In a way Disney is this currently:
en.wikipedia.org
Not that its going to suddenly explode but rather the underlying causes are all there for anyone who wants to look at it. Some simply don't.
The problems that brought down the Challenger were started from its earliest inception and flawed by many factors but a number of key assumptions. Assumptions that turned out to be catastrophic.
This is a case where wiki does a job highlighting the chain of events. But of particular not in the Rodgers commission that investigated the "accident" had a rogue agent, an agent provocateurs if you will in Richard Feynman. I wont go into all the details but he was particularly scathing of NASA and their "Go Fever" of getting up to 50 launches a year to their complete misunderstanding of what margin of safety actually means.
How this applies to Disney? A quote from Feynman himself:
"For a successful technology, reality must take precedence over public relations, for nature cannot be fooled."
Disney would be wise to heed that. The warning signs are all there, just a question of when.