sublimesting
Well-Known Member
I have always been very disheartened that they don't and was shocked it wasn't part of the new refurb.
Yes... Hmm, do you happen to be "Big Disney Fan" from the Visions Fantastic forums? I know he did a lot of that. Very talented fellow.
Now, about the whole Tokyo think I agree. I think it should also have full 3D everything. NO MORE painted stuff on wood. It should be in 3D IMO. This goes for all FYL attractions. They should all get a refurb making it get a 3D upgrade.
Yes. Yes, I am.
Yes, they should. It's just too bad that the people in charge of WDW are notorious for putting the almighty dollar in front of everything else.
I meant on that issue....Don't mislabel me.:wave::lol: Fantasyland is going to be fantastic.Go look at that concept art again and tell me WDW is getting the shaft! :lol: And this is a D64 issue? :ROFLOL:
oh my! :lol:
There goes you over estimating the small, vocal, minority.Not getting Pinocchio is a blessing, not the shaft.
If they cloned Pinocchio this site would implode with the compliants.
There goes you over estimating the small, vocal, minority.
On the contrary, I think that populous would be pleased. I would be.
Me, too. If nothing else, it would give every park (not including HKDL) a Pinocchio ride.
There goes you over estimating the small, vocal, minority.
On the contrary, I think that populous would be pleased. I would be.
Key word, unofficial. :lookaroun:lol: And if it were tagged into something like the CURRENT FL Expansion, it would pacify those that think it's just a bunch of Meet and Greets.:shrug:*Looks at average ratings per age group in Unofficial Guides to Disneyland and Disneyland Paris*
:lookaroun
Uhhhh, I think Jake may have a point.
I really like Pinocchio.
A beautiful movie, instantly recognisable characters, great timeless storytelling in there, a true Disney classic. And what is more Disney than Jiminy Cricket and 'when you wish upon a star'?
I know only the Pinocchio ride in Paris. A good, solid darkride, but not a Peter Pan.
Whether WDW needs more Pinocchio - I can live without it, I am also always excited about anything Pincocchio.
Disney doesn't own the rights to that song... :lol: So, anything Disney is more Disney than that
What about the other European classic Disney movie that wasn't a flop?
101 Dalmations!
It's a travesty that considering all the attractions we have in Disney Parks worldwide based on Disney's Animated films, one of its greatest treasures, 101 Dalmatians has been featured so little. I would love to see a great attraction based on it one day.
Go look at that concept art again and tell me WDW is getting the shaft! :lol: And this is a D64 issue? :ROFLOL:
oh my! :lol:
No, it wouldn't be the small, vocal, minority. It would be many, many people, me included.There goes you over estimating the small, vocal, minority.
On the contrary, I think that populous would be pleased. I would be.
Yep. It is my personal opinion, but it seems to be one shared by many.*Looks at average ratings per age group in Unofficial Guides to Disneyland and Disneyland Paris*
:lookaroun
Uhhhh, I think Jake may have a point.
I disagree. It would be held up as a pinnacle of cost-cutting and cheapness. "They spent too much money on X. They should have spent it on Pinocchio" would be the complaint.Key word, unofficial. :lookaroun:lol: And if it were tagged into something like the CURRENT FL Expansion, it would pacify those that think it's just a bunch of Meet and Greets.:shrug:
For fun, here are the ride times of the Disneyland Resort and WDW Resort Fantasyland/Toontown dark rides;
Disneyland
Alice In Wonderland 3:40 minutes
Roger Rabbit's Car Toon Spin 3:35 minutes
The Many Adventures of Winnie The Pooh 3:20 minutes
Pinocchio's Daring Journey 2:55 minutes
Peter Pan's Flight 2:15 minutes
Snow White's Scary Adventures 2:15 minutes
Mr. Toad's Wild Ride 2:10 minutes
WDW
The Many Adventures of Winnie The Pooh 3:00 minutes
Peter Pan's Flight 2:50 minutes
Snow White's Scary Adventures 2:40 minutes
Wow! Talk about role reversal. :lol:No, it wouldn't be the small, vocal, minority. It would be many, many people, me included.
The ride is bad. I've had first hand experience with it. It is substandard in almost every area.
Yep. It is my personal opinion, but it seems to be one shared by many.
I disagree. It would be held up as a pinnacle of cost-cutting and cheapness. "They spent too much money on X. They should have spent it on Pinocchio" would be the complaint.
A Pinocchio dark ride would be great. A clone of what is out there would not.
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.