You can’t do that without filming a new movie because the scents of Cali won’t sync up with the world version an apples and oranges (pardon the pun) problem…it’s 2 different formats. If they refilmed the entire 2 movies, and combined them, they could “pick and choose” the parts needed at random…I don’t think the 2 movies can be combined maybe I’m wrong?
I wonder if the orange groves in the film still exist or if they've grown houses like almost all of the Orlando vicinity? Soarin' over CA might me more of historical documentary now than a present day flyover!
To demonstrate @osian's point, here's a comparison of the Golden Gate Bridge as it appears when viewed from the side in the original Soarin' film and how it actually looks:
Yes, but you’re swinging in on an angle and it looks more normal as opposed to that awful Eiffel Tower that’s pointed towards Switzerland and Italy…no one is arguing that the technology and the screen shape is to blame. That’s 100% true. People are saying it’s a bad show and bad optics. That’s also 100% true.
Actually, not everyone seems to be aware that the issue has been there from the start, which is why I was providing a visual to demonstrate the point made by @osian.
Thanks. I hadn’t done it and thought they used a flat screen before updating it. Probably because I misread it somewhere. I have no idea why I thought that was the case…
I always liked when the fighter jets passed overhead and your vehicle rocked from it.
Could definitely see them filming a new ending.
You must not have paid very good attention to the preshow.
I smell an upcharge…
It was actually a very windy day in the Bay Area that day, so the bridge did, in fact, curve.
The Taj takes the cake. It looks like something out of a PS2 video game circa 2001. I don't know how they couldn't render it better than that and, if they couldn't, why even include it?
