And how about this.....
>>In other states, when a public official asks for a big check from an individual or business that would have good reason to be afraid to say no, it’s called extortion. In California, it’s called a “behested payment.”
A public official can ask for any amount of money. Unlike campaign contributions, there are no limits on behested payments. The money may be “behested” for a “charitable” purpose, which can include donations to non-profit organizations closely tied to the official or to a family member. Payments may also be sought for some government-related purpose, a category that has included lavish inaugural gala events and new office furniture.
It’s all legal. As long as the public official files a form to report “behested payments” of $5,000 or more within 30 days of the date they are made, activity that would flirt with a criminal investigation in other states is just one more fund-raising skill in California.
Nonetheless, it probably isn’t smart to overdo it. Asking too many companies for too much money is bound to attract attention.
That’s what has just happened to Gov. Gavin Newsom, who “behested” a mind-boggling $226,118,304 in donations in 2020.
Reason magazine reports that the haul of cash engineered by Newsom in 2020 is nearly $100 million more than all previously reported behested payments combined.
For example, the governor asked Blue Shield and Kaiser Permanente to donate a combined $45 million to support Project Homekey, Newsom’s effort to buy hotels and motels and turn them into permanent supportive housing for individuals experiencing homelessness. These state-regulated businesses may not have felt they could say no to the governor.
Then in January, Newsom selected Blue Shield for a $15 million contract to manage vaccine distribution in California, with assistance from Kaiser Permanente. CapRadio obtained a letter of intent confirming that there was no bidding process.
This is more than a problem of appearances. This is an abuse of emergency powers over an extended period of time. The governor is exercising absolute power, not only over lucrative contract awards, but over the ability of businesses to operate at all. Under these circumstances, a call from the governor asking for a payment is coercive, no matter how “voluntary” the donation may appear to be.
Behested payments can dwarf the amounts that companies donate in legally limited campaign contributions. Blue Shield gave $42,000 and $31,000 to Newsom’s campaign committee in 2018 and 2019, plus $69,000 and $200,000 to his ballot-measure committee in 2019 and 2020. These are significant donations, but they are dwarfed by the $20 million check Blue Shield wrote when the governor asked the company to support Project Homekey. That “ask” was considerably greater than the $100,000 payment Newsom “behested” from Blue Shield in 2019 for his “inaugural fund,” or the $300,000 he “behested” from the Blue Shield of California Foundation in 2020 to support the work of the “Commission on the Future of Work.”
Other companies that could potentially be hurt or helped by government actions also gave generously when the governor asked. Media companies donated millions of dollars worth of airtime and billboards. Facebook donated $25 million to pay for gift cards for the governor to give to nursing home workers.
Generosity is a wonderful thing, but coercion from a powerful public official is not. The practice of “behested payments” should be ended.<<
Generosity is a wonderful thing, but coercion from a powerful public official is not. The practice of “behested payments” should be ended.
www.ocregister.com