Pleased to admit that I'm one of the ones that spent $25 soley for the AC. Even held annual passes on 3 occassions despite residing 500 miles away. Really think the beginning of the end was the opening of the Wildhorse Saloon, the closing of the Neon Armadillo, and the conversion of the NA to the BET Club. A lot of locals regularly were at the Neon Armadillo. I would typically spent the bulk of my eve at the AC and spend lulls at the NA.I've talked to enough people who would know, and all agree (even Lansbury admitted) the AdvClub was modestly profitable. Keep in mind any given night people bought $25 tickets and used them only at the Club. 8-Traxx was the #1 money-maker, with Mannequins not far behind, and Motion also holding its own. Comedy Warehouse and BET were the money-losers; CW because the shows were too short, BET because PI never seemed to click with its target audience.
I've talked to enough people who would know, and all agree (even Lansbury admitted) the AdvClub was modestly profitable. Keep in mind any given night people bought $25 tickets and used them only at the Club. .
Pleased to admit that I'm one of the ones that spent $25 soley for the AC. Even held annual passes on 3 occassions despite residing 500 miles away. Really think the beginning of the end was the opening of the Wildhorse Saloon, the closing of the Neon Armadillo, and the conversion of the NA to the BET Club. A lot of locals regularly were at the Neon Armadillo. I would typically spent the bulk of my eve at the AC and spend lulls at the NA.
I will not bash those that loved "their" club but it was not a huge moneymaker. First off the $25 dollar ticket was for admission to PI, not just the AC; so that does not count as an income source. Clubs make their money in alcohol sales. Enough people did not drink at AC, that was the problem. The people that loved the AC went to enjoy the shows and didn't drink enough to make it profitable.
I will not bash those that loved "their" club but it was not a huge moneymaker. First off the $25 dollar ticket was for admission to PI, not just the AC; so that does not count as an income source. Clubs make their money in alcohol sales. Enough people did not drink at AC, that was the problem. The people that loved the AC went to enjoy the shows and didn't drink enough to make it profitable.
Wow, you obviously know NOTHING about bar operations.
Cover charges are a necessary evil in any venue that provides entertainment. The 25.00 was EXACTLY that...a cover charge...albeit for several bars not just for a single venue. The 25.00 most definitely DOES count towards the income source of all the venues at PI.
Any successful nightclub that provides nightly entertainment must recoup those expenditures and usually it is through making the patrons pay the bill through a cover charge or exorbitant drink prices. The latter does more to repel customers than the former.
I agree cover charges are a required evil. With that being said, the $25 cannot be put on the books of solely the AC. It has to be split amongst all of the clubs no matter what club(s) the patron attended.
As for knowing nothing about bar operations you are right. But I know a lot about high end night club operations! YOU really should not make assumptions based on facts you think you know. After all your opinions are clouded by your love of a place that only a small portion of WDW visitors enjoyed. If you are interested we can compare real world experience in the ownership and operation of clubs and I bet my income statement will beat yours any day of the week.
To the poster who said the drinks were $9-11 dollars: so what? If more people would have drank in the clubs they would have been more successful.
The 25.00 most definitely DOES count towards the income source of all the venues at PI.
I'd guess BET.all this said, what was the least successful club ever at PI ???
I will not bash those that loved "their" club but it was not a huge moneymaker. First off the $25 dollar ticket was for admission to PI, not just the AC; so that does not count as an income source. Clubs make their money in alcohol sales. Enough people did not drink at AC, that was the problem. The people that loved the AC went to enjoy the shows and didn't drink enough to make it profitable.
Which just begs the question of why admission to the Adventurer's Club could not be obtained by purchasing a single club admission ticket. Disney should have been attributing the single club admission money to those clubs. Comedy Club Warehouse made sense because you could not spend the whole night there. I think it would be very interesting to know how much Disney studies the patterns of people holding multi-club admission tickets. I would not find it surprising at all if Disney knew people were buying multi-club admission to just attend the Adventurer's Club. A nice way to charge more for the one club without making the direct comparison.I agree cover charges are a required evil. With that being said, the $25 cannot be put on the books of solely the AC. It has to be split amongst all of the clubs no matter what club(s) the patron attended.
well, I did ask about that a few posts back. GREAT MINDS.....Which just begs the question of why admission to the Adventurer's Club could not be obtained by purchasing a single club admission ticket. .
i cant believe this thread is STILL active.......
There are a lot of things I have a hard time believing:
Like the clubs being closed, like no new activity on PI, like DTD getting its butt kicked by Citywalk, like the lack of a plan from Disney, like the total lack of leadership and incompetence from the people who ran PI into the ground.......etc.......etc.......etc....
But this thread still being active is not one of the things I have a hard time believing, in fact I am surprised its not more active.
i cant believe this thread is STILL active.......
From what I see this thread :snore: has changed ZERO over @ DTD Duckberg
i cant believe this thread is STILL active.......
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.