GiveMeTheMusic
Well-Known Member
Except it's only been relatively recent since Disney Animation has been consistently churning out big hits like they were in "the good ol' days". In the 2000s, the films were either at best modest successes or outright disappointments (Home on the Range, looking at you).
Doesn't matter. Tangled was three years prior, and the lesson should have been learned. Why anyone in any division of Disney thought that a movie starring a princess with super powers wouldn't be a hit is beyond me, but that's not important. Some properties scream out for theme park tie-ins in advance, and Frozen was one of them. Home on the Range had zero park tie-in appeal - even in the Eisner glory years, that movie wouldn't have gotten something like a parade or a show.
It's their own fault they weren't prepared for it - and that extends to other divisions like DCP, who created nowhere near enough merchandise to satisfy demand. The company has become overly risk-averse, and that bit them on the butt with Frozen. It then happened again to DCP on a smaller scale with Guardians. Zero Groot merchandise. Awesome work, team!
Park management live in fear of losing their bonuses, and that's why no one is willing to take any risks. It took a Staggs directive to get Frozen Fun in the first place. Wrong, wrong, wrong.
Do it right, and do it right the first time. It's not rocket science, but it does seem to elude Disney on several levels.