News Remy's Ratatouille Adventure coming to Epcot

Animewarsdude

New Member
It's not really splitting hairs, it's a good point. Fitzgerald said at D23, "The land's that inspire them". It's a very loose tie to World showcase, but I'd rather have things be directly tied to real lands and real cultures as opposed to implied lands and implied cultures. The problem is, with most of World Showcase being European Epcot is turning into Fantasyland and Tomorrowland and has lost it's own identity.
I really wish if they were putting in rides in world showcase, if it had to be IP based, that it would be IPs from those countries so at the very least they are putting forward something from that country and its media. Still, Rat is far better than FEA in terms of making sense to be there, as would Coco if they were to replace the Donald Duck ride featuring Mexico.
Ratatouille is actually the highest capacity attraction they are currently building. By a significant margin (although I'm not sure what MMRR will end up being). It will definitely have lines of course, but the extra 750-1000 guests over Tron, the Star Wars attractions and Guardians will make this attraction a non-issue.

I agree that the attraction is pretty 'meh'. But it certainly doesn't offend me as a good option for world showcase.
Yea, I don't even want to imagine the Millenium Falcon ride with its 7 ride vehicles and 6 seats, you might be able to ride it after 2 days using a fastpass.
 

BrianLo

Well-Known Member
Yea, I don't even want to imagine the Millenium Falcon ride with its 7 ride vehicles and 6 seats, you might be able to ride it after 2 days using a fastpass.

28 ride vehicles. But point still stands.

This is going to be fascinating. We really don't have any recent examples of two attractions with similar capacity and similar popularity expectations simultaneously opening. Apart from a new park opening I guess.

My expectation is that both function akin to FoP, which may lessen the overall burden if there was just one of them.
 

Animewarsdude

New Member
28 ride vehicles. But point still stands.

This is going to be fascinating. We really don't have any recent examples of two attractions with similar capacity and similar popularity expectations simultaneously opening. Apart from a new park opening I guess.

My expectation is that both function akin to FoP, which may lessen the overall burden if there was just one of them.
Oh that is slightly more reassuring, guess I just read a bad article making that claim. Still, the park won't have any real people chewers so wait times will likely be a 'bit' long. Really wish Disney would implement some more longer omnimover riders.
 

BrianLo

Well-Known Member
Oh that is slightly more reassuring, guess I just read a bad article making that claim. Still, the park won't have any real people chewers so wait times will likely be a 'bit' long. Really wish Disney would implement some more longer omnimover riders.

It wasn't incorrect, each carousel has 7 ride vehicles. But there are four of them, and four identical Millennium Falcon interiors (so hence the 28 total).
 

MotherOfBirds

Well-Known Member
None. Aside from what facades are left.

I'd like to dispute that just a bit. It's essentially just a retheming of Disaster, except not instead of real sets and interesting effects, they put you in a screen tunnel and shake you. The original sets could still be under there for all I know and the vehicles only look different.

Then again, I tend to get Vin Diesel and The Rock mixed up, so what do I know.
 

marni1971

Park History nut
Premium Member
I'd like to dispute that just a bit. It's essentially just a retheming of Disaster, except not instead of real sets and interesting effects, they put you in a screen tunnel and shake you. The original sets could still be under there for all I know and the vehicles only look different.

Then again, I tend to get Vin Diesel and The Rock mixed up, so what do I know.
Not that much when it comes to this I’m afraid. Disaster was razed aside from the facades facing the lagoon.
 

Stripes

Premium Member
You might say it feels like the best they could do given the space and ride system constraints?
You could say the same about Unis F&F ride. Neither of them should have been developed like they were.
No. F&F had a ride system and building size stipulation. And it shows sadly.
How much of Disaster did Fast and Furious use?
None. Aside from what facades are left.
Didn't you just indicate there was a retrofit here? Or were you referring to Hollywood?
I don’t believe so. Applied constraints were from above.
Sorry for all the quotes, but there's a misunderstanding here that I wanted to clear up. Martin was just saying that F&F had size and ride system constraints placed by management, and that negatively affected F&F. @RSoxNo1 Is coming from the point of view that WDI did the best they could with an existing space and what they had to work with.

Like @RSoxNo1, I personally see the two differently, but I can certainly see how @marni1971 views them as boiling down to the same problem. After all, in the end it all comes down to money.

Sorry again, but it seemed like there was too much confusion in this conversation.
 

GlacierGlacier

Well-Known Member
Interesting note - F&F and Kong have slightly different ride systems. One uses mechanical actuators to convey motion and the other uses air bags. I can't remember which is which, though.
 

MonkeyHead

Well-Known Member
Not that much when it comes to this I’m afraid. Disaster was razed aside from the facades facing the lagoon.

Not quite true. Some of the section of the building facing Diagon Alley, is part of the original structure (it’s the part of the loading platform section and part of pre-show scenes 1, and 2) just completely gutted and then they built the rest of the new show building onto that. I’m assuming for tax and filing fee purposes. IE: Renovation as opposed to complete new build.

But yes, a majority of the structure is brand new.
 

Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.

Back
Top Bottom