What you describe isn't unusual for DVC resorts or really any timeshare destinations.
Timeshares have much higher occupancy levels than traditional hotel rooms--even if the resort staff told you they are well under full occupancy. And since member dues are used to pay for the resort upkeep, Disney isn't going to throw hundreds-of-thousands of dollars into full room renovations and flat panel TVs whenever technology advances and guests' tastes change.
All your $25,000 paid for was the initial resort purchase. Upkeep is funded by member dues.
We stayed at the Beach Club Villas back in 2004--just 2 years after it opened--and our room was similarly run-down. Carpet doesn't hold up forever in any high traffic location (timeshares definitely qualify), guests bang the walls and furniture with their 40 lb suitcases, members over-stuff the rooms with too many occupants leading to people sleeping on kitchen floors and couches, etc.
SSR is approaching 5 years old so obviously there will be issues in some rooms.
Things like quality of housekeeping and bus service are within Disney's control. Those are worth complaining about. But maintenance issues are much harder to manage in the long run. Timeshares are designed to be at near 100% occupancy year-round. So when a departing guest damages a room, Disney has very little time to address the issues between guests. Yes Disney could probably be a little more proactive in addressing these issues. But invariably that would lead to higher member dues and longer wait times before guests can get into their villas.
I would never compare any of the DVC resorts to a Motel 6 but the Beach Club was certainly the most run-down of any we have stayed at. Ignoring any perceptions of how the resorts compare today, it's quite widely known that the materials used at BCV were the most inferior of all DVCs. Rehab schedules had to be severely accellerated to compensate for the wear and tear on guest rooms. Most people seem to be willing to look the other way, though, given the location of the resort. The good news is that BCV has gotten some attention in recent months but all maintenance is cyclical. Timeshares can carry the "new" label for a couple of months after opening. Beyond that it's entirely a question of how guests have treated indivdual rooms.
As for the claim that SSR is only at 65% occupancy--that's a load of rubbish. I called 3-4 weeks ago to try and book a room for the night of March 1st. Nothing available.
Timeshares have much higher occupancy levels than traditional hotel rooms--even if the resort staff told you they are well under full occupancy. And since member dues are used to pay for the resort upkeep, Disney isn't going to throw hundreds-of-thousands of dollars into full room renovations and flat panel TVs whenever technology advances and guests' tastes change.
All your $25,000 paid for was the initial resort purchase. Upkeep is funded by member dues.
We stayed at the Beach Club Villas back in 2004--just 2 years after it opened--and our room was similarly run-down. Carpet doesn't hold up forever in any high traffic location (timeshares definitely qualify), guests bang the walls and furniture with their 40 lb suitcases, members over-stuff the rooms with too many occupants leading to people sleeping on kitchen floors and couches, etc.
SSR is approaching 5 years old so obviously there will be issues in some rooms.
Things like quality of housekeeping and bus service are within Disney's control. Those are worth complaining about. But maintenance issues are much harder to manage in the long run. Timeshares are designed to be at near 100% occupancy year-round. So when a departing guest damages a room, Disney has very little time to address the issues between guests. Yes Disney could probably be a little more proactive in addressing these issues. But invariably that would lead to higher member dues and longer wait times before guests can get into their villas.
I would never compare any of the DVC resorts to a Motel 6 but the Beach Club was certainly the most run-down of any we have stayed at. Ignoring any perceptions of how the resorts compare today, it's quite widely known that the materials used at BCV were the most inferior of all DVCs. Rehab schedules had to be severely accellerated to compensate for the wear and tear on guest rooms. Most people seem to be willing to look the other way, though, given the location of the resort. The good news is that BCV has gotten some attention in recent months but all maintenance is cyclical. Timeshares can carry the "new" label for a couple of months after opening. Beyond that it's entirely a question of how guests have treated indivdual rooms.
As for the claim that SSR is only at 65% occupancy--that's a load of rubbish. I called 3-4 weeks ago to try and book a room for the night of March 1st. Nothing available.