Casper Gutman
Well-Known Member
Ah, so it’s the UNION preventing Disney from paying the wages the market demands. I hadn’t heard that take before. Are tram drivers in the same union as attraction attendants? My understanding is that they weren’t. Also, is their any actual reason to believe the union would block wage increases? Also also, we are more then a year into the staffing shortage - has Disney made any move at all to negotiate with the union? Also also also, even if the union did demand more widespread wage increases, isn’t that exactly how the market is supposed to work in a tight labor environment? Again, it’s endlessly amusing that the thought of a free market benefitting labor is simply inconceivable.Actually, they can't. Disney can't just unilaterally decide to raise salaries for new employees because they have a collective bargaining agreement that sets these things. Any change in the salary structure would have to result in a renegotiation of that bargaining agreement. Typically, in cases like these, let's say Disney wanted to raise the starting salary for these positions by $5 an hour. The union might only agree to this if they raised people with x number of years experience $10 an hour. But in any case it would be subject to agreement, requiring lawyers negotiation and fees along that line. The salary structure is a built-in construct of the agreement.
Universal is not subject to this issue because their employees are not unionized. They can set salaries at will. They also Did not lose tens of thousands of people because of travel bans and the termination of a college program.
Well yes, but that's a whole different ball game. Construction workers are not subject to the above collective bargaining agreements, are not dependent on the cultural representation program, etc. Disney hires firms to do the construction. They hire individuals to manage parking trams and to maintain those vehicles.
PS: that pesky college program - is that something WDW does out of pure altruism, or is it largely another way to save on labor costs? And if the latter, why is it’s continued absence any kind of rebuttal to the idea that Disney doesn’t want to pay workers what the market demands and is charging guests full price for an under-staffed experience?
Last edited: