympathetically portrayed? (These are genuine questions; I’m not trying to be rhetorical.)
I’m not saying there aren’t problematic elements like alot of movies from that same era but the message of the movie is literally friendship across races/barriers/social classes/ages ... that’s the message. I just hate when there are blanket statements that label the movie racist at its core because that’s way too black and white and ignores the basic message of the film.
 

Phil12

Well-Known Member
I don't know why the people who support the retheme need to be so rude towards those that DON'T.
Perhaps it's because some folks who have been repeatedly shown authenticated facts that prove beyond any doubt that Song of the South is steeped in overt racism and that the attraction Splash Mountain also contains some of the same racist tropes, refuse to accept the overwhelming evidence. What you may perceive as snark or rudeness may just be the cold, hard facts of the matter presented without any sympathy for the loss of comfortable racist attitudes.

Disney has accepted the evidence and is making changes, yet there are still a few people who refuse believe the facts of the matter. But, I suppose it should not surprise me. After all O.J. Simpson was acquitted on two counts of murder back in 1995. And it doesn't really matter that a few people still think that Splash Mountain is fine with its current theme. A few people think the moon landings were faked. You can't really reason with those folks and as a practical matter, there is no need to reason with them.

Systemic racism continues to be a real problem in the USA and it doesn't help matters when long standing overt racism is accepted, overlooked or ignored. TWDC is taking steps to correct some of their misdeeds with the re-theme of Splash Mountain and the new disclaimer stating that "These stereotypes were wrong then and are wrong now."

These actions are baby steps, but nevertheless, steps in the right direction. I'm looking forward to additional actions by TWDC as well.

 

LittleBuford

Well-Known Member
I’m not saying there aren’t problematic elements like alot of movies from that same era but the message of the movie is literally friendship across races/barriers/social classes/ages ... that’s the message. I just hate when there are blanket statements that label the movie racist at its core because that’s way too black and white and ignores the basic message of the film.
That isn’t the message I came away with when I used to watch the film as a child. Nor is it what contemporary reviewers noted. Sure, Uncle Remus is shown getting along well with the white characters, but the same is true of Mammy in Gone with the Wind.

For what it’s worth (and I believe you know this anyway), I don’t think Song of the South is racist at its core. But it is guilty of perpetuating a romanticised stereotype of plantation life in which the black characters remain slavishly devoted to their white employers. To my mind, the message of racial harmony hardly seems possible when one group is so clearly (and seemingly happily) subservient to the other. And lest anyone think I’m judging a historical product harshly or unfairly, it’s worth remembering that similar criticisms were expressed about the film back when it was first released.
 
Last edited:

Sue_Vongello

Well-Known Member
And it doesn't really matter that a few people still think that Splash Mountain is fine with its current theme. A few people think the moon landings were faked. You can't really reason with those folks and as a practical matter, there is no need to reason with them.

This is why she thinks some people are rude about their arguments. You cannot present opinions as fact, which I’m sure you know. Saying SotS is unequivocally racist is an opinion, not a fact. The Disney company did not set out to make this movie because they wanted to tell a racist story. Sure there are problematic elements like most things did from that era - but saying it’s flat out racist and saying anyone that disagrees is an idiot - it’s wrong, period. You’re entitled to your opinion, and you may have points but it loses its steam when you state it as “facts.” And no, just because others may share your opinion does not make it a fact.

Additionally, to say “a few people” are fine with the theme the way it is now is also not fact, it’s actually closer to misrepresentation because the evidence we do have (petitions, for example, and circumstantial evidence from online communities) support the contrary ... it’s the overwhelming majority that do not think there are problems with the attraction. I’m not talking about systemic racism or what should happen to the theme ... just pragmatically talking about your statement of “a few people” ... which by all available evidence is not correct. Now if you want to say you disagree with the majority that’s fine or in your opinion to say the majority is evidence of a problem in this country, fine ... but you can’t say a few people and if you concede it’s the the majority then you can’t say well the majority is wrong or all of them are racist (or even that all of them are white, because I personally know many minorities that signed the petition to keep it just the way it is).

My point is this ... there are arguments for both sides but just because someone doesn’t agree with your opinion doesn’t mean they are “ignoring facts” or are morons that think “the moon landing is fake” ... you can make your points but frame them in ways that don’t distract from your message by misrepresenting information or belittling others.
 

Sue_Vongello

Well-Known Member
That isn’t the message I came away with when I used to watch the film as a child. Nor is it what contemporary reviewers noted. Sure, Uncle Remus is shown getting along well with the white characters, but the same is true of Mammy in Gone with the Wind.

For what it’s worth (and I believe you know this anyway), I don’t think Song of the South is racist at its core. But it is guilty of perpetuating a romanticised stereotype of plantation life in which the black characters remain slavishly devoted to their white employers. To my mind, the message of racial harmony hardly seems possible when one group is so clearly (and seemingly happily) subservient to the other. And lest anyone think I’m judging a historical product harshly or unfairly, it’s worth remembering that similar criticisms were expressed about the film back when it was first released.

Absolutely you’re right ... but also Disney makes romanticized versions of everything. I wouldn’t have expected Disney to make a kids movie about the harsh reality of slavery ... I get that’s problematic in some ways but I also don’t think the intention of the filmmakers was to insidiously get African American people to see the value of obeying their masters.

