For me, I love how rough it is! The “nostalgia” might be part of it, but the roughness makes it feel like such a good coaster in my opinion. Smooth coasters that are fast, like Velocicoaster, are great, but where Space Mountain lacks in speed it makes up for it in sharp turns, drops, and overall roughness.Nostalgia is the only reason people still like it.
Fair enough.For me, I love how rough it is! The “nostalgia” might be part of it, but the roughness makes it feel like such a good coaster in my opinion. Smooth coasters that are fast, like Velocicoaster, are great, but where Space Mountain lacks in speed it makes up for it in sharp turns, drops, and overall roughness.
Disneyland's Space Mountain > TRON > WDW's Space Mountain
I voted Space Mountain for length alone.
Yeah, I'm pretty unimpressed with Tron. It's fine but it's not particularly thrilling, just fast, which RnRC does better. And it's so short. The bikes are a neat idea but not particularly comfortable having to crane your neck. I can say it's not as rough as SM, so it's got that going for it... for now.I voted Space Mountain for length alone. Tron was so underwhelming IMO.
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.