Married5Times
Well-Known Member
Pack the castle up.. move it somewhere
you're talking about $100 billion + move to do a watered-down version of the existing WDW
Pack the castle up.. move it somewhere
‘Retaliation’ dude. The 1A is not just about PREVENTING speech.In no way is Florida legislators denying Disney their first amendment right, in no way is the Florida legislature impeding their ability to do business. Tell me how Disney's free speech is being stifled
I thought everyone would know thst was a joke. Sorry.you're talking about $100 billion + move to do a watered-down version of the existing WDW
This very scenario was brought up before… lookup when guliani tried to defund the art museum over it’s content. Spoiler - he lostSo you believe NJ must subsidize the monthly Klan editorials in perpetuity? Sparkle (the now anti-LGBTQ publication) is entitled to NJ state benefits forever?
thought everyone would know thst was a joke. Sorry.
Which is exactly why Disney’s benefits have to be so completely misrepresented. A lot of people are not going to be angry over the idea that Disney pays their taxes and pays extra to cover the costs of the infrastructure the county would otherwise have to cover.Voters taxes shooting up is what gets their attention. Unfortunately that right now is in the background of reporting. Wait until they are hit with it.
That's what some have been trying (very hard) to convince us of for a 100 pages or so now.So your position is that RCID is not a benefit provided to Disney by the Florida state government?
I will introduce you to the word ‘injunction’While I do see the various legal processes eventually carry this issue to the High Court time lapse wise RCID would have ceased to exist by then. The landscape will look completely different.
Because they’re completely separate taxes levied by a different body. Money isn’t diverted from Orange County to the District.I’m an Orange County resident and I’m upset by this. I hope those numbers aren’t accurate tho. I’m so confused, because why wouldn’t Orange County just not take the tax money that was being paid to reedy creek?
Then give specifics. Show us examples of misinformation. Show how people previously opposed the District now support it.That's what some have been trying (very hard) to convince us of for a 100 pages or so now.
This thread is so full of misinformation and people with clear agendas it's mind boggling and pretty useless from an informational standpoint.
Because they were not orange county taxes. They don’t just roll over because the very definition of them goes awayI’m an Orange County resident and I’m upset by this. I hope those numbers aren’t accurate tho. I’m so confused, because why wouldn’t Orange County just not take the tax money that was being paid to reedy creek?
He certainly has the background and position to put out correct information on the topic, but it also wouldn't be out of the question to lie about it considering he is an elected Democrat, and it would stand to reason that he has an interest in taking DeSantis and the GOP-majority in the legislature down.What does the Orange County Tax Collector gain from lying about Disney’s taxes? Would he not be the person most familiar with any taxes Disney is not paying to Orange County? Isn’t he going to face voter anger over increased taxes?
And that line of thinking just exposes more illegal activity. Stop giving donations and we’ll target you with punitive action??
Re read what you are saying dude. This is not how elected government is supposed to act.
Then why didn’t the state just sue the District to have it declared unconstitutional?Disney will loose in court on this one because the Reedy Creek Act was granted before the state constitution was established. As a Disney shareholder I am furious that they waded into this whole mess.
So then your point that RCID is not a tax break is irrelevant. Either it is a benefit or it is not. If it is not a benefit, then it's not "punishment" to take it away (and therefore not possibly a violation of free speech). If it is a benefit, then the question is whether or not the state's action is an infringement on the 1st Amendment.I have specifically noted the benefits. They are not what you and many others just assume.
It won't ... and it won't.Local reporting suggests this will drive up property taxes by 20-25%. This will create a crisis both for the local governments and for property owners: https://www.wftv.com/news/local/end...re-taxes-you-will/3TK6ASNJT5EXHICW3DQ3ZHEZYA/
Of course it is a benefit. It just isn't the kind that many people are trying to make it out to be. Bottom line, it HAD to be put into place because the State of Florida did not have the resources to build out the needed infrastructure to support the project. It is also beneficial to both Disney and the counties. They don't have to spend time and money working on Disney property and Disney gets self control over how quickly and in what way those projects take place.That's what some have been trying (very hard) to convince us of for a 100 pages or so now.
This thread is so full of misinformation and people with clear agendas it's mind boggling and pretty useless from an informational standpoint.
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.