HiGhLy UNUZhOOaL FiRe DePartMenT
What is this almost you speak of?It's almost as if they're not qualified to hold their positions on the Board.
It's almost as if they're not qualified to hold their positions on the Board.
Which will have this emblem....like all the other thousands of fire departments in the US
Another waste of RCID taxpayer $$$...
View attachment 773346
View attachment 773398
Courage! Fire! Honor!
That's what those who rescue bring to the table!
Perhaps the FIRE and RESCUE could have been red lettering on gold background to cue one that they should be read together.
Maybe it means the legislature should "rescue" the district by having the "courage" to do the "honor"able thing and "fire" the CFTOD board.View attachment 773398
Courage! Fire! Honor!
That's what those who rescue bring to the table!
Perhaps the FIRE and RESCUE could have been red lettering on gold background to cue one that they should be read together.
ding ding ding indeedMaybe it means the legislature should "rescue" the district by having the "courage" to do the "honor"able thing and "fire" the CFTOD board.
From the Disney’s Animal Kingdom thread about Dinoland.Totally missed this one. Up until recently SFWMD permits were filed by RCID. I assumed they would switch to CFTOD so I have also been searching that. This permit was filed directly by Disney so I didn't find it in my searches.
Garcia was scheduled to be deposed in two days.After months of back and forth to get deposition dates for the Board members, they were finally scheduled for late March and early April, starting with Garcia on March 22. Disney filed notice of the dates on March 1.
Yesterday, March 19, after 5 pm, CFTOD filed motions seeking protective orders to prevent Disney from deposing them. (There are 2 motions: 1 in the lawsuit filed by CFTOD and 1 in the Public Records case filed by Disney.)
Garcia was scheduled to be deposed in two days.
I believe the technical term for sworn statements not being in agreement is “not good”.BTW, Garcia’s Affidavits in support of the Motions confirms that his tenure ended earlier this month (on March 6 or March 8, depending on which of his Affidavits you’re reading).
The logic here is mangled and pathetic. (From the affidavits in order to support their motion rooted in the apex doctrine.)
View attachment 773966
Here is the BOS agenda for the March 27 meeting
But then there's this one from the link on the separate Meeting Page:
which includes this:
8. NEW BUSINESS
8.1 Consideration of Employment Agreement with Stephanie Kopelousos for District Administrator
Had to google but I see she is one of the panhandle good old boys. Pwerfect choice for central FloridaBut then there's this one from the link on the separate Meeting Page:
which includes this:
8. NEW BUSINESS
8.1 Consideration of Employment Agreement with Stephanie Kopelousos for District Administrator
Thought the affidavit said Mar 6Gilzean has officially resigned?
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.