lentesta
Premium Member
This is the funniest thing I've read so far today.
-
Welcome to the WDWMAGIC.COM Forums!
Please take a look around, and feel free to sign up and join the community.
News Reedy Creek Improvement District and the Central Florida Tourism Oversight District
- Thread starter castlecake2.0
- Start date
This is the funniest thing I've read so far today.
JAB
Well-Known Member
Maybe it means the legislature should "rescue" the district by having the "courage" to do the "honor"able thing and "fire" the CFTOD board.
lazyboy97o
Well-Known Member
From the Disney’s Animal Kingdom thread about Dinoland.
This is something to watch going forward. Reedy Creek Improvement District predates the municipalities because it started as the Reedy Creek Drainage District. Water management is something the District took very seriously and was one of those areas where they were quite demanding.
After months of back and forth to get deposition dates for the Board members, they were finally scheduled for late March and early April, starting with Garcia on March 22. Disney filed notice of the dates on March 1.
Yesterday, March 19, after 5 pm, CFTOD filed motions seeking protective orders to prevent Disney from deposing them. (There are 2 motions: 1 in the lawsuit filed by CFTOD and 1 in the Public Records case filed by Disney.)
Yesterday, March 19, after 5 pm, CFTOD filed motions seeking protective orders to prevent Disney from deposing them. (There are 2 motions: 1 in the lawsuit filed by CFTOD and 1 in the Public Records case filed by Disney.)
Stripes
Premium Member
Garcia was scheduled to be deposed in two days.
Yep.
lazyboy97o
Well-Known Member
I believe the technical term for sworn statements not being in agreement is “not good”.
I really liked how the affidavits say they have no unique and personal knowledge about the district’s responses to public records requests because (they essentially assert) they each did their best to personally identify and disclose the records from their personal devices.
Here is the BOS agenda for the March 27 meeting
But then there's this one from the link on the separate Meeting Page:
which includes this:
8. NEW BUSINESS
8.1 Consideration of Employment Agreement with Stephanie Kopelousos for District Administrator
Gilzean has officially resigned?
JoeCamel
Well-Known Member
Had to google but I see she is one of the panhandle good old boys. Pwerfect choice for central Florida
JoeCamel
Well-Known Member
Thought the affidavit said Mar 6
JAB
Well-Known Member
Can someone with more legal expertise please explain how they have any legal grounds to refuse a deposition? Seems to this layperson like they're just trying the "nuh uh" tactic with no legitimate basis simply because if they had to answer questions under oath, it would be not so great for them. Reminds me a bit of "Liar Liar" - "I object!"; "Why's that?"; "Because it's devastating to my case."
One can attempt to quash a deposition IF the reasons for said motion meet law. You just can't say no...a motion has to be filed and a hearing set on that motion. Until that happens, most depositions will be stayed.
Rule 1.410 - SUBPOENA, Fla. R. Civ. P. 1.410 | Casetext Search + Citator
Read Rule 1.410 - SUBPOENA, Fla. R. Civ. P. 1.410, see flags on bad law, and search Casetext’s comprehensive legal database
casetext.com
What, the out of state lawyer hired to represent the district? There wasn't a single lawyer in the State of Florida unable to provide legal services to the District in this matter? No retired judges, law professors, etc? What's John Morgan or Dan Newlin doing?