And yeah to me, the theme was wrapped around - Johnny wanting to run away, couldn’t deal with his problems ... it’s only when he made friends with Remus, Toby, and Ginny did he learn from their experiences how to cope, grow, and find the joy in his life. Those friendships from different backgrounds, ages, and experiences are what helped and shaped him. So the message was seek out those friendships and experiences because you may learn something. Or that’s what I saw anyway ...
 

Chi84

Premium Member
Finding someone else that shares your opinion does not make it a fact. And also opinions can’t be wrong, that’s why they are opinions and not facts.

You don’t know me either - so I’d check yourself before saying something doesn’t surprise you about me.

But thanks for attempting to talk about this in a civil, logical, and non judgemental manner - it really makes your arguments more valid.
But when it’s Disney’s opinion about Disney’s own product, which they no longer make available, their opinion carries more weight than others. Also, I don’t subscribe to the notion that opinions can’t be wrong. They can be, if they are based on misinformation or are contrary to established facts.

People express opinions on subjects they know nothing about. Those opinions are baseless and carry no weight.
 
Last edited:

Sue_Vongello

Well-Known Member
But when it’s Disney’s opinion about Disney’s own product, which they no longer make available, their opinion carries more weight than others. Also, I don’t subscribe to the notion that opinions can’t be wrong. They can be, if they are based on misinformation or are contrary to established facts.

People express opinions on subjects they know nothing about. Those opinions are baseless and carry no weight.

That’s fair but also in that article it wasn’t stated as Disney’s opinion. It was the writer’s interpretation of their position. But regardless I get your point in that they aren’t releasing it because they feel a certain type of way about it.

That’s a difficult argument because again we need to know the film maker’s intent. Was it their intent to make a racist film or was any problematic elements unintentional and a product of the time? Could they treat it like the rest of the films of the time and put a disclaimer on it? These are questions.

One of the closest pieces of evidence we have in regards to intent is this interview with an African American animator who worked with Walt and the studio close to this same time period ... while he doesn’t believe the film to be racist he does have a balanced view.

https:///2020/07/black-animator-defends-song-of-the-south-ne1/

Also thank you for making your points and being civil about the discussion.
 

LittleBuford

Well-Known Member
Absolutely you’re right ... but also Disney makes romanticized versions of everything. I wouldn’t have expected Disney to make a kids movie about the harsh reality of slavery ... I get that’s problematic in some ways but I also don’t think the intention of the filmmakers was to insidiously get African American people to see the value of obeying their masters.

And yeah to me, the theme was wrapped around - Johnny wanting to run away, couldn’t deal with his problems ... it’s only when he made friends with Remus, Toby, and Ginny did he learn from their experiences how to cope, grow, and find the joy in his life. Those friendships from different backgrounds, ages, and experiences are what helped and shaped him. So the message was seek out those friendships and experiences because you may learn something. Or that’s what I saw anyway ...
I don’t think Walt Disney or anyone else involved in Song of the South had bad or racist intentions. Rather, I think they unwittingly (or perhaps negligently) allowed the film to incorporate and perpetuate certain well-established tropes that were themselves problematic and already regarded as such even at the time. The result is well-meaning but in some regards deeply flawed, and those flaws have only grown more visible with time. Were it not a children’s film, I suspect it wouldn’t have been disavowed to the extent that it has: adult audiences are generally trusted to approach problematic old movies with an informed and critical eye.

It’s a shame, because the animated sequences are wonderful, as is much of the music.
 
Last edited:

LF85

Well-Known Member
This is why she thinks some people are rude about their arguments. You cannot present opinions as fact, which I’m sure you know. Saying SotS is unequivocally racist is an opinion, not a fact. The Disney company did not set out to make this movie because they wanted to tell a racist story. Sure there are problematic elements like most things did from that era - but saying it’s flat out racist and saying anyone that disagrees is an idiot - it’s wrong, period. You’re entitled to your opinion, and you may have points but it loses its steam when you state it as “facts.” And no, just because others may share your opinion does not make it a fact.

Additionally, to say “a few people” are fine with the theme the way it is now is also not fact, it’s actually closer to misrepresentation because the evidence we do have (petitions, for example, and circumstantial evidence from online communities) support the contrary ... it’s the overwhelming majority that do not think there are problems with the attraction. I’m not talking about systemic racism or what should happen to the theme ... just pragmatically talking about your statement of “a few people” ... which by all available evidence is not correct. Now if you want to say you disagree with the majority that’s fine or in your opinion to say the majority is evidence of a problem in this country, fine ... but you can’t say a few people and if you concede it’s the the majority then you can’t say well the majority is wrong or all of them are racist (or even that all of them are white, because I personally know many minorities that signed the petition to keep it just the way it is).

My point is this ... there are arguments for both sides but just because someone doesn’t agree with your opinion doesn’t mean they are “ignoring facts” or are morons that think “the moon landing is fake” ... you can make your points but frame them in ways that don’t distract from your message by misrepresenting information or belittling others.

This might be the greatest post I’ve ever read here.. Awesome response!
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.

Back
Top Bottom