Sentinel: Monorail crash: Disney did not follow manual

PhotoDave219

Well-Known Member
Original Poster
Jason Garcia and the Sentinel is piling on in Today's paper.

JasonGarcia said:
A spotter is 'strongly recommended' when backing up; Disney now has a new, stricter policy in wake of fatal July collision

By Jason Garcia

Orlando Sentinel

12:24 AM EST, December 22, 2009


The manufacturer of Walt Disney World's monorail trains warned against the kind of reverse driving that contributed to the system's first fatal crash this past summer, according to documents obtained by the Orlando Sentinel.

An operating manual written for the Disney trains by Bombardier Inc. warned that driving the vehicles in reverse "is a potentially hazardous operation even under the best conditions" and "strongly recommended" that an observer be stationed at the opposite end of a train whenever one is backing up.

The July 5 accident occurred as a Disney train was supposed to be moving off of the resort's Epcot loop at the end of a work day, a process that requires the train to move in reverse through a track switch and onto a short spur leading to one of the system's Magic Kingdom loops. But the track switch was not activated that night, so the train wound up reversing back down the Epcot loop instead, hitting another train and killing the second train's 21-year-old driver, Austin Wuennenberg of Kissimmee.

At the time of the crash, Disney's monorail policies did not require that someone be watching the back of the train being driven in reverse. So there was no spotter in place who could have warned the driver that the switch had not moved and the train was backing down the wrong track.

Disney said it had multiple other safeguards in place that night to monitor trains being driven in reverse. Yet on Sunday the resort instituted a new policy forbidding trains from backing up unless a spotter is watching the opposite end.

The policy is strict: Even a train that overshoots its stopping point by a foot or two as it pulls into a station cannot back up to align with the passenger gates until a spotter on the platform has given radio clearance.

Greg Hale, chief safety officer and vice president of worldwide safety and accessibility for Walt Disney Parks and Resorts, said in an interview Monday that the change is part of an ongoing effort to improve monorail safety. The July crash was the first fatal accident in the system's 38 years of operation.

"We've continued — and will continue — going through every scenario and making sure we have the best safety procedures we can," Hale said. "I think we feel confident we've taken every step that's prudent and will continue to do so."

The 20-year-old operating manual was unearthed by federal investigators examining the crash. The U.S. Occupational Safety and Health Administration and National Transportation Safety Board have each launched probes; OSHA is expected to release its findings within the next two weeks.

Representatives of OSHA and NTSB both said Monday that they would not discuss specifics of their reviews. "The investigation is continuing," OSHA spokesman Michael Wald said. NTSB spokesman Peter Knudson said his agency's investigation is expected to take about six more months or so to complete.

No one else was hurt in the July crash. It happened at about 2 a.m., with only six guests aboard Wuennenberg's train and no one aboard the other train.

Disney's current generation of monorail vehicles, known as Mark VI trains, were put into service in 1989. The vehicles were built by Bombardier based on specifications provided by Disney, which designed the trains.

Driving the trains in reverse can be dangerous because drivers in the front cab have a limited view of the track behind them. And reversing through a track switch is especially hazardous because traversing the switches requires drivers to manually override the trains' automated anti-collision systems, which rely on sensors built into the monorail's main track, or beam.

As such, the operating guide that Bombardier supplied with the trains includes the warning about reverse driving and the recommendation to use an observer. The disclaimer is printed in bold lettering immediately under the heading of a section titled, "Moving the train in reverse direction."

A spokeswoman for Montreal-based Bombardier would not comment.

Disney acknowledged that its policies at the time of the accident did not require an observer to watch the rear of trains that were backing up. But it said it had other safety policies in place designed to accomplish the same goal, including several specific measures for trains reversing through track switches.

For example, Hale said, there are a series of sensors that monitor the position of the locks that hold a switch in place and indicate which sections of track have power. That information is then displayed on a grid in the monorail's maintenance shop, where it is visible to the employee who controls the switches. When activating a switch, the employee is supposed to use that grid to verify that the track has actually moved from the loop to the spur or back again.

A similar grid is displayed on a console in the Transportation and Ticket Center, the monorail's central hub, for monitoring by the monorail's "central coordinator," who oversees the entire system by radio. But Disney's policies at the time of the crash did not require the coordinator to be positioned at that console; the resort has since begun requiring coordinators to remain there at all times.

Hale also said that most track switches — including the one linking the Epcot loop to the spur — are monitored by video camera. As with the track sensors, the video images are visible on monitors in the maintenance shop for the worker who activates the switches. And the moving of a switch, he said, requires a strict, step-by-step protocol of radio communication between the train driver, the central coordinator and the maintenance bay to ensure that everything is in position.

"We've got nearly 40 years of operating experience and of operating the entire monorail system, and we've evolved our procedures based on that collective experience," Hale said.

According to people familiar with details of the accident investigations, the chain of events leading to the crash began when the worker in the maintenance bay mistakenly radioed that it was clear for the train to begin backing up and transferring off the Epcot line — even though he had not realigned the track. The central coordinator's role was also in flux that night — an employee had gone home ill, so the job was being handled temporarily by a manager on his dinner break — so no one was at the console in the Transportation and Ticket Center.

The rule added Sunday, requiring spotters whenever a train is reversing on a track, applies to all reverse driving, not just during track switches. Hale said Disney's trains typically travel in reverse when they are being taken in or out of service and must transfer between tracks, when they slightly overshoot loading gates in a station, and during malfunctions that require rapid unloading.

Hale said the spotter's role can be filled by different employees depending on the situation, including workers on a station platform, drivers of a train on another beam, or by an extra employee dispatched to ride in the rear cab.

Jason Garcia can be reached at jrgarcia@orlandosentinel.com or 407-420-5414.

Copyright © 2009, Orlando Sentinel
 

828tnt

Well-Known Member
still such a horrible accident. it does make me wonder how in decades of doing such an act, there was not such an incident previously.

my prayers still go out to those involved.
 

deaconfan

New Member
A question for those who are familar with the monorails--could they not install cameras similar to those now in many automobiles that provide the pilot with a video feed of the area behind the monorail while in reverse?

It would seem that would be a viable redundancy to a spotter at a reasonable cost.
 

rock_doctor

Member
Sure there are tons of cheap WiFi cameras out there now a days. No wiring necessary only a power connection. The old mark 4s had a prism spyglass on the top of the train that would act as a rear view mirror i doubt something similar is not on the mark 6s. I would also love to get a copy of the manual, it would be an interesting read. Just love to gain knowledge that is not common knowledge.
 

Figment632

New Member
A question for those who are familar with the monorails--could they not install cameras similar to those now in many automobiles that provide the pilot with a video feed of the area behind the monorail while in reverse?

It would seem that would be a viable redundancy to a spotter at a reasonable cost.

I don't see why they don't do this?

Also why can't they be programed to automatically emergency stop if they detect something on the track.
 

Monty

Brilliant...and Canadian
In the Parks
No
Why does it take a tragic mishap to drastically change policy? (lawyers and money)
The answer is failure of imagination... People often can't fathom the potential for disaster in a given arena simply because it hasn't happened before. Almost every major disaster is followed up by lessons learned and revisions to policy to prevent similar occurances.

I was in an aircraft that crashed in the high Arctic in 1991. The same type of airplane [C-130 HERCULES] had been flying the same route for around 30 years without incident but suddenly ours crashed, killing four in the crash itself and the pilot later died of exposure. The lessons learned and policy changes that resulted made Arctic flights much safer for the future and vastly improved the equipment and training of Search & Rescue Technicians here in Canada.

Similarly, the WDW Monorail had been operating incident-free for around 38 years. While it is sad that the incident occured, it is a reality of human nature that we don't always recognise risks we've never seen come to fruition in the past. There will be lessons learned and policies changed and the monorail will ultimately be safer in future.

In a perfect world there would be no accidental deaths, no illness and every human being would die of old age quietly in their sleep after living rich, fulfilling lives.
 

jakeman

Well-Known Member
So to sum this up, a cause of the accident was a failure to incorporate the manufacture's recommended safegaurds into the operational SOPs 20 years ago.
 

PhotoDave219

Well-Known Member
Original Poster
Here we go again. :brick:

Like i said to a previous poster, the NTSB & OSHA reports are due soon. If you're no longer interested in the subject, don't read it.

Frankly.... I'm all for Disney being held accountable for the incident. I'm still appalled that the new VP of DAK was the former VP of Transportation... although i suppose it wont be as bad if they have two elephants collide. You don't promote people who have those sorts of accidents happen on their watch.
 

s8film40

Well-Known Member
Why does it take a tragic mishap to drastically change policy? (lawyers and money)

Unfortunately none of the changes have directly addressed the core issue causing the crash. The main factor in the crash was that there were two different people who were not paying attention to what they were doing. The driver can clearly see behind him while reversing using the three rearview mirrors, the only area not visible is the area directly behind the back cab. You can add all the spotters and cameras you want but it still requires people to pay attention, know what there looking for, and react appropriately.

These new spotters while they may add a very small layer of safety (assuming they are paying attention) will most certainly create some very long and unnecessary delays. For those of us that have ridden the monorail for a number of times know that a monorail needing to reverse it's position slightly in the stations is a pretty common thing. Now every time that happens that driver has to radio in that they need to back up two inches, the central coordinator has to position someone and have them radio in that it's ok to move the train, and then the driver is instructed to move in reverse. All of this just to move a train a matter of inches.:brick:
 

jakeman

Well-Known Member
Unfortunately none of the changes have directly addressed the core issue causing the crash. The main factor in the crash was that there were two different people who were not paying attention to what they were doing. The driver can clearly see behind him while reversing using the three rearview mirrors, the only area not visible is the area directly behind the back cab. You can add all the spotters and cameras you want but it still requires people to pay attention, know what there looking for, and react appropriately.

These new spotters while they may add a very small layer of safety (assuming they are paying attention) will most certainly create some very long and unnecessary delays. For those of us that have ridden the monorail for a number of times know that a monorail needing to reverse it's position slightly in the stations is a pretty common thing. Now every time that happens that driver has to radio in that they need to back up two inches, the central coordinator has to position someone and have them radio in that it's ok to move the train, and then the driver is instructed to move in reverse. All of this just to move a train a matter of inches.:brick:
How does that not help?

If the cause is an individual person not paying attention, then there is really no way to correct that.

By adding another spotter, at least now there is another set of eyes who sole task is to clear the backup.

Based on this information what would be your recommendation?
 

s8film40

Well-Known Member
How does that not help?

If the cause is an individual person not paying attention, then there is really no way to correct that.

By adding another spotter, at least now there is another set of eyes who sole task is to clear the backup.

Based on this information what would be your recommendation?

If you can't rely on someone to look out the rearview mirrors when backing up a monorail how can you rely on the same person to pay attention as a spotter. There just adding numbers to improve their odds of catching a problem. Keep in mind it took at least three people not paying attention to cause the accident. To me there are really only two options. One they could hire more skilled people instead of the bottom of the barrel people willing to accept $7.50 an hour, and put them through rigorous training. Or they could just automate the system.
 

Empress Room

Active Member
Frankly.... I'm all for Disney being held accountable for the incident. I'm still appalled that the new VP of DAK was the former VP of Transportation... although i suppose it wont be as bad if they have two elephants collide. You don't promote people who have those sorts of accidents happen on their watch.

Two words: workers' compensation.

Like it or not, it isn't a perfect world, and employees get killed every day at work (building skyscrapers, working in factories, constructing highways and, yes, driving trains and monorails). Each state has enacted workers' compensation statutes for precisely this reason; they compensate the injured or next of kin in the case of a death of the employee. It is also the exclusive remedy, which means that private litigation cannot be maintained or brought against the employer absent a very high and difficult standard - that the employer intended the harm or otherwise acted in willful disregard for the employee's safety. Given the thirty-eight year safety record of the monorail's operation, coupled with the facts of this case as they are now unfolding (inattention, mistaken belief, inexperienced employees involved), it is unlikely that Disney would be found to have intended the accident or otherwise found to have acted willfully with respect to the tragedy under the relevant statutes.

Having said that, it is too bad that serious accidents and deaths must occur before processes, procedures and machinery are redesigned or re-engineered. But that is precisely why airline travel is safer now than it was 40 years ago and why the designs of highways, dams and factories are better and safer now than in the past.
 

GrumpyFan

Well-Known Member
If the cause is an individual person not paying attention, then there is really no way to correct that.

By adding another spotter, at least now there is another set of eyes who sole task is to clear the backup.

Based on this information what would be your recommendation?

Adding another set of eyes, should in theory at least, help avoid the same kind of incident. However, from the sound of it, the policies they had in place were sound, they just didn't follow them to the letter, and there was one person who wasn't there. I'm going to speculate that fatigue played a major factor in the failure of those who were on duty. Ultimately, this was a chain of errors that rests on several people's failures to properly and safely do their job. The extra set of eyes being added to the policy will certainly help, but if anything can be learned from this incident it's that people are going to make mistakes, especially when they're tired and it's late at night.

I would recommend one or more of the following. 1) Operators and controller, be restricted to working no more than 6-8 hours in the train and on the control board. If possible, a night shift supervisor/safety officer should be there for late night operations. 2)The trains should have cameras for operating in reverse. 3)More Automation. The sensor system (MAPO) should be improved and made "smarter". I understand it has to be disabled for backing operations, this indicates to me that it's a "dumb" system, probably a bit out of date. They can and should look into upgrading/replacing it.
 

Mr.EPCOT

Active Member
The root problem is that they need to hire and cultivate personnel properly, from top to bottom of the department, or they need to make the system as automated as possible. All these added safety procedures will just add up to make the system inefficient and cumbersome, while not even really being effective and ignoring the real problem. Right now there are Cast Members who become complacent in their duties, and managers who don't have any real interest in the system beyond just serving their couple of years in the department, making some arbitrary change that superficially makes their time there look productive, and moving on and forgetting about the place. This is what needs to be fixed, and it's not happening.

If you have a competent and attentive Pilot in the chair, there's no reason you'd need a spotter.
 

CoasterKing

Member
Unfortunately none of the changes have directly addressed the core issue causing the crash. The main factor in the crash was that there were two different people who were not paying attention to what they were doing. The driver can clearly see behind him while reversing using the three rearview mirrors, the only area not visible is the area directly behind the back cab. You can add all the spotters and cameras you want but it still requires people to pay attention, know what there looking for, and react appropriately.

These new spotters while they may add a very small layer of safety (assuming they are paying attention) will most certainly create some very long and unnecessary delays. For those of us that have ridden the monorail for a number of times know that a monorail needing to reverse it's position slightly in the stations is a pretty common thing. Now every time that happens that driver has to radio in that they need to back up two inches, the central coordinator has to position someone and have them radio in that it's ok to move the train, and then the driver is instructed to move in reverse. All of this just to move a train a matter of inches.:brick:

If this can potentially save someone's life, then I don't mind a few minutes of inconvenience.

Also, if this would have been in place all along as it apparently should have been according to the manuals, then Austin would still be with us !!
 

Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.

Back
Top Bottom