Nope.
It’s angry boomers seeing the end and desperate poor people who feel left behind…
I think it’s both
I think they are in the business of putting on a show so every two years they hold a money generating event for their fans and want them to leave happy so they tell them happy things. If you ever thought the D23 was an earnings call with all the guardrails they have then you probably believe wrestling is a real competition.
Well…you got that one figured out
And with the followers lining up to drink the Kool Aid to believe the lies as truth.
Or a married guy…lol
Don’t ever say wrestling was fake directly TO a professional wrestler. You’ll get you @$$ kicked.
This sounds like Disney should "kiss the pinky ring" and shut up. Which makes sense if one believes that supreme authority and giver of rights lies with an entity or state. Certainly around the world, those places where it works that way exist, but in this country, we decided supreme authority lies with the people whose rights exist, naturally, by the Creator. Our government exists to make sure those Natural Rights are acknowledged and protected from abuses by others who wish to deny them. We periodically select people to be the enforcers of these rights, and over the course of our history some of those people have been better at it than others. RCID was created because of the need to balance the rights of the property owner of these land parcels with the rights of the people of FL, and to do it effectively and efficiently. And as has been pointed out in the previous posts, there were many benefits to the people of FL. However, "created" is sort of the wrong word to use for what the state did, as it implies that something didn't exist before. Land use, taxation and the disagreements surrounding those has existed forever. This was a novel way to *address* these timeless issues. Out of necessity, given the scope of the project and the ability of state & local entities to fulfill their responsibilities. Also previously mentioned, heralded and adopted elsewhere because of how successful a framework it turned out to be. The state of FL continues to have the same type of responsibilities. No entity should be expected to give the state leeway in 2023 when they disregard their responsibilities, because of actions taken in 1967 to face and deal with them.Okay. One last time. That is more than disagreeing but promising to actively use your resources to oppose the State of Florida - the very state that created the RCID legislation to begin with. Legislators were like, "WTH?" Anyway, this is where we are now.
Why would I say it is fake? Maybe the problem is you don't see nuance and that is why you argue I never did say it was fake.
A few things could be on the table including items not listed:
Wait, you disagree that it's legal to disagree with a law and try to fight it either through lobbying or legal challenges? What specifically is illegal about it?We'll have to agree to disagree.
What an…interesting…way of putting it.
No, the difference is the new board is appointed by the governor where it is expected that a governor will have significant influence on the people they appoint to various roles. Reedy Creek pre-Desantis was technically an independent board that was not supposed to be run by Disney though everyone from the beginning knew that it was. The fact that the state ignored what should have been smacked down doesn't really matter, just like the federal government has been ignoring pot usage for years... until the DEA decided that they wanted some easy money and went in cahoots with a state to use civil asset forfeiture on an armored car. You can't ignore laws simply because they aren't being enforced because you always run the risk of someone deciding to enforce them.
Doesn’t look like it turned out to be too much of a risk. If the goal was to fix something that was wrong, it may not have been done so incompetently. This is what happens when a politician recklessly tries to misuse political power.
How is this true? RCID board was designed to be held by landowners, at the time of it's creation the only landowners were Disney. Disney was still really the only landowner, they just sold/gave those small plots of land to people they chose to serve on the board.
The fact is that the state couldn't have cared less about a mutually beneficial agreement. The current Dictator of Florida is using this as a political agenda.
There’s so much legally, historically, and factually wrong with this post I don’t even know where to begin.
