Mickeyfan's Reviews
@NigelChanning09
In concept, this is something I’m not flipping out over but I like it. It’s a charming idea that mostly works. Coco fits Mexico like a glove, but just a fountain feels way too small for a Coco inclusion.
Creativity: 7/10 - It’s a fountain with a statue of Miguel and Dante. It’s a bit basic but I appreciate making it a dancing fountain which really helped your creativity here.
Realism: 6/10 - I gave you a huge knock here for three reasons. The location in your art blocks basically the entire meat of the pavilion inside the pyramid in addition to further crowding the already cramped Mexico passage, the dancing aspect seems far too big for the scale of the project, and the projection mapping element uses a very complex effect for something that could be done with something far simpler.
Detail: 8/10 - You laid everything out here just fine. I didn’t see an issue and the concept art definitely added to it. A map would have added further to this for me
Presentation: 7/10 - The picture at the beginning could have been centered and the Dante picture could have been reduced in size to fit with the rest of the project. Nitpicks, yes, but nitpicks can add up, especially in a project as short as this.
Total: 28/40
@Pi on my Cake
There’s a theory of communication called Expectancy Violation Theory. It states that a person will walk into an interaction with an expectation of how it goes and when that expectation gets violated, the person either gives into the violation or denies it and ends the interaction. When I saw the art at the top of the post, I had a very low expectation, that was violated and you made me give in. This is great.
Creativity: 10/10 - The joke is presented so cleverly and witty and it adds to the land in a way that improves it and feels like it should have always been there while not being super obvious. That’s how you do an addition.
Realism: 10/10 - Replaces a useless space? Check. Cheap? Check. Fits the land? To a tee.
Detail: 9/10 - There might have been a bit too much in explaining the joke but it still works with the gag.
Presentation: 8/10 - A forum post yes but this feels like a pitch from a monotone corporate executive. Did I cackle at the citation? Absolutely. It’s a presentation that fits the gag of the project. It’s just so clever, so witty, so dry. Awesome presentation.
Total: 37/40
@Outbound
I was skeptical but you really made it work. You went for a sort of joke project and yet, it works really well. Presentation is key here. We’ll get into this because I do have some thoughts about this in my breakdown.
Creativity: 9/10 - Extra points for doing something outside of Disney. I love the idea of a chocolate river for Hershey Park and while it is very Willy Wonka, the idea of it fitting into this new made up, fakey, almost disingenuous DIsney rip-off backstory. This is just so freaking good.
Realism: 8/10 - This is exactly what I think some try-hard Imagineer wannabe would propose for a smaller regional park like Hershey Park in all its complexity and effects (I really hope this was intentional or else this just makes me look like a jerk).
Detail: 10/10 - The explanation of just how totally elaborate and yet functional the effect as a whole is and just how disgusting the chocolate river would look in real life, all of it. The satire is strong with this one and that’s what sent this project over the top.
Presentation: 10/10 - I wasn’t really pleased that you went into the blog presentation again but you went a step further and you did a parody podcast, in addition to updating the blog as a whole with some new gags. You freaking killed it. I don’t know where you’re gonna go from here honestly. The bar was set for a 10/10 presentation last week. You just went and launched yourself 10 feet above the bar. I can not wait to see where you’re going to go from here.
Total: 37/40
@Pufflefan
Let’s have a brief discussion on research. There are a ton of very good sources on upcoming areas and attractions available on WDWMagic alone. I’m assuming you used Zootropolis since that was the name of the film in some European countries. However, a simple Google search would have told you the name of Shanghai’s Zootopia land in English will be “World of Zootopia”
Creativity: 8/10 - Extra points for doing something original with the prompt and using a land that’s currently under construction. I question the elephant when just the fox and rabbit would have kept things really simple and clean, especially for just a gag that we’ve seen done several times.
Realism: 9/10 - Elephant aside, I absolutely see this. It’s something super simple but it really fits into the land and Zootopia as a big city.
Detail: 7/10 - You were on the right track here. Almost everything was going right but you flubbed the landing a bit. What about the fountain at night was different? The art has little purple arches over the statues for night. What are they? Please explain to me how the fountain transforms itself from day to night from a show perspective. By that I don’t mean the mechanics of it: it’s a fountain. I mean what exactly is different from day to night?
Presentation: 6/10 - I had a really hard time figuring out what to score this. I’m assuming you went the same route as Outbound by satirizing a blog but the method of presentation didn’t work. Google Slides is amazing, don’t get me wrong, but this is your 3rd Slides Presentation in 3 projects with a style of presentation that didn’t quite fit your method of presentation. That combined with the research issue I talked about in my opening really brought this score down for me. And on the nitpick side, Disneyland. Only one capital letter. If that was intentional to fit your presentation, that’s on me.
Total: 30/40
@JokersWild
For as small as this project is, I think there's some stuff to talk about here and praise. I do think Cars Land needs a bit more water, and this just works really well. Overall, Jokers jumps into the competition with a raging start.
Creativity: 9/10 - You did something creative with Cars. I despise the Cars franchise just because it’s such a black hole of creativity and this just sounds so peaceful and nice and relaxing while still fitting the land really well.
Realism: 10/10 - The area is so perfectly Disneyland and Carsland I’m shocked it doesn’t already exist.
Detail: 8/10 - It’s a single paragraph but everything I need to know about this is right here. Location, setting, environment. If there were some concept art, I’d have given you a full 10 here.
Presentation: 6/10 - You said yourself to give you a hammering on presentation and while I don’t think that you deserve a 3/10, it’s a simple form post without much formatting or reference image with good grammar.
Total: 33/40
@Basketbuddy101
BasketBuddy at it again. This is my personal winner for the round because this is SO GOOD
Creativity: 10/10 - An entire backstory for such a simple area, but one that adds to Frontierland so well and makes it that much more detailed and realistic.
Realism: 9/10 - It feels too big for Disneyland which is the biggest knock here but scaled down, I really see this working and being a really beloved new addition like the Rivers of America waterfalls are.
Detail: 10/10 - On the border of too much detail but none of it was useless and I think the project would be lesser because of it missing.
Presentation: 9/10 - Near flawless presentation. The slides are clean without too much information overload, points are developed, the presentation flows extremely well, and I can only give praise.
Total: 38/40
This is an incredibly difficult challenge. It seems so simple but to come up with something unique that fits is SO HARD that I have to give kudos to everyone’s project for successfully executing it.