Well, Iger did claim that all he needed to do with GE was "tweet that it was open".oh yes - the newly common "you should spend lots of money to build rides and NOT market them" argument. Another marketing major here.

Well, Iger did claim that all he needed to do with GE was "tweet that it was open".oh yes - the newly common "you should spend lots of money to build rides and NOT market them" argument. Another marketing major here.
Quite a stretch you are making, and then saying it's "according to me".There is a rule of thumb that a movie’s marketing budget is about half of its production budget. According to you, every movie should be advertised as though it is Avengers: Endgame.
You’re the one rejecting the idea that different projects of different scopes should have a marketing push relevant to that scope. Disney’s problem is they spend too much so they have to have outsized marketing to get an acceptable return.Quite a stretch you are making, and then saying it's "according to me".
Not rejecting that at all. I'm questioning the thought process that Disney "over hypes" new rides or additions. Not even saying they don't, I'm saying I haven't seen it. The one example given was a promo where they said - new land is open - wow!You’re the one rejecting the idea that different projects of different scopes should have a marketing push relevant to that scope. Disney’s problem is they spend too much so they have to have outsized marketing to get an acceptable return.
Where are the walk around rat characters to meet and greet the guests?Glad ot see Rat get a standby. This is the way the attraction should operate. It ins't an E-Ticket, and it should just be a case of hitting the queue and riding whenever.
In costuming unfortunatelyWhere are the walk around rat characters to meet and greet the guests?
Where are the walk around rat characters to meet and greet the guests?
Not rejecting that at all. I'm questioning the thought process that Disney "over hypes" new rides or additions. Not even saying they don't, I'm saying I haven't seen it. The one example given was a promo where they said - new land is open - wow!
I mean, MGM opened with only two rides in the whole park....FLE: "Largest expansion in Magic Kingdom history!" That was plastered everywhere for months prior to opening. And it opened with Mermaid only, 7DMT didn't open with the land.
GE: Opened with MF only, Rise was still months away, and there was a large marketing push for that (despite Iger's unbridled hubris around it). The land is solid visually, but is woefully inadequate in other areas.
Anyway, back to the original topic - Rat never truly needed VQs. Having ridden both now (Epcot version in November), my opinion hasn't changed - It's a solid D-ticket.
I mean, MGM opened with only two rides in the whole park....
MGM was never about rides, it was about experiences. You had the behind the movies walking tour. IIRC, it took four hours to complete if you did it all. There were movie characters and cars in the entrance area. Of course, the GMR welcomed guests into the movie experience too. You could watch actual animators at work in the Animation Courtyard (IIRC, they were drawing BatB at the time). Theater of the Stars had a show going too. It was my favorite park and my family's second-favorite only behind MK.I mean, MGM opened with only two rides in the whole park....
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.