2nd AMENDMENT TO THE WDW 5th GATE PROJECT
I wanted to add some more details for the contestants and any interested contestants regarding Park Feedback and Profits
PARK FEEDBACK
Each contestant will have a 10 Question Guest Survey. In fact it might be easier if everyone has this same survey, so everyone can get feedback in the same format. An example survey is shown below:
1) How would you rate the park? (Scale of 1-10)
2) How would you rate the restaurants? (Scale of 1-10)
3) What is the likelihood of you buying any souvenirs/gifts in the parks? (Scale of 1-10)
4) What were the top 5 attractions in the park?
5) What was the best land in the park?
6) How much do you want to visit this park? (Scale of 1-10)
7) Chances of you returning to the park again? (Scale of 1-10)
8) Is there anything about the park you didn't like?
9) Is there anything in the park you would add or expand upon?
10) Any other comments?
Each of you will fill out each other's survey. So, for example, if there are 10 contestants, you will fill out 9 Guest Surveys. It is essential that you get a lot of feedback because I will use this as a measure to determine Park Ratings and simultaneously, park profits.
PARK PROFITS
Since there is no real money on the forum, and I don't want to simply use my own speculation on how much each park. Therefore, I have devised a method to determine park "attendance numbers" and in-park merchandise revenue.
The highest rated Guest Survey responses to Questions 1,2,3,6,7 will receive the highest revenue. A sort of "mini-victory" in each phase. The rest of the questions are meant to help you find out what people liked and didn't like about your park, to guide your future expansions/updates. Maybe if everyone doesn't like your "Up" ride for example, then you'll "up"date it (pardon the pun
) in your next phase to something else.
I had mentioned that lower Guest Survey responses will also receive funds to expand and improve. This is true, however, as was done with DCA and DHS, reviews need to be consistently lower in order for a large expansion budget to be approved. Consequently, the lowest reviewed park will get some revenue, but it won't receive a big budget expansion project for at least 2 phases.
I'll clarify with an example:
Let's say there are 3 Parks in the competition: Park A, Park B, Park C
Park A gets an average score of 10/10 rating on Phase 1 reviews
Park B gets an average score of 7/10 rating on Phase 1 reviews
Park C gets an average score of 5/10 rating on Phase 1 reviews
A 10/10 rating = $1 Billion in revenue ----- so Park A is awarded $1 Billion based on reviews
A 7/10 rating = $700 Million in revenue --- so Park B is awarded $700 Million based on reviews
A 5/10 rating = $500 Million in revenue --- so Park C is awarded $500 Million based on reviews
When Phase 2 begins, each of the 3 Parks will receive their Phase 2 budget (which is constant among all teams) of $1 Billion.
This means that Park A will now have $2 Billion total to spend, Park B $1.7 Billion, Park C $1.5 Billion. Another point before I forget is that your profits can roll over into the next phase. For instance, if you have $300 Million left and think your park is good, save it for the next phase, that way you'll have more to work with on an expansion project.
Continuing with the above example, let's say Park C finishes Phase 2 with a 5/10 rating again. After 2 Phases, every project gets an "Expansion Budget" on top of their "Phase Budget" The lowest reviewed park at the end of Phase 2 will receive the largest expansion budget ($ amount TBD) and the highest reviewed park will receive the least expansion budget. That way, the highly reviewed parks still have enough profit to keep making great attractions, but the lower rating parks have an opportunity to redeem themselves with some added budget.
Hopefully this all makes sense, but again if you all have any comments or concerns please feel free to leave them here.