GoofyRacer11
Active Member
Ok, so forgetting about the dolphins who have been in captivity so long they've forgotten how to feed themselves...
Should places like Sea World be allowed to take in more dolphins and whales that haven't yet forgotten how to feed themselves and teach those animals to be dependent on their keepers too?
Also, not sure how much I buy the "we're doing valuable research" argument. For one, it contradicts the argument that the dolphins are already too acclimated to captivity to be release. If you've already completely altered the animal's pattern of behavior, what good is research going to do besides tell you about how captive, trained animals behave? For another, I'd be be interested to see if Disney can point me to a peer-reviewed journal where there's published research that cites the Living Seas animals.
Personally though, I think we should continue to keep animals like this in zoos and tanks because they're fun to look at. As long as they're not mistreated, animals don't have the same right to freedom humans do. I just take issue with some of the bogus arguments defenders of captive cetaceans use to justify their livelihood. Sea World keeps dolphins and killer whales not to save them, not to make scientific discoveries, but because people will pay good money to see them. It creates jobs and makes kids smile. I'm OK with that. You should be too.
Why don't they? Who are we to say whether or not they have that right?