News Reedy Creek Improvement District and the Central Florida Tourism Oversight District

Surferboy567

Well-Known Member
Wait? How did this happen, this seems pretty cut and dry and they didn’t even allow it to have a trial?

All this waiting for nothing? Corruption? I can’t tell.

Does this also mean the board’s lawsuit is also gone?
 

ZachPL

Well-Known Member
Highly unlikely to succeed though, this was dismissed prior to trial.
It get's appealed to the 11th circuit, being dismissed prior to trial is an even higher bar that has to be reached by the judge. So I wouldn't say it's Highly unlikely to succeed. At least at this point.

Is anyone really surprised by this though? As soon as the first judge bowed out and Winsor was selected this was pretty much a foregone conclusion in my mind.
A federalist society member whos views directly align with trump and desantis. Frankly it was expected.
 

mikejs78

Premium Member
Highly unlikely to succeed though, this was dismissed prior to trial.

Not sure why you say it's unlikely to succeed. Motions to dismiss are overruled on appeal all the time. If the appeals court feels Disney does have standing to sue, they remand back to the judge.

Here's what everyone needs to know.

"Disney has alleged enough to show standing to sue the CFTOD Defendants. Disney has not, though, shown standing to sue the Governor or the Secretary." (p. 5 of https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.flnd.463456/gov.uscourts.flnd.463456.114.0.pdf)

In other words, this suit is dismissed. Go back to the drawing board and re-work your suit against CFTOD only.

That's true, but there is still the appeal. The appeals court seems to be a bit less friendly to DeSantis than some of the district courts are.
 

flynnibus

Premium Member
Here's what everyone needs to know.

"Disney has alleged enough to show standing to sue the CFTOD Defendants. Disney has not, though, shown standing to sue the Governor or the Secretary." (p. 5 of https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.flnd.463456/gov.uscourts.flnd.463456.114.0.pdf)

In other words, this suit is dismissed. Go back to the drawing board and re-work your suit against CFTOD only.
I think you missed where he said

" and its claims against the CFTOD Defendants fail on the merits because “when a statute is facially constitutional, a plaintiff cannot bring a free-speech challenge by claiming that the lawmakers who passed it acted with a constitutionally impermissible purpose.” In re Hubbard, 803 F.3d 1298, 1312 (11th Cir. 2015). "

He basically shutdown Disney's claims of retaliation purely on the Hubbard case.
 

Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.

Back
Top Bottom