News Reedy Creek Improvement District and the Central Florida Tourism Oversight District

Drdcm

Well-Known Member
Those detested lawyers will ensure that the parties "make up" in a way that precludes unfair interference by the board. That's just what those hated, money-grubbing folks do.
Those darn lawyers… doing the job they were hired to do. I hate them too 😉

If only public opinion could replace the law right? I mean we wouldn’t have to deal with those darn lawyers and all those pesky rules.

FWIW… I generally stop engaging when people think they know how to do my profession better than me. Assuming you are in fact a lawyer
 

WoundedDreamer

Well-Known Member
I wouldnt call it that..... We don't know the full scope of what was promised.
While Disney gets something in this agreement, the decision to vacate the contract is pretty overwhelming. Disney's best piece of leverage against Florida, the contract, is no more. That was the thing their case rested upon. It's over and done. Giving that up willingly is a tactical retreat. That's not to say Disney lost the "war." I don't see any winners or losers here, because this is best for both the state and Disney. But that is a concession on their part. But they're doing this on their own terms in an orderly way. And that's smart.
 

Surferboy567

Well-Known Member
FWIW… I generally stop engaging when people think they know how to do my profession better than me. Assuming you are in fact a lawyer
By the way, and this isn’t directed at anybody in particular this comment reminded me though. I don’t want to come off as I know anything about law, districts and such. I’m looking at this from a high point of view and only giving opinions. I’m not versed in law, or public districts.

EDIT: If I ever came off like that I apologize.
 
It was political from the get go in perhaps the most regressive/toxic political jurisdiction we have…

That will pass with time…I’d guess when X becomes the elders…just a hunch.
What????? The State of Florida and the elected representatives that run the state that I live in prevailed with regard to this matter. It is as simple as that.
 

WoundedDreamer

Well-Known Member
Stability looks good on the Street just before the shareholder meeting. This is surprising on it's face, but shouldn't be since they had filed an SEC notice last year that the Florida issues were impacting their business. Now... poof... kumbaya
This is exactly right. This was an unnecessary distraction for Iger. While I'm no Iger fan, I would have advised to get out of this case and focus on the bigger issues. That's the future of the company and his legacy.
 

flynnibus

Premium Member
It's a deal they can enforce. If the governor or the board violates the terms of the settlement, all bets are off.

No - the statement i repiked to was “I have a feeling they had input in the new chain and administrator. Felt they were people they could work with. I could obviously be wrong”

The settlement doesn’t chsnge the law that the gov and state have sole discretion on board members.

Just getting someone to say ‘we’ll be nice’ is not a contract and not something disney can throw out the deal on if they don’t like an appointment or decision.

At the end of the day, this gives Disney a shorter path to certainty in growing and managing their business - which, for them, may be a huge win given their expansion plans. Many of us may not like it, given the Injustice of what was done, but the reality is Disney has a business to run and they have to do what's best for their business. If an opportunity presented itself that gave Disney that certainty and the ability to deal with a less combative board, I could see why Disney would jump at the chance, as much as I wish they didn't.

I’m sure Chamerblin felt the same way…
 

ToTBellHop

Well-Known Member
This is exactly right. This was an unnecessary distraction for Iger. While I'm no Iger fan, I would have advised to get out of this case and focus on the bigger issues. That's the future of the company and his legacy.
This had become extremely toxic for the company so this is for the best. It does anger me that this is the result because I feel strongly that Disney was in-the-right, here, but...this is probably the best they can hope for in the State of Florida right now...
 

Drdcm

Well-Known Member
By the way, and this isn’t directed at anybody in particular this comment reminded me though. I don’t want to come off as I know anything about law, districts and such. I’m looking at this from a high point of view and only giving opinions. I’m not versed in law, or public districts.

EDIT: If I ever came off like that I apologize.
I wasn’t trying to call you out. I was just sort of commiserating about engaging in an online forum when you are an expert and are interacting with people who have strong opinions but aren’t.

For me it involves mental health stuff and hoo boy the stuff people say to me is absurd.
 

flynnibus

Premium Member
This had become extremely toxic for the company so this is for the best. It does anger me that this is the result because I feel strongly that Disney was in-the-right, here, but...this is probably the best they can hope for in the State of Florida right now...

Yup… it’s almost like fighting abusive government is hard and takes sacrifice. Better to just lie down and take the stick…
 

Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.

Back
Top Bottom