Surferboy567
Well-Known Member
Correct, I doubt that’s the case though.If Disney wiggles its way back in to have control of their business, I guess that would be a win and back to their old situation, which worked fine for 50 years.
I hope so, it just seems so weird they would be willing to play ball with them all of a sudden?I have a feeling they had input in the new chain and administrator. Felt they were people they could work with. I could obviously be wrong.
I have to agree with this.There is almost zero concessions to Disney here… this looks like Disney just laying down its sword and taking the knee.
I hope so, but that’s up to the districtChange in leadership in the District amidst all of this being announced? Sounds like both parties are ready to move on and put the theatrics in the past. Back to business as usual.
I hope that’s the case, but again would the district be willing to play ball with Disney? After all they have done to undermine them?And Disney gets to move ahead with the MK, DHS, and AK work without artificial delays from the board.
CorrectExcept the board was prevented from accessing their most direct means of creating delays. Now they get to move forward with changing the comprehensive plan and development regulations, opening up that very ability to meddle.
CorrectThe development regulations can now be modified to require more approvals. This was the mechanism by which such censorship would have been pushed and is now available.
Definitely possibleThe timing of Gilzean and Garcia leaving just before everything changes can't be ignored. I would assume that is part of a backroom handshake agreement and not the official changes enacted now with the new members.
Thought I’d just stick all the responses in one big post, to keep things neat.
Side Note: This also can set a really bad precedent.