You're screaming about sources and whether something is over/under budget.
I think you're losing focus of the big picture here and that's the head executive of this project out.
Had the rollout been a success and remained within the original scope, he'd have been rewarded. That's what executives do. However, this isn't the case.
For whatever reason he's gone, you cannot view this as good news. I'm curious how Wall Street will react.... Because I'd sense blood in the Water if I am them.
I agree. Massive project with tendrils into many facets of the operations. No doubt much of the infrastructure would have been replaced on a similar timeframe whether NextGen was involved or not. Everything from Point of Sale, data centers, reservation system, resort control systems, etc. This project touched tons of infrastructure that is already on lifecycle replacements.My recollection from when it initially broke was an initial $800million to $1 billion technology initiative which was dubbed 'NextGen' which funded several product initiatives.. including the talking characters, the interactive games, interactive attractions, RFID widgets, and more. Disney later acknowledged the WDI initiative saying it was about driving new concepts of how technology could change the theme park experience. Later as XPass became more in focus, it became synonymous with NextGen.. then MM+ and the later MDE concepts.
That was a ton under one 'umbrella' - and the company has never (to my knowledge and following of the news) acknowledged any sort of breakdown of the spend, lifespan of that spend, or differentiated between the R&D phases and productization/rollout. The $1 billion dollar number has just been a catch-all.
I also think it's obtuse to think ANY technology program that starts as pure R&D with a budget set over 5+ years ago would make it all the way through to implementation at the spend number eyeballed at the start.
The billion dollars has never been an set aside appropriation - it would have showed up in the financial reports if it were. It can not have been anything beyond a strategic action with a COMMITMENT to continue investing at the specified pace for the life of the program.
So I look at it as a company's 5-10 year plan and their commitment to invest in that plan. What their 'budget' would be would be handled on a much more specific objective level.
I guess you missed the point. Most retail operations have "data mining" processes to increase their sales. I can't imagine anyone that said they wouldn't be using aggregate customer information to improve sales and service. Rewards / loyalty cards are not always the same as credit cards. My bet is you have them and are being "data mined" on a daily manner.Yes, but Disney touted it as a way to enjoy everything they have to offer. We have heard numerous rebuttals on this board and on many others saying Disney was not data mining. No no no they are not holding information, and many of us called BS.
And no, I have no credit cards.
Now they'll start withdrawing all of the extra Cast Member positions!
I'd expect more layoffs to be honest. When the head of a fluff department that was inconsequential to running day to day operations "retires" it doesn't bode well to the rest of the crew attached to the program.Yes. I am sure the use of technology will eventually lead to lower employment if Disney does not expand. That is what it should do. However if Disney expands as they should, that will lead to more employment. It is a trade off and in the long run will lead to more attractions for us and employment for everyone. As I previously stated the technology will get people to spend more of their time on property increasing attendance at the parks and profits which will lead to the expansion we all want.
Yeah because Universal would never lay anyone off...I'd expect more layoffs to be honest. When the head of a fluff department that was inconsequential to running day to day operations "retires" it doesn't bode well to the rest of the crew attached to the program.
My friend says it's already happening at Guest Relations at the parks since they moved that department from operations to NGE. Hopefully those people have places to go back to in the company. Or Universal.
I'm not screaming about anything other than wanting facts. Too much hyperbole and crap floats around masquerading as fact around here. I have no idea why he's leaving, but I can give you a reason that meshes with the known information better than your conspiracy. He decided he wanted to leave months ago. They asked him to stay on until the project was complete. The main rollout is now done and he's giving a 2 month notice facilitate a smooth transition to next person.
I agree. Massive project with tendrils into many facets of the operations. No doubt much of the infrastructure would have been replaced on a similar timeframe whether NextGen was involved or not. Everything from Point of Sale, data centers, reservation system, resort control systems, etc. This project touched tons of infrastructure that is already on lifecycle replacements.
I guess you missed the point. Most retail operations have "data mining" processes to increase their sales. I can't imagine anyone that said they wouldn't be using aggregate customer information to improve sales and service. Rewards / loyalty cards are not always the same as credit cards. My bet is you have them and are being "data mined" on a daily manner.
But yes, Lutz was the primary guy leaking it ahead of others
I have no problems with Disney knowing what I spend on while at Disney. Yes this allows them to market directly to me because they know what I like. This is the same as chase tracking my spending with their different credit cards. So what they give me lots of rewards.
Now I will tell you one of the best things about magic bands and the charging using the bands. During my April trip they emailed me my detailed spending. This allowed me to track every cent I spent and where I spent it. To me that is great to know. I have no problem with Disney knowing this and keeping it private. I know my bank tells the government all my info but at least I can hope Disney doesn't. All I know the government gets is my total spending at Disney because it's charged but not the individual amounts and location.
Oh they do and have, but they definitely look much more stable. Their recent reinvestments into their property have generated increased profit and attendance. Whereas our "recent reinvestment" hasn't generated any increase in attendance and our profits are only from artificially increasing the cost of everything across the board, targeting high-end affluent Guests with upcharge experiences. How much is breakfast at Sci-Fi compared with other similar set priced buffets or family style breakfasts?Yeah because Universal would never lay anyone off...
If you love Disney, they will love you back. #yahwehHonestly, I don't care what you think.
There's absolutely no guarantee of that in the least....Yes. I am sure the use of technology will eventually lead to lower employment if Disney does not expand. That is what it should do. However if Disney expands as they should, that will lead to more employment. It is a trade off and in the long run will lead to more attractions for us and employment for everyone. As I previously stated the technology will get people to spend more of their time on property increasing attendance at the parks and profits which will lead to the expansion we all want.
Haha. Magic wands instead of magic bands. That would be frightening. Funny to watch though.Didn't a bunch of Disney management quit and go to Universal last year?
I'd love to see the outrage on the boards from both sides if he also ended up there.
The designer of AHC.I am not shocked that the Senior Walt Disney Co. parks executive is leaving the company since he oversaw the development of MyMagic+.
I am more curious about who is going to replace Nick Franklin.
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.