Chip Chipperson
Well-Known Member
Special Districts aren't municipalities and are establishedthe way they are for a reason. Lake Buena Vista and Bay Lake are and they operate under the "1 resident, 1 vote" rule that every other municipality does.In typical municipalities, that is irrelevant to the election and representation of the people. If I own an apartment complex with 1000 units, I get 0 votes, and each tenant of mine gets 1 vote, even if I'm paying 90% of the revenue in a town.
If Disney took one vote, and gave every tenant on Disney's property a vote, that would be more fair, but Disney has no interest in doing that.
You aren't leasing a hotel room, you're renting one and there's a big difference between that and a business with a lease in a commercial property.While Disney pays the taxes to the district, ya'll keep arguing that they aren't the only beneficiary because they lease land to other people. When I stay in a Disney hotel, I am one of those people, so by that argument, I am the taxpayer, along with all of the business owners leasing land from Disney.
Then you don’t want ANY special districts as they're established under FL law. So instead of attacking RCID and Disney, focus on the laws themselves. Singling out 1 Special District for change when it operated as it was allowed to and in the same manner as other special districts is what's not fair.Its just not in any way fair to Disney to get to make every decision for the district.
Florida's economy would have been helped more by the alternative, which would have been Disney built the same exact parking garages, paid sales tax and impact fees while building them, and then every year paid property taxes on them. That would have allowed all of the county's tax payers to benefit instead of just Disney.
No. Like flynnibus, you are assuming that Disney had 2 budgets - 1 for the current setup and 1 for the same setup but paying directly for the garages itself. That was never going to happen. Had the District said no to the garages, the plan would have been scaled back accordingly and the County would have lost out on the additional property tax assessments from the expanded and renovated Disney Springs since the scope of the project would have shrunk.
It's inconsequential for the County, not Disney's Disney Spring renovation budget. Also, this ignores the benefit to the other taxpayers in the District. As I said before, why are you outraged on the County's behalf when the Cou ty was happy with the project?If its so inconsequential, why is Disney going through all this to evade such a small amount of taxes? Also, the problem is the county DOES NOT get to collect additional property taxes for the improved parking facilities, that is something they specifically avoided.
Wrong again. The energy plant is a public utility and provides its services to all properties within the District. Shades of Green, Hilton, AMC, etc. aren't getting their utilities from some other source.The same story applies to ALL of the services RCID provided... the energy plants provide power only Disney, but evade taxes that anyone else doing the same would have to, etc...
What public roads or parking garages are taxed? None because government entities are exempt from taxes. That's why Disney pays taxes for its property but RCID doesn't. Same as Orlando, Miami, Tampa, etc.If you guys think parking lots, roads, and such should not be taxes, lets not tax it for ANYBODY in the state of Florida, but only exempting Disney is unfair.