deeevo
Well-Known Member
A golf cart ride away.How far away are the new DVC cabins and the reflections site? I wonder if they will add amenities then to drum up some sales for the Cabins as these are failing bad
A golf cart ride away.How far away are the new DVC cabins and the reflections site? I wonder if they will add amenities then to drum up some sales for the Cabins as these are failing bad
I agree to some of this. In my opinion the whole purpose of the Cabins was to attract pet owners to buy in. We will see but right now it appears they over estimated the draw for a pet friendly DVC.The Cabins debacle (and by extension the "Reflectionization" of the campground) shows how tone deaf current WDW management is and underscores the complete lack of understanding they have in their own products and customer base.
If sales are indeed poor, a sizable portion of your traditional DVC customers, who prefer amenities and convenience, aren't buying in because of the perceived lack of amenities and convenience.
And a large portion of Ft. Wilderness "cabin" fans (like our family who loved the property and made multiple week-long visits each year for more than a decade), are completely turned off because the entire theme and much of what we loved about the place has been stripped away.
I'm not sure the first subset of guests could be won over by this project no matter what direction it took.
But WDW had a golden opportunity to convert a ton of cabin fans to happy DVC customers if they had just kept the theme of the cabins and campground intact.
Heck, I've always been super wary of DVC but would have signed up in a heartbeat if they'd just updated the existing cabins (or replaced them with newer versions of the same).
Ft. Wilderness isn't for everyone, but those who do like it are pretty passionate about it.
Maybe Disney has data to back up its decision, but building something that manages to alienate both sets of potential customers is certainly a head-scratcher.
That’s exactly what happened. The high m/fs are to pay for the replacement in 25 years or so. But if no one buys then that plan goes out the window.I have no idea how TWDC moves around/crunches it financials, but the original “cabins” manufactured homes very will themed to look like cabins I presume needed to be refurbished based on some Disney calculations.
Maybe the accountants said, “Since we need to refurbish these anyway, let’s replace them with DVCs the money spent is against Disney’s DCV company which makes truckloads of money and could possibly bring down that income for tax purposes, and these are now DVCs which Disney loves; huge buy in, and maintenance fees for 50 years or so, and if a non DVCer wants to stay there, the nightly rates are huge, Disney wins again.
They always want to have a resort in active sales. The Poly is likely to sell out much quicker than Riviera, since it’s adding the larger villas to the existing association. If sales are stagnating at Riviera and the Cabins, they’ll want something else to be selling. That’s how they think.
They may have gone too far with this one…That’s exactly what happened. The high m/fs are to pay for the replacement in 25 years or so. But if no one buys then that plan goes out the window.
Poly will sell way faster than rivieraRIV should definitely sell out first unless some weird shenanigans go down. There’s only about 2.2 million points left as of this time, with Poly generally expected to have 4+ million. RIV might even sell out by 2026.
Poly has to compete against its own resale after the initial opening sales rush. Plus I feels like there is always some disappointing shoe that drops that we cannot foresee yet.
All of which is to say I agree - their eye is going to be on what’s next in a couple years.
Poly will sell way faster than riviera
Which is why you don’t build ontop of caribbean, charge too much, and put stupid sales limitations on the contract
What happens when they open a desired location over a bad (debatable) one is that the sales flatline for the latter.Sell faster, or sell out faster?
In order to do the latter it would have to become the best selling DVC resort ever. Or for RIV to grind to a sudden halt. More so than it did with VGF.
The cost is minimal…which is the point and why they never should have tried it.It almost seems like the FW DVC is offered as sacrifice to sell all the points at the new Polynesian building quickly. Because if they never sell these, they can still be offered each night for cash and make money anyway. The DVC cost/benefit ratio seems rather ugly for these cabins. I'll gladly stay there on my own points, but no way I'm going to lock myself into a long term contract on a property that doesn't have it's own quick service, swimming pool, or bus stop.
What happens when they open a desired location over a bad (debatable) one is that the sales flatline for the latter.
Saratoga sales ground to halt when bay lake and DAKL went up…which is why I bought too early
They’re already discounting and price haggling now - quietly - they’re gonna have to kick it into high gear for riviera and the cabins
Currently the trailers…riviera…Disneyland Hotel…Aulani and Grand Floridian conversionI do not know about this stuff. RESALES ASIDE. Are there any DVC locations that are still not sold out, meaning there are still units that Disney has not been sold initially?
We’ve already been through this. VGF was outsold by RIV when price was not a factor. Poly would need to sustain 2-1 sales for years. It’s not happening.
RIV isn’t generally considered to have a bad location. It’s not prime, but the sky liner makes it on the second tier.
Next conspiracy?
I don’t follow much…
The trailers, Disneyland Hotel and GF conversion are relatively new.Currently the trailers…riviera…Disneyland Hotel…Aulani and Grand Floridian conversion
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.