News Reedy Creek Improvement District and the Central Florida Tourism Oversight District

Sirwalterraleigh

Sirwalterraleigh

Premium Member
peter11435 said:
Unions certainly had involvement in pushing Disney to act on the parental rights bill. And unions are given notice of actions that will impact their members. Unions are not given insight into pending legal actions.
Click to expand...
Is that what the mid levels in LBV are saying as they try to dig out on the ground?

Because you know the unions have almost zero practical say there.

They were never not going to not say something with this. It just lined up to put them in the crosshairs…from the idea it started in someone’s rear

I screamed for years that chapek was wrong to even be there and they needed to “streamline” him the hell outta there…before he was the staggs replacement…

But I can’t scream at him about this. This reality is the fault/Natural extension of societal stupidity that is a major deal…nothing to do with Disney really.

They do make themselves a ripe target - granted - but their business decisions really aren’t the concern of Tallahassee
 
Last edited:
peter11435

peter11435

Well-Known Member
Sirwalterraleigh said:
They were never not going so say something with this. It just lined up to put them in the crosshairs…from the idea it started in someone’s rear
Click to expand...
That’s really not true. Had there not been an outcry from cast, unions, and some guests, the company was prepared to not make a public statement regarding the parental rights bill. Instead choosing to stay publicly silent while working solely behind the scenes.
 
Sirwalterraleigh

Sirwalterraleigh

Premium Member
peter11435 said:
That’s really not true. Had there not been an outcry from cast, unions, and some guests, the company was prepared to not make a public statement regarding the parental rights bill. Instead choosing to stay publicly silent while working solely behind the scenes.
Click to expand...
I’m sure there is widespread remorse/regret in “the company” for the statement…

…but there is little legitimate conceivable way they weren’t gonna say something based on their workforce.
It just doesn’t scan.
 
peter11435

peter11435

Well-Known Member
castlecake2.0 said:
It’s also just a waste of money to have to rebrand everything that’s basically doing the same job
Click to expand...
Yep. The name change is just more proof that it’s less about oversight and constitutionality and more about blatant power grabs, silencing, and making an example of Disney.

The District should sue the state to cover the cost of all signage replacements
 
M

mmascari

Well-Known Member
A few things come to mind reading the last few pages.

1: A few posters, and most news stories are still stuck on the district dissolving and not the new law that redefines and takes control of the existing district. Bonus news stories that still do not understand how the district works.

2: Lots of posts about how the change will impact park project content. That misses the point, it’s how park projects will be impacted because of any Disney content, they don't need to be related. I suppose that Disney reducing the amount of park projects reduces the impact surface. There’s still basic operations impacts possible.

3: It was not long ago that Disney extended Bob C's contract and he was here for the long run then. Then, that completely changed. I’m not saying Disney is going to change and fight this vs being done, just that things change and we’re not going to know until we know.
 

Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.

Back
Top Bottom