Rumors. Musings. Casual.

TrainsOfDisney

Well-Known Member
Bob said it best - They want the family of 4 from Denver on their once-in-a-lifetime trip. But what they all have failed to realize is, they are making it so that the connections that were made by the previous generation aren't created in the newer generation.
They also failed to realize when you have the most popular theme park on earth, you should keep doing more of what your current visitors like - you don’t need to reinvent the wheel!
 

Willmark

Well-Known Member
[insert major company here]

Disney got complacent. Disney got too many MBAs who played it safe.

Disney spent too much to acquire “competitors”.

Disney stopped innovating and got lazy.

Disney rested on its laurels and expected to general growth by the same products to the same people instead of attracting a new customer base.

Disney is in need of a shakedown and several divestments badly.
In a way Disney is this currently:

Not that its going to suddenly explode but rather the underlying causes are all there for anyone who wants to look at it. Some simply don't.

The problems that brought down the Challenger were started from its earliest inception and flawed by many factors and by a number of key assumptions. Assumptions, that turned out to be catastrophic.

This is a case where wiki does a good job highlighting the chain of events. But of particular note in the Rogers Commission that investigated the "accident" there was a rogue agent, an agent provocateur if you will in Richard Feynman. I won't go into all the details, but he was particularly scathing of NASA and their "Go Fever" of getting up to 50 launches a year to their complete misunderstanding of what margin of safety actually means.

How this applies to Disney? A quote from Feynman himself:
"For a successful technology, reality must take precedence over public relations, for nature cannot be fooled."

Disney would be wise to heed that. The warning signs are all there, just a question of whether or not they want to see them.
 
Last edited:

pheneix

Well-Known Member
Original Poster
In a way Disney is this currently:

Not that its going to suddenly explode but rather the underlying causes are all there for anyone who wants to look at it. Some simply don't.

The problems that brought down the Challenger were started from its earliest inception and flawed by many factors but a number of key assumptions. Assumptions that turned out to be catastrophic.

This is a case where wiki does a job highlighting the chain of events. But of particular not in the Rodgers commission that investigated the "accident" had a rogue agent, an agent provocateurs if you will in Richard Feynman. I wont go into all the details but he was particularly scathing of NASA and their "Go Fever" of getting up to 50 launches a year to their complete misunderstanding of what margin of safety actually means.

How this applies to Disney? A quote from Feynman himself:
"For a successful technology, reality must take precedence over public relations, for nature cannot be fooled."

Disney would be wise to heed that. The warning signs are all there, just a question of when.
Oh my god… this is the example I’ve used about Disney for years.

The decline never happened. The business they have is melting apart in real time. All the stuff we warned about festered and festered and it’s going off at once.
 

Willmark

Well-Known Member
Oh my god… this is the example I’ve used about Disney for years.

The decline never happened. The business they have is melting apart in real time. All the stuff we warned about festered and festered and it’s going off at once.
So you're saying I'm right again? ;) Detractors (fans?) are going to be upset with you. /sarcasm.
 
Last edited:

pheneix

Well-Known Member
Original Poster
They also failed to realize when you have the most popular theme park on earth, you should keep doing more of what your current visitors like - you don’t need to reinvent the wheel!

The castle parks are a visitor destination like no other on earth. Ppl say they can never be a museum. Well normal ppl go because the mainstream appeal of their collective work stands the rest of time.

Don’t be cheap. Offer the new and the old.
 

IanDLBZF

Well-Known Member
They'll never shutter it. Worst case scenario they'll close a park one day a week to save costs, different park on different day, or even worse case, sell off the parks to a third party that they can license (like they do overseas)
If they sell to a third party, like what was rumored in the past when the rumors of them selling WDW to the Chinese came about, and said third party is based outside of the US, then we could have problems.
 

Sirwalterraleigh

Premium Member
Making vacations less of a chore would certainly help guest satisfaction
Agree

But from an operational standpoint…at least in Orlando…it’s not possible.

They lost the flexibility to handle their own crowds.

How? Bobs years of not building anything new…couple with bobs years of replacing old and calling it new…and lots of timeshare blocks.

You have almost the same attraction capacity now as you did in 2000…with a 25%+ increase in attendance.

Math works…but not when you use the the wrong numbers in the formula.

That battle was lost about 15 years ago…when they decided overcrowding would be a solid profit strategy with no repercussions in perpetuity.
 

GhostHost1000

Premium Member
Me reading this thread
1706742398758.gif
 

Willmark

Well-Known Member
Oh my god… this is the example I’ve used about Disney for years.

The decline never happened. The business they have is melting apart in real time. All the stuff we warned about festered and festered and it’s going off at once.
The Rogers Commission and Boisjoly's lectures on whistle blowing and ethics in leadership should be required for every MBA and they should not be allowed to graduate until they can prove they have absorbed the teachings (half joking.)

This sums up NASA and from what you are saying? Disney's issues? Potentially very much the same.

"An accident rooted in history"​

 

Sirwalterraleigh

Premium Member
They'll never shutter it. Worst case scenario they'll close a park one day a week to save costs, different park on different day, or even worse case, sell off the parks to a third party that they can license (like they do overseas)
I could probably craft the “due to overwhelming guest demand” blip on the website right now…
…but it will crash so no one will ever see it 🫣
 

Sirwalterraleigh

Premium Member
The Rogers Commission and Boisjoly's lectures on whistle blowing and ethics in leadership should be required for every MBA and they should not be allowed to graduate until they can prove they have absorbed the teachings (half joking.)

This sums up NASA and from what you are saying? Disney's issues? Potentially very much the same.

"An accident rooted in history"​


That’s funny because I was jsut rereading part of the Roger’s commission history on the anniversary the other day…

Very similar correlation regarding mistakes…where they attempted to tell people what they saw wasn’t the case because a pre-determined, inflexible “strategic” plan that wasn’t realistic
 

Willmark

Well-Known Member
You have almost the same attraction capacity now as you did in 2000…with a 25%+ increase in attendance.

Math works…but not when you use the the wrong numbers in the formula.
You mean like this forumala?
The Drake Equation
N= R * F * Ne * Fl * Fi * Fc * L


Drake was a great scientist, but as he notes its simply an organizing principal for the equation (and by extension thought exercise) as several variables aren't known. Seems Disney is doing the same, just "plug in a few numbers here and there and presto! Profit!"
 

pheneix

Well-Known Member
Original Poster
One point I haven’t made yet is how 2024 is going to be the worst year in Disneys history. Absolutely in its modern history as far back as 2010. But really it’s probably be the worst ever, even when accounting for how different Disney is.

Movie studio? Cooked. Streaming? Loses money. TV networks? Messy. ESPN? Literally selling a stake of their own network because they can’t afford the rights NFL wants (no one can tbh). Theme parks? Well we’re seeing compelling evidence they are cooling off fast.

So much has hit the fan so fast. Hard to keep track of it all.
 

pheneix

Well-Known Member
Original Poster
Also, another random.

I don’t know how you expand magic kingdoms capacity. The difficulties they have managing this volume with their transit system don’t change. They get worse. MK just gets more overrun and more charm sucked out as they need more concrete just to move people.

They should have built a third Disneyland in the USA a long time ago. Best way to finally break the hold. Give the people another park to see. The destination they know they want to see.
 

Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.

Back
Top Bottom