I haven't heard much about this after Chapek left but I assume this is down the toilet with him right? I would surely hope so! It's literally the worst idea I ever heard.
Its essentially MMRR.I haven't heard much about this after Chapek left but I assume this is down the toilet with him right? I would surely hope so! It's literally the worst idea I ever heard.
Its essentially MMRR.
A ride that can be swapped out or changed easily because there are very few 'permanent' fixtures.
Not exactly sure why its such a bad idea in your opinion. Disney should change & update rides from time to time.
It was proposed during the Iger years.I haven't heard much about this after Chapek left but I assume this is down the toilet with him right? I would surely hope so! It's literally the worst idea I ever heard.
There aren't any fixtures that would need to be removed. Changing the programming is much simpler than tearing up the building.MMRR is a bit more complicated than that because of the moving parts, especially in the scene that completely changes. It would also require either reprogramming the trackless vehicles or replacing every scene in the ride with something that used the exact same movement as previously existed in MMRR. It would be a quicker swap than something like Splash Mountain, but it's not really a black box attraction.
I think a black box attraction would be almost inherently boring for a theme park -- it would be hard to build something easily swappable that wouldn't provide essentially the same experience just watching a video at home. As much as I dislike Smugglers Run, it at least has the Millennium Falcon cockpit. A black box attraction almost by default couldn't even offer that; it would probably feel like something they could do in a mall.
Because its the same as sitting home and watching tv. Why should I pay for theme park admission to watch television? I find the screens flat and uninspiring. The lack of depth makes me very aware that I am not immersed. Whenever they do implament these screens they are always seemingly poor quality and have distorted colorations as well. I feel like screens should be used ONLY on simulators or for background animations and no further. MMRR was kinda disappointing to me, at least in the middle part, but It did have Daisey Duck's dance studio, The engine, Some landscapes, The tunnels. Mickey's Car, and was done with enough humor to make it enjoyable. It's not the best ride and far inferior to GMR since so much was removed to put up a simple wall, but at least it had 3-D figures. This black box concept is essentially Ninjago at legoland without the star throwing. It's not Disney level to me. It's like Six Flags Level, and of lower quality than the Spelunkers at SFOT and Justice League at Magic Mountain and Great Adventure etc. I think that you lose a lot when you cheapen a ride to the same level as like a McDonalds toy promotion. Limited time only! This seems more suited for Downtown Disney or a mall. I could find you nine non disney Dark rides that are superior to this idea right now including Ghost Hunt at Lake Compounce, Timber Mountain and Calico at Knotts, The Old Mill at Rye Playland (a boardwalk!), and Yosemite Sam's Gold Rush River that was at Six Flags Over Texas.Its essentially MMRR.
A ride that can be swapped out or changed easily because there are very few 'permanent' fixtures.
Not exactly sure why its such a bad idea in your opinion. Disney should change & update rides from time to time.
It was proposed during the Iger years.
Changing the programming is much simpler than tearing up the building.
Why is ease so important? What happened to immersion and depth? I feel like Spongebob looking at the patties in Krabby o Mondays going "where's the love???"That's what I said. MMRR would be easier than something like Splash Mountain, but it's not the same as a simple black box attraction that could be flipped potentially overnight.
I don't think the poster you're replying to is insisting that it is important - only that it's essentially the premise of the Black Box ride and that MMRR is very nearly a similar concept in its execution.Why is ease so important? What happened to immersion and depth? I feel like Spongebob looking at the patties in Krabby o Mondays going "where's the love???"
That's kinda how I feel. It will take up space where a much better thing could go, like *cough a new Great Movie Ride cough* (I wish!)I don't think the poster you're replying to is insisting that it is important - only that it's essentially the premise of the Black Box ride and that MMRR is very nearly a similar concept in its execution.
It seems pretty clear that the Black Box attraction was proposed so that they could try to cash in on hot properties without having to commit to full, new-build attractions and the construction time and expenses that come with them. Which, as has been said, is interesting in theory, but in practice would almost certainly be an exercise in shorting the guests on real immersive attractions that deserve to stand in the parks as permanent installations.
There aren't any fixtures that would need to be removed. Changing the programming is much simpler than tearing up the building.
It's not even about if they have the money. Its just... why...?With Mermaid apparently gone due to the black mold (and probably that part of the complex with it), they have a strong insentative to redo the Courtyard. The Disney Junior show is out of date (referencing properties that have changed shows in the years since it opened), and Launch Bay is nothing more than M&G space at this point. All of it could be replaced with the black box as planned - but does Disney have the money to do so? I doubt it.
They would much rather cut a check for updating something like this than for building actual new attractions, which take many millions of dollars and years to construct.Disney takes 20+ years to update single videos (Harvest, China, Philharmagic, etc), so the idea that they would be constantly updating an entire screen-based ride is really funny
I'm sure they would. Just as easy as the TSM holiday overlays!They would much rather cut a check for updating something like this than for building actual new attractions, which take many millions of dollars and years to construct.
For as much as people hate (rightly) on Chapek for nickle and diming and park reservations, its not like he came in with the best hand dealt to him...Starcruiser, Epcot remake, Genie, pushing Disney into politics, falling castmember standards, broken rides/effects, price increases, Galaxies Edge cutbacks and more were all on Igers watch. Outside the parks, Iger oversaw the development of almost every movie released under Chapeks term, as they were in production long before Chapek took over. Im sure I am missing more...they must have known Universal was doing far more than just Harry Potter and there is still no plan in place for that competition.It was proposed during the Iger years.
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.