Giss Neric
Well-Known Member
I'm certainly gonna miss singing
"pretty good, show us your balls."
"pretty good, show us your balls."
Okay, I just woke up to find this thread having 100+ pages more than when i went to sleep last night.
Can anyone bring me up to speed? Or is it just 100+ pages of everyones opinion?
Nope. I'm asking what specifically about the ride elements are connected to racism.
Then Disney should be consistent with their message. If it’s about inserting a more profitable IP then fine, but if they use the occasion to trumpet their wokeness, be consistent with all the other glaring “problems” they have throughout the rest of their parks. Also they should be consistent about addressing the terrible record of the Chicoms who they’ve gotten in bed with for the $$$.I don’t deny that it’s a slippery slope. But updating a 30-year old ride to include a beloved princess by millions of people isn’t “canceling” anything. In fact, it’s opening up important conversations, if only some would listen.
Nope. I'm asking what specifically about the ride elements are connected to racism.
Then Disney should be consistent with their message. If it’s about inserting a more profitable IP then fine, but if they use the occasion to trumpet their wokeness, be consistent with all the other glaring “problems” they have throughout the rest of their parks. Also they should be consistent about addressing the terrible record of the Chicoms who they’ve gotten in bed with for the $$$.
Disney doesn’t care about anything other than the $$$.
Then Disney should be consistent with their message. If it’s about inserting a more profitable IP then fine, but if they use the occasion to trumpet their wokeness, be consistent with all the other glaring “problems” they have throughout the rest of their parks. Also they should be consistent about addressing the terrible record of the Chicoms who they’ve gotten in bed with for the $$$.
Disney doesn’t care about anything other than the $$$.
I guess the sad part is that most people haven't seen or care about the movie. My kids have no clue who the heck Brer Rabbit is. Nor do they ask when they get off the ride. They do however giggle and laugh and have a good time. That's the point when on vacation. Changing it doesn't solve any social problems, it only helps Disney get this "Song of the South" issue off their back. And now is the perfect time to do so.
This was a long time coming, truthfully the Dixie Landings name change was more irritating to me.
Did they give a timeline at all? I didn't read through all 138 pages, but didn't see this addressed in the article unless I missed it? Splash just had such a long refurbishment. Is it an immediate reno like it's not opening up until it's done, or is it planned for next year, or what?
Nobody is saying it’s solving society’s ills. It is, though, removing problematic elements that the company has known for years, to use a popular IP that will sell more merch.
It’s not complicated. Disagree with their decision, fine, but please stop trying to claim Disney is trying to do more than they actually are doing.
I would argue that most people are not thinking or contemplating what Brer Fox is saying when they are going up that hill. I have been on that ride 100 times and wouldn't be able to quote that line.The climax of the ride is based on one of the more controversial of the “Uncle Remus” stories.
Just do a google search for the line:
"Do anything you want with me – roas' me, hang me, skin me, drown me – but please, Br'er Fox, don't fling me in dat brier-patch"
to understand why it’s considered controversial by many.
I find it ironic when the rage machine kicks in over the perception of manufactured rage.
I guess the sad part is that most people haven't seen or care about the movie. My kids have no clue who the heck Brer Rabbit is. Nor do they ask when they get off the ride. They do however giggle and laugh and have a good time. That's the point when on vacation. Changing it doesn't solve any social problems, it only helps Disney get this "Song of the South" issue off their back. And now is the perfect time to do so.
This was a long time coming, truthfully the Dixie Landings name change was more irritating to me.
Only yourself and others here flailing in their arguments are claiming the “woke” garbage. By accounts of insiders, they knew the problematic elements of the ride for years, hence having artwork and a loose plan in place. It was fast tracked due to recent events.
Of course they care about money; they’re a business. I wouldn’t expect less.
As a business that holds these IPs, they can decided to change what and when they want. In this instance, they chose Splash. As mentioned, it’s likely other changes will come. That is their right.
Did they give a timeline at all? I didn't read through all 138 pages, but didn't see this addressed in the article unless I missed it? Splash just had such a long refurbishment. Is it an immediate reno like it's not opening up until it's done, or is it planned for next year, or what?
The “angry mob” here is conflating this terribly, and it’s extremely sad. Also at times, disturbing.
Well if you're the CEO why don't you share the info. If you're looking for others on this forum to tell you when it is going to happen or details then Disney is in a whole lot of trouble because it would imply that they have one of the most clueless leader ever. Most CEO's would pick up a phone and call the person in charge of the parks to find out information not look for construction info on a forum.@wdwmagic Can we have a construction/info/etc. thread for those who wish to avoid the debate?
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.