Thrill
Well-Known Member
What adverse effects are you talking about?
People are saying that Potterland will make Disney's attendance jump even more. That's been shown not to be true so far. And I've been hearing that argument over and over and its completely insane.
For the next year or two, maybe even three, Disney may lose a day per tourist on average. Consider an "average" visit to Orlando. Let's say it lasts a week, and they spend one day at Universal, one at SeaWorld, and the other five at WDW. It's possible that said trip does not change at all, and the tourist simply misses a few attractions at Universal in order to check out Harry Potter. At worst, one day at Disney is traded for one at Universal. Considering that it's about $5 a day after the fourth day, not a huge loss for Disney. Add a little more for dining and merchandise that is no longer being spent at Disney, and it becomes a little more severe. Honestly, I think one day per visitor is a little steep, seeing as I've heard a few reviews that say WWoHP isn't really something that has potential for too many repeat visits. I wouldn't be able to say based on firsthand experience, but it's possible that Universal's attendance dies down sooner than expected. Again, throw in the fact that Disney might not lose that day at all because the guest is going to budget that time at Universal a little bit differently to accommodate for WWoHP.
Some people around here are complete psychopaths when it comes to another park, especially UNI, upstaging WDW in whatever compacity. Some people blow a gasket if UNI has ANY kind of success. Before FJ opened some of you were already labeling it a disaster. Some of you were even trying to tell us there were no lines, when the backed up lines were all over the news. It's really mind blowing. WDW will always be the #1 resort. No matter what gains UNI makes. But that isn't going to stop UNI from being a more exciting park with better rides, if Disney doesn't get it in gear. I haven't heard one person say UNI would take WDW's spot.
If WWoHP is the type of success that Universal can repeat, they could very well take over as the best tourist attraction in Orlando, given that TDO doesn't open their wallets a little further. The problem is that this area is revolving around a franchise, and I remember the rest of IoA being a pretty immersive park, but it never put up those numbers. It seems like Harry Potter is the driving force behind the rise in attendance, not the attention to detail. As of right now, few franchises can help Universal repeat this type of success, and the biggest rival is in Disney's control. That's not to say that there will never be a Potter-sized franchise, but I doubt we'll see one emerge until after WWoHP's hype wears out, and I think that Disney will be a little bit more careful when the rights to large franchises are likely headed to competitors